Skip to main content
Log in

Limitations of ethical reasoning as an action (praxis) strategy

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For both philosophers and managers, reasoning with ourselves and others can be used both as (1) a way of knowing what is ethical and (2) a way of acting to help ourselves, others and organizations behave ethically. However, for many of us, knowing is frequently not the same as acting. Four areas are addressed: (1) thirteen limitations of ethical reasoning as an action strategy; (2) how a better understanding of these limitations can strengthen ethical reasoning as an action strategy; (3) how an understanding of these limitations can serve as a conceptual foundation for exploring other ethical action strategies; and, (4) implications for experiential learning and teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, R. and Ray Bauer: 1976, Corporate Social Responsiveness, Reston, VA: Reston Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H.: 1964, Eichmann in Jerusalem, New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H.: 1978, The Life of the Mind, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J.: 1936, Language, Truth and Logic.

  • Ayer, A. J.: 1982, Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, N.Y.: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Kurt: 1958, The Moral Point of View. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. and N. Bowie (eds.): 1983, Ethical Theory and Business, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Kenneth M.: 1985, Bibliography of Business Ethics and Business Moral Values, Omaha, Nebraska: Creighton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, Norman: 1982, Business Ethics. Prentice-Hall.

  • Cheney, Sheldon: 1945, Men Who Have Walked with God: The Story of Mysticism Through the Ages Told in the Biographies of Representative Seers and Saints with Excerpts from Their Writings and Sayings, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, Richard T.: 1986, Business Ethics, Macmillan.

  • Donaldson, Thomas: 1982, Corporations and Morality, Prentice-Hall.

  • Donaldson, Thomas and Patrica Werhane (eds.): 1983, Ethical Issues in Business.

  • Ewing, David: 1977, Freedom Inside the Organization, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, David: 1983a, ‘Case of the rogue division’, Harvard Business Review 61, May–June, pp. 166–168f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, David: 1983b, Do It My Way or You're Fired, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, David: 1983c, ‘How to negotiate with employee objectors’, Harvard Business Review, Jan.–Feb., pp. 103–110.

  • Gauthier, David: 1986, Morals by Agreement, Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary vs. U.S. Steel Corporation, 319 A. 2d 174, Supreme Court of Pa.

  • Gewirth, Alan: 1978, Reason and Morality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaberson, W. G.: 1985, ‘Did Searle lose its eyes to a health hazard?’, Business Week, October 14, pp. 120–122.

  • Guthrie, Kenneth Sylvan: 1919, Pythagoras Source Book and Library, Alpine, N.J.

  • Happold, F. C.: 1963, Mysticism: A Study and Anthology, New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M.: 1963, Freedom and Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M.: 1952, 1961, The Language of Morals, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O.: 1970, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W. M. and J. M. Moore (eds.): 1984, Business Ethics, McGraw Hill.

  • Ladwig, Frank: 1986a, Personal conversations and letter.

  • Ladwig, Frank: 1986b, Advanced Consultive Selling for Professionals, Stonington, Conn.: Frank Ladwig and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E.: 1977, Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, Thomas: 1976, An American Company, N.Y.: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, Thomas: 1984, Lecture and discussion at Boston College.

  • Mendelsohn, Bert: 1986, Conversation and letter.

  • Moore, G. E.: 1903, Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monan, J. Donald: 1968, Moral Knowledge and Its Methodology in Aristotle, Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Richard P.: 1984, ‘Toward an action philosophy for managers based on Arendt and Tillich’, Journal of Business Ethics 3, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Richard P.: 1987a, ‘What can managers do about unethical management’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. P.: 1987b, The person involved wishes to remain anonymous.

  • Parfit, Derek: 1984, Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasztor, Andy: 1985, ‘Electrical contractors reel under charges that they rigged bids’, The Wall Street Journal, November 29, 1, 14.

  • Pound, E. T.: 1985, ‘Investigators detect pattern of kickbacks for defense business’, The Wall Street Journal, November 14, 1, 25.

  • Quine, W. V.: 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold, R: 1986, ‘Astronauts’ chief says NASA risked life for schedule’, The New York Times, p. 1, 36.

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1914, ‘Mysticism and logic’, Hibbert Journal, July. Reprinted in Bertrand Russell, Mysticism and Logic, Totowa, New Jersey, Barnes and Noble Books: 1981, pp. 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A.: 1983, Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford: SUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1984, Ethics, Persuasion and Truth, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C.: 1960, Ethics and Language, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, B. L.: 1986, Tough Choices: Managers Talk Ethics, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen: 1961, An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M.: 1982, Business Ethics, Prentice-Hall.

  • Waters, James A.: 1978, ‘Catch 20.5: Corporate morality as an organizational phenomenon’, Organizational Dynamics, Spring, 3–19.

  • Williams, Bernard: Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Cambridge: HUP, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Richard P. Nielsen is a Management Professor in the Department of Organizational Studies, School of Management, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167. Related articles of his include ‘Toward an Action Philosophy for Managers Based on Arendt and Tillich’, Journal of Business Ethics, May 1984, ‘What Can Managers Do about Unethical Management’, Journal of Business Ethics, May 1987, and ‘Cooperative Strategy’, Strategic Management Journal 9, 1988.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, R.P. Limitations of ethical reasoning as an action (praxis) strategy. J Bus Ethics 7, 725–733 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411018

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411018

Keywords

Navigation