Skip to main content
Log in

Thomas Nagel: Mind and Cosmos. Why the Materialist, Neo-Darwinian Conception is Almost Certainly False

Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York 2012, 144 pp, $24.95, ISBN: 978-0199919758

  • Book review
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. To be sure analytical metaethics produced a broad spectrum of quite different subjectivits theories from Ayer’s and Stevenson’s emotivism to Hare’s prescriptivism.

  2. Scanlon, Nagel, Dworkin, Larmore and in Germany von Kutschera and myself are some of its representatives.

References

  • Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Rümelin, J. (2010). Reasons against naturalizing epistemic reasons. In A. Carsetti (Ed.), Causality, meaningful complexity and embodied cognition (pp. 203–210). Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Nida-Rümelin, M. (2006). Der Blick von innen. Zur transtemporalen Identität bewusstseinsfähiger Wesen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Nida-Rümelin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nida-Rümelin, J. Thomas Nagel: Mind and Cosmos. Why the Materialist, Neo-Darwinian Conception is Almost Certainly False. J Gen Philos Sci 45, 403–406 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-014-9262-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-014-9262-8

Navigation