Abstract
The sociology of research and knowledge use, argue the authors, could be a way of linking important parts of sociology, such as organization studies, the sociology of science to each other. In the article, they discuss the idea that organizational responses to environments are related to research utilization. Based upon an empirical investigation of city welfare departments, four empirical “utilization strategies” are presented and shown to be related to power and control patterns. While negative utilization strategies are hostile to uncontrolled research utilization and enhance the formation of bureaucratic expertise, conflict-oriented strategies are discursively productive and reinforce research use and alliance formation with social scientists to control the environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergmark, A., Oscarsson, L. (1988).Drug abuse and treatment. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.
Böhme, G., van den Daele, W., Krohn, W. (1973). Die Finalisierung der Wissenschaft.Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2(2), 128–144.
Brante, Th. (1989). Empirical and epistemological issues in scientists’ explanations of scientific stances: a critical synthesis.Social epistemology, 3(4), 261–295.
Brante, Th. and Elzinga, A. (1990). Controversy studies: A research program.Science Studies, no. 2.
Dunn, W.N. (1980). The two-communities metaphor and models of knowledge use.Knowledge, 1(4), 515–536.
Elzinga, A. (1985). Research, bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria. In Wittrock, B. and Elzinga, A. (Eds.).The university research system. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Engelhardt, T. and Caplan, A. (Eds.). (1987).Scientific controversies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ericson, B. and Johansson, B-M. (1990).Att bygga på kunskap. Användning av smhällsvetenskaplig FoU inom byggsektorn. Report 3:1990. Stockholm: National Board of Building Research.
Foucault, M. (1977).Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1980). Prison talk.Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
Gilbert, N. and Mulkay, M. (1985).Opening Pandora’s box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hasenfeld, Y. (1983).Human service organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hoffman, L. (1989).The Politics of Knowledge. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Larsen, J. (1980). Knowledge Utilization. What Is It?Knowledge, 1(3), 421–442.
Lazarsfeld, P., Sewell, W. and Wilensky, H. (1967). Introduction. In Lazarsfeld, Sewell and Wilensky (Eds.).The uses of sociology. NY: Basic Books.
Lindblom, C. (1986). Who needs what social research for policymaking.Knowledge, 7(4), 345–366.
Lindblom, C. and D. Cohen (1979).Usable knowledge. Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Machlup, F. (1979). Uses, value and benefits of knowledge.Knowledge, 1(1), 62–81.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1976).Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
Marin, B. (1981). What is “half-knowledge” sufficient for—and when?Knowledge, 3, 43–60.
Meyer, J. (1983). Innovation and knowledge use in American public education. In Meyer, J. and Scott, R. (Eds.)Environments and organizations. Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1983). The structure of educational organizations. In Meyer, J. and Scott, R. (Eds.).Environments and organizations. Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Meyer, J. and R. Scott (Eds.) (1983).Environments and organizations. Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Meyer, J., Scott, R. and Deal, T. (1983). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. Meyer, J. and Scott, R. (Eds.).Environments and organizations. Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Nelkin, D. (Ed.) (1979).Controversy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Nilsson, K. (1992a). Utilization patterns and strategies in three policy sectors.Science Studies 5(1), 29–46.
Nilsson, K. (1992 b).Policy, interest and power. Studies in strategies of research utilization. Dissertation, School of Social Work, Lund University.
Nilsson, K. and S. Sunesson (1988).Konflikt, kontroll, expertis. Att använda social forskning. Lund Studies in Social Welfare, I. Arkiv: Lund.
Nilsson, K. and Sunesson, S. (1993).Strategy, tactics and maneuvering. Utilization of social research in three policy sectors. Submitted for publication.
Nowotny, H. (1982).Nützliches Wissen—Verwertung sozialwissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse in Abhängigkeit wechslender Konfliktfelder. Berlin, Mimeo.
Perrow, C. (1978). Demystifying organizations. In Sarri, R. and Hasenfeld, Y. (Eds.).The management of human services, pp. 105–120. NY: Columbia.
Ryan, B. and N.C. Gross (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities.Rural Sociology, 8.
SOU 1987:22.Missbrukarna. Socialtjänsten. Tvånget. Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget.
Sunesson, S. (1985). Outside the goal paradigm: power and structured patterns of non-rationality.Organization Studies, 6, 229–246.
Sunesson, S. (1989). When knowledge ends and power begins. In Elzinga, A., Nolin, J., Pranger, and Sunesson, S. (Eds.).In science we trust. Moral and political issues of science in society. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Sunesson, S. (In press). Comparing tool controversies, in Th. Brante and Steve Fuller, eds.Science studied Binghamton, NY: SUNY Press.
Sunesson, S. and Nilsson, K. (1988). Explaining research utilization: Beyond “functions”.Knowledge, 10(2), 140–155.
Sunesson, S., Nilsson, K., Ericson, B. and B-M. Johansson (1989). Intervening factors in the utilization of social research.Knowledge in Society, 2(1), 42–56.
Thompson, J.D. (1967).Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Weick, K.E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
Weiss, C. (1977). Introduction. In Weiss, C. and Bucuvalas, M., (Eds.).Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Weiss, C. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization.Public Administration Review, Sept./Oct. issue.
Weiss, C. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion,Knowledge, 1, 381–404.
Weiss, C. (1981). Use of social science research in organizations: The constrained repertoire theory. In Stein, H. (Ed.).Organization and the human services. Philadelphia: Temple.
Weiss, C. (1987). Congressional committee staffs (do/do not) use analysis. In Bulmer, M. (Ed.).Social science research and government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weymann, A., Ellermann, L. and Wingens, M. (1986). A research programme on the utilization of the social sciences. In Heller, F. (Ed.).The use and abuse of social science. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Whitley, R. (1984).The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon.
Wittrock, B. (1984). Social science into social policy. In Nowotny, H. (Ed.).Social concerns for the 1980s. Wien: Eurosocial.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Kjell Nilsson presented his dissertation on research utilization in different policy sectors at Lund University in February 1992. He has written and cowritten one book and several articles in the field of knowledge and bureaucracy.
Sune Sunesson, Ph.D., is currently professor and head of the research department and Ph.D., program in the School of Social Work at Lund University. He has written several books and articles in the field of bureaucracy studies, the sociology of human service organizations and the utilization of knowledge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson, K., Sunesson, S. Conflict or control: Research utilization strategies as power techniques. Know Techn Pol 6, 23–36 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825978
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825978