This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Bibliography
Almeder, R., ‘Science and Idealism’,Philosophy of Science 40 (1973), 242–254.
Almeder, R., ‘Fallibilism and the Ultimate Irreversible Opinion’, in N. Rescher (ed.),Studies in Epistemology (APQ Monograph Series No. 9), Blackwell, Oxford, 1975, pp. 33–54.
Aulin-Ahmavaara, Y., ‘A General Theory of Acts, with Application to the Distinction between Rational and Irrational “Social Cognition”, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 8 (1977), 195–220.
Bacon, F.,The New Organon, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1960.
Bernard, C.,An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, Dover, New York, 1957.
Bieri, P., Horstmann, R.-P., and Krüger, L. (eds.),Transcendental Arguments and Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, and London, 1979.
Boas Hall, M.,Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1966.
Bohm, D., Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1957.
Bradie, M., ‘Pragmatism and Internal Realism’,Analysis 39 (1979), 4–10.
Bradley, F. H.,Appearance and Reality, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1893.
Burian, R., ‘Sellarsian Realism and Conceptual Change in Science’, in Bieriet al. (1979), pp. 197–225.
Bury, J. B.,The Idea of Progress, Macmillan, New York, 1932. (Dover, New York, 1955).
Comte, A.,Introduction to Positive Philosophy, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1970.
Cournot, A. A.,An Essay on the Foundations of our Knowledge, The Liberal Arts Press, New York, 1956.
Crombie, A. C., ‘Some Attitudes to Scientific Progress, Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern’,History of Science 13 (1975) 213–230.
Duhem, P.,The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1954.
Duhem, P.,To Save the Phenomena, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1969.
Feyerabend, P.,Against Method, NLB, London, 1975.
de Finetti, B., ‘Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources’, in H. E. Kyburg and H. E. Smokler (eds.),Studies in Subjective Probability, Wiley, New York, 1964, pp. 93–158.
Friedman, J., ‘The Universal Class has a Spinozistic Partitioning’,Synthese 32 (1976), 403–418.
Friedman, M., ‘Truth and Confirmation’,The Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979), 361–382.
Good, I. J.,Estimation of Probabilities, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.
Habermas, J., ‘Wahrheitstheorien’, in H. Fahrenbach (ed.),Wirklichkeit and Reflexion, Pfullingen, 1973, pp. 211–265.
Hallett, M., ‘Towards a Theory of Mathematical Research Programmes’,The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (1979), 1–25.
Harré, R. (ed.),Problems of Scientific Revolution: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.
Henrici, P.,Elements of Numerical Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1964.
Herschel, J.,A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green and Taylor, London, 1831.
Hintikka, J. and Rantala, V., ‘A New Approach to Infinitary Languages’,Annals of Mathematical Logic 10 (1976), 95–115.
Hooker, M., ‘Peirce's Conception of Truth’, in J. C. Pitt (ed.),The Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars: Queries and Extensions, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1978, pp. 129–133.
Hull, D., ‘Laudan's Progress and Its Problems’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (1979), 457–465.
Kaila, E.,Inhimillinen tieto, Otava, Helsinki, 1939.
Kneale, W., ‘Scientific Revolutions for Ever?’,The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (1967), 27–42.
Koethe, J., ‘Putnam's Argument Against Realism’,The Philosophical Review 88 (1979), 92–99.
Krajewski, W.,Correspondence Principle and the Growth of Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1977.
Kuhn, T. S.,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.
Kuhn, T. S.,The Essential Tension, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978.
Lakatos, I., ‘Popper on Demarcation and Induction’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, LaSalle, 1974, pp. 241–273.
Laplace, P. S.,A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, Dover, New York, 1951.
Laudan, L., ‘The Clock Metaphor and Probabilism: The Impact of Descartes on English Methodological Thought, 1650–65’,Annals of Science 22 (1966), 73–104.
Laudan, L., ‘Peirce and the Trivialization of the Self-Correcting Thesis’, in R. N. Giere and R. S. Westfall (eds.), Foundations of Scientific Method: The Nineteenth Century, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1973, pp. 275–306.
Laudan, L.,Progress and Its Problems, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1977.
Laudan, L., ‘The Philosophy of Progress...’, in P. D. Asquith and I. Hacking (eds.),PSA 1978, vol. 2. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, forthcoming in 1980.
Lenin, V. I.,Materialism and Empirio-Criticism, International Publishers, New York, 1927.
Lenz, J., ‘Reichenbach's Defense of Induction’, in M. H. Foster and M. L. Martin (eds.),Probability, Confirmation, and Simplicity, The Odyssey Press, New York, 1966, pp. 435–440.
Levi, I., ‘Acceptance Revisited’, in R. J. Bogdan (ed.),Local Induction, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1976, pp. 1–71.
Levi, I., ‘Truth, Fallibility, and the Growth of Knowledge’, forthcoming 1980.
Levi, I., ‘Induction as Self Correcting According to Peirce’, forthcoming in D. H. Mellor (ed.), Science, Belief, and Behaviour, Cambridge, 1980.
Lugg, A., ‘Laudan and the Problem-Solving Approach to Scientific Progress and Rationality’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (1979), 466–474.
Mach, E.,Knowledge and Error, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1976.
Martin, G.,Leibniz: Logic and Metaphysics, Barnes & Noble, New York, 1967.
