Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T12:16:07.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plutarch's Quaestiones Graecae, No. 24

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I do not propose to enter into a discussion of the real significance of κριθ⋯ς διδ⋯ναι, but only to point to the fact that it is casually connected with purificatory ceremonies. Such a discussion would involve a discussion of the Eleusinian ⋯παρχ⋯, etc. The sense was probably different in different cases. If in this case it had a purificatory purpose, Samter's interpretation of the καταχ⋯σμαγα in his Familienfeste der Griechen und Römer, 1901, may be compared, though I am not certain that he hits the mark.

2 Stengel's, contention, Griech. Kultusaltertümer, 3rd editionGoogle Scholar, p. 146, that the περ⋯ειπνο took place on the third day is due to a misinterpretation of Lucian, , De luctu, 24.Google Scholar The best information is given by the comic poet Hegesippus in Athenaeus, VII., p. 290 c; cf. Heraclides Ponticus, Polit. 30, 2.