Skip to main content
Log in

Defending a Possible-Worlds Account of Indicative Conditionals

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One very popular kind of semantics for subjunctive conditionals is aclosest-worlds account along the lines of theories given by David Lewisand Robert Stalnaker. If we could give the same sort of semantics forindicative conditionals, we would have a more unified account of themeaning of ``if ... then ...'' statements, one with manyadvantages for explaining the behaviour of conditional sentences. Such atreatment of indicative conditionals, however, has faced a battery ofobjections. This paper outlines a closest-worlds account of indicativeconditionals that does better than some of its cousins in explaining thebehaviour of such conditionals. The paper then discusses objectionsoffered by Dorothy Edgington and Frank Jackson to closest-worldsaccounts of indicative conditionals, and shows that these objections canbe met by the account outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, E.W. (1975): The Logic of Conditionals, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W.A. (1979): ‘Indicative and Subjunctive Conditionals’, Philosophical Review 88(4), 544–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, D. (1986):‘Do Conditionals Have Truth-Conditions?’, Critica 18(52), 3–30. Reprinted in Jackson, 1991, pp. 176–201. Page numbers given are for the Jackson collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, D. (1995):‘On Conditionals’, Mind 104(414), 235–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ells, E. and Skyrms, B. (eds.) (1994): Probability and Conditionals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. (1980):‘Two Recent Theories of Conditionals’, in W. Harper, R. Stalnaker and G. Pearce (eds.), Ifs (pp. 211–247), Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. (1975):‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajek, A. (1994):‘Triviality on the Cheap?’, in E. Ells and B. Skyrms (eds.), Probability and Conditionals (pp. 113–139),Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajek, A. and Hall, N. (1994):‘The Hypothesis of the Conditional Construal of Conditional Probability’, in E. Ells and B. Skyrms (eds.), Probability and Conditionals (pp. 75–112), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (1987): Conditionals, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (ed.) (1991): Conditionals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1980): Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. (1973): Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. (1976):‘Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’, Philosophical Review 85, 297–315. Reprinted in Lewis 1986a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. (1986a): Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. (1986b):‘Postscript to Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’, in D.K. Lewis (ed.), Philosophical Papers, vol. 2 (pp. 152–156), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. (1996):‘Elusive Knowledge’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74(4), 549–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W.G. (2001): Real Conditionals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, Vann. (1985):‘A Counterexample to Modus Ponens’, Journal of Philosophy 82, 462–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, D. (1997):‘ImpossibleWorlds: AModestApproach’,Notre Dame Journal for Formal Logic 38(4), 535–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1968):‘A Theory of Conditionals’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, no.2 (pp. 98–112), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1975):‘Indicative Conditionals’, Philosophia 5, 269–286. Reprinted in Jackson, 1991, pp. 136–154. Page numbers given are for the Jackson collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. and Thomason, R. (1968):‘A Semantic Analysis of Conditional Logic’, Theoria 36, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Frassen, B. (1976):‘Probabilities of Conditionals’, in W.L. Harper and C.A. Hooker (eds.), Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, Vol 1 (pp. 261–308), Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherson, Brian (2001):‘Indicatives and Subjunctives’, Philosophical Quarterly 51, 200–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nolan, D. Defending a Possible-Worlds Account of Indicative Conditionals. Philosophical Studies 116, 215–269 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000007243.60727.d4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000007243.60727.d4

Keywords

Navigation