Miller, D., ‘Popper's Qualitative Theory of Verisimilitude’,The Britith Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1974), 166–177.
Molland, A. G., ‘Medieval Ideas of Scientific Progress’,Journal of the History of Ideas 39 (1978), 561–578.
Monk, J. D.,Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1976.
Musgrave, A., ‘Problems with Progress’,Synthese 42 (1979), 443–464.
Niiniluoto, I., ‘Inquiries, Problems, and Questions: Remarks on Local Induction’, in R. J. Bogdan (ed.),Local Induction, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1976, pp. 263–296.
Niiniluoto, I., ‘On the Truthlikeness of Generalizations’, in R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.),Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1977, pp. 121–147.
Niiniluoto, I., ‘Notes on Popper as Follower of Whewell and Peirce’,Ajatus 37 (1978), 272–327.[1978a.]
Niiniluoto, I., ‘On the Realist Theory of Scientific Progress’,Section Papers, 16th World Congress of Philosophy, Düsseldorf, 1978, pp. 463–466. [1978b.]
Niiniluoto, I., ‘Verisimilitude, Theory-Change, and Scientific Progress’, in I. Niiniluoto and R. Tuomela (eds.),The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change (Acta Philosophica Fennica 30, 1978), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 243–264. [1978c.)
Niiniluoto, I., ‘Truthlikeness: Comments on Recent Discussion’,Synthese 38 (1978), 281–330. [1978d.]
Niiniluoto, I., ‘Degrees of Truthlikeness: From Singular Sentences to Generalizations’,The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (1979), 371–376.
Niiniluoto, I., ‘The Growth of Theories: Comments of the Structuralist Approach’, forthcoming inProceedings of Second International Congress for History and Philosophy of Science, Pisa, 1978, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980.
Niiniluoto, I., ‘On Truth and Argumentation in Legal Dogmatics', to appear inRechtstheorie 1980.
Niiniluoto, I., ‘Inductive Logic as a Methodological Research Programme’, forthcoming inScientia 1981.
Nowak, L., ‘Relative Truth, the Correspondence Principle, and Absolute Truth’,Philosophy of Science 42 (1975), 187–202.
Nowak, L., ‘Essence-Idealization-Praxis’,Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 2 (1976), 1–28.
Peirce, C. S.,Collected Papers (ed. by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1931-35.
Popper, K. R., ‘Some Comments on Truth and the Growth of Knowledge, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.),Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1962, pp. 285–292.
Popper, K. R.,Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1963.
Popper, K. R.,Objective Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972.
Popper, K. R., ‘The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions’, in Harre (1975), pp. 72–101.
Putnam, H.,Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1978.
Quay, P. M., ‘Progress as a Demarcation Criterion for the Sciences’,Philosophy of Science 41 (1974), 154–170.
Quine, W. V. O.,Word and Object, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.
Radnitzky, G. and Andersson, G.,Progress and Rationality in Science, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1978.
Radnitzky, G. and Andersson, G. (eds.),The Structure and Development of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979.
Randall, J. H. and Buchler, J.,Philosophy: An Introduction, Barnes & Noble, New York, 1942.
Ravetz, J., ‘...et augebitur scientia’, in Harré (1975), pp. 42–57.
Reichenbach, H.,Theory of Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1949.
Rescher, N.,The Coherence Theory of Truth, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1973.
Rescher, N.,Methodological Pragmatism, Blackwell, Oxford, 1977.
Rescher, N.,Scientific Progress, Blackwell, Oxford, 1978. [1978a.]
Rescher, N.,Peirce's Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1978. [19786.]
Rescher, N., ‘Some Issues Regarding the Completeness of Science and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge’, in Radnitzky and Andersson (1979), pp. 19–40.
Rorty, R., ‘From Epistemology to Hermeneutics’, in I. Niiniluoto and R. Tuomela (eds.),The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change (Acta Philosophica Fennica30, 1978), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.
Rosenberg, J.,Linguistic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1974.
de Santillana, G.,The Age of Adventure: The Renaissance Philosophers, Mentor Books, The New American Library, New York, 1956.
Sarton, G.,The Study of the History of Science, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1936. (Dover, New York, 1957.)
Savage, L. J.,The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1954. (Dover, New York, 1972.)
Sellars, W.,Science and Metaphysics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1968.
Shimony, A., ‘Comments on Two Epistemological Theses of Thomas Kuhn’, in R. S. Cohen et al. (eds.),Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1976, pp. 569–588.
Skagestad, P., ‘C. S. Peirce on Biological Evolution and Scientific Progress’,Synthese 41 (1979), 85–114.
Sober, E.,Simplicity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975.
Stegmüller, W.,The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York and Heidelberg, 1976.
Tichý, P., ‘On Popper's Definition of Verisimilitude’,The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1974), 155–160.
Whewell, W.,Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Parker and Sons, London, 1840. (Reprinted 1967.)
Vigier, J.-P., ‘The Concept of Probability in the Frame of the Probabilistic and the Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, in S. Körner (ed.),Observation and Interpretation, Butterworth, London, 1957, pp. 71–77.
von Wright, G. H.,The Logical Problem of Induction, 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford, 1957.
Zilsel, E., ‘The Genesis of the Concept of Scientific Progress’,The Journal of the History of Ideas 6 (1945), 325–349.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niiniluoto, I. Scientific progress. Synthese 45, 427–462 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221787
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221787