Notes
To be sure analytical metaethics produced a broad spectrum of quite different subjectivits theories from Ayer’s and Stevenson’s emotivism to Hare’s prescriptivism.
Scanlon, Nagel, Dworkin, Larmore and in Germany von Kutschera and myself are some of its representatives.
References
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.
Nida-Rümelin, J. (2010). Reasons against naturalizing epistemic reasons. In A. Carsetti (Ed.), Causality, meaningful complexity and embodied cognition (pp. 203–210). Heidelberg: Springer.
Nida-Rümelin, M. (2006). Der Blick von innen. Zur transtemporalen Identität bewusstseinsfähiger Wesen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nida-Rümelin, J. Thomas Nagel: Mind and Cosmos. Why the Materialist, Neo-Darwinian Conception is Almost Certainly False. J Gen Philos Sci 45, 403–406 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-014-9262-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-014-9262-8