Skip to main content
Log in

Nonmonotonicity in (the Metamathematics of) Arithmetic

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to bring together two separated areas of research: classical mathematics and metamathematics on the one side, non-monotonic reasoning on the other. This is done by simulating nonmonotonic “logic” through antitonic theory extensions. In the first half, the specific extension procedure proposed here is motivated informally, partly in comparison with some well-known non-monotonic formalisms. Operators V and, more generally, Uδ are obtained which have some plausibility when viewed as giving nonmonotonic theory extensions. In the second half, these operators are treated from a mathematical and metamathematical point of view. Here an important role is played by Uδ -closed theories and Uδ -fixed points. The last section contains results on V-closed theories which are specific for V.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alchourrón, C. E., P. Gärdenfors, and D. Makinson: 1985, ‘On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. L.: 1978, ‘Negation as Failure’, in Gallaire and Minker (eds.), Logic and Databases, Plenum, New York, pp. 293-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S.: 1962, ‘Transfinite Recursive Progressions of Axiomatic Theories’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 27, 259-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hájek, P. and P. Pudlak: 1993, Metamathematics of First-Order Arithmetic, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J.: 1993, ‘A Critical Reexamination of Default Logic, Autoepistemic Logic and Only Knowing’, in Gottlob, Leitsch, and Mundici (eds.), Computational Logic and Proof Theory, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 713, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, C. F.: 1973, ‘The Relation of A to Prov⌌A⌍ in the Lindenbaum Sentence Algebra’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 38, 295-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marek, W. and M. Truszczynski: 1993, Nonmonotonic Logics; Context-Dependent Reasoning, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T.: 1994, ‘Self-Reference and Incompleteness in a Non-monotonic Setting’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23, 423-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, D. and J. Doyle: 1980, ‘Non-monotonic Logic I’, Artificial Intelligence 13, 41-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C.: 1985, ‘Semantical Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logic’, Artificial Intelligence 25, 75-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebergall, K.-G.: 1996, Zur Metamathematik nichtaxiomatisierbarer Theorien, dissertation, CIS, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R.: 1980, ‘A Logic for Default Reasoning’, Artificial Intelligence 13, 81-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1973, The Coherence Theory of Truth, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (ed.): 1985, Intensional Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smorynski, C.: 1985, Self-Reference and Modal Logic, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1956, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursini, A.: 1978, ‘On the Set of ‘Meaningful’ Sentences of Arithmetic’, Studia Logica 37, 237-241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niebergall, KG. Nonmonotonicity in (the Metamathematics of) Arithmetic. Erkenntnis 50, 309–332 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005505417416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005505417416

Keywords

Navigation