Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Brain-Paradox” and “Embeddment” – Do We Need a “Philosophy of the Brain”?

  • Published:
Brain and Mind

Abstract

Present discussions in philosophy of mind focuson ontological and epistemic characteristics ofmind and on mind-brain relations. In contrast,ontological and epistemic characteristics ofthe brain have rarely been thematized. Rather,philosophy seems to rely upon an implicitdefinition of the brain as "neuronal object''and "object of recognition'': henceontologically and epistemically distinct fromthe mind, characterized as "mental subject'' and"subject of recognition''. This leads to the"brain-paradox''. This ontological and epistemicdissociation between brain and mind can beconsidered central for the problems of mind andmind-brain relations that have yet to beresolved in philosophy. The brain itself hasnot been thematized epistemically andontologically, leading to a "brain problem''.The epistemic and ontological dissociationbetween brain and mind presupposes an"isolated'' picture of the brain, characterizedby context-independence (i.e. "isolation'' frombody and environment). We can describe thisview as an extrinsic relationship betweenbrain, body and environment. However, based onrecent empirical findings about body image andphantom sensations, we can no longer considerthe brain as context-independent or "isolated''from its bodily and environmental context.Instead, the brain must be considered"embedded''. Within the context of 'embeddment',brain and bodily/environmental context seemmutually to determine each other, and hence bereciprocally dependent on each other. We candescribe this as an intrinsic relationshipbetween brain, body and environment.Defining the brain as "embedded'' undermines theepistemic and ontological dissociation betweenbrain and mind and consequently resolves the"brain-paradox''. This resolution sheds novellight on problems of mind and mind-brainrelations by relativizing both. It is thereforeconcluded that philosophy should thematizeontological and epistemic characteristics ofthe brain, thereby taking into account the"brain problem'' and developing a "philosophy ofthe brain''. This approach not only opens a newfield in philosophy but also extends the focusof empirical investigation in the neurosciencesto take into account the intrinsic relationshipbetween brain, body and environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berlucchi, G. and Aglioti, S., 1997: The body in the brain: Neural bases of corporeal awareness, Trends in Neurosciences 20(2), 560-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birbaumer, N., Lutzenberger, W., Larbig, W., Unertl, K., Töpfner, S., Grodd, W., Taub, E. and Flor, H., 1997: Effects of regional anesthesia on phantom limb pain are mirroed in changes in cortical reorganization, J of Neuroscience 17(14), 5503-5508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., 1997: Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., 1999: An embodied cognitive science, Trends in Cognitive Science 3(9), 345-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., 1993: Phantom sensation, phantom pain, and stump pain, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74, 79-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deecke, L., 1996: Motor initation and imagination, Cognitive Brain Research 13, 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, S., Rockstroh, B. and Taub, E., 1995: Increased cortical representation of fingers of the left hand in string players, Science 270, 305-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flor, H., Elbert, T., Knecht, S., Wienbruch, C., Pantec, C., Birbaumer, N., Larbig, W. and Taub, N., 1995: Phantom limb pain as a perceptual correlate of massive cortical reorganisation in upper extremity amputees, Nature 375, 482-484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hari, R., Hänninen R., Mäkinen, T., Jousmäki, V., Forss, N., Seppä, M. and Salonen, O., 1998: Three hands: Fragmentation of human bodily awareness, Neuroscience Letters 240, 131-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzel, A., 1998: Phantomerlebnisse und Qualia. Philosophische Magisterarbeit an der Universität Düsseldorf.

  • Henderson, W.R. and Smyth, G.E., 1948: Phantom limbs, J of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2, 88-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahi, M. and Frith, C., 1998: Willed acton and its impairments, Cognitive Neuropsychology 15, 483-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M., 1997: The cognitive Neuroscience of Action, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T.S., Borge, K., Nielsen, J. and Rasmussen, P., 1984: Non-painful phantom limb phenomena in amputee: Incidence, clinical characteristics and tmeporal course, Acta Neurologica Scand 70, 407-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knecht, S., Hennigsen, H., Elbert, T., Flor, H., Höhling, C., Pantev, C. and Taub, E., 1996: Reorganisation and perceptual changes after amputation, Brain 119, 1213-1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knecht, S., Hennigsen, H., Höhling, C., Elbert, T., Flor, H., Pantev, C. and Taub, E., 1998: Plasticity of plasticity? Changes in the pattern of perceptual correlates or reorganisation after amputation, Brain 121, 717-724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knecht, S. and Ringelstein, E.B., 1999: Neuronale plastizität des soamtosensorischen Systems, Der Nervenarzt 70, 889-898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlenbeck, H., 1960: Schopenhauers Bedeutung für die Neurologie, Nervenarzt 32, 177-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlenbeck, H., 1965: The concept of consciousness in neurological epistemology, in J. Smythies (ed.), Brain and Mind, Routledge Publisher, London, pp. 137-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlenbeck, H., 1972:Schopenhauers Satz “DieWelt ist meine Vorstellung” und das Traumerlebnis, in E. Buchev, E. Payne and K. Kurth (eds), Von der Aktualität Schopenhauers, Kramer Publisher, Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlenbeck, H., 1982: The human brain and its universe. Bd. 1: The world of natural sciences and its phenomenology. Bd. 2: The brain and its mind. Basel.

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1999: Philosophy in the Flesh, California University Press.

  • Lotze, M., Grodd, W., Birbaumer, N., Erb, M., Huse, E. and Flor, H., 1999: Does the use of a yoelectric prothesis prevent cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain? Nature neuroscience 2(6), 501-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R., 1989: Phantom limbs, the self and the brain, Can Psychology 30, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R., 1992: Phantom limbs, Scientifc American, 90-96.

  • Metzinger, T., 1997: Ich-Störungen als pathologische Formen mentaler Selbstmodellierung, in G. Northoff (HG), pp. 169-191.

  • Northoff, G., 1997: Neuropsychiatrie und Neurophilosophie, Schöningh Publisher, Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northoff, G., 2000: Are Q-memories delusions? A neurophilosophical approach, Philosophical Psychology 63, 199-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northoff, G., 2000: Das Gehirn: Eine neurophilosophische Bestandsaufnahme, Mentis Publisher, Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northoff, G., 2001: Philosophy of the brain. Hypothesis of “embedment”, in revision.

  • Northoff, G., Richter, A, Gessner, M., Witzel, T., Schlagenhauf, F., Koetter, R., Bogerts, B. and Heinze, H.J., 2000: Functional dissociation between medial orbitofrontal and lateral prefrontal cortex during emotional processing: A combined fMRI-MEG study, Cerebral Cortex 10, 98-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W., 1976: The Ways of Paradox. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V.S., 1990: What neurological syndrome can tell us about human nature, Cold Spring Habrour Sympsoia on Biology, Vol LXI, Cold Spring Habrour Laboratory Press.

  • Ramachandran, V.S., 1993: Behavioral and MEG correlates of neural plasticity in the adult human brain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Scie. 90, 10413-10420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D. and Cobb, S., 1995: Touching the phantom limb, Nature 377, 489-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V.S. and Rogers-Ramachandran, D., 1996: Synesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors, Proc Royal Society of London 262, 377-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V.S. and Blakeslee, S., 1998: Phantoms in the Brain, New York.

  • Ribbers, G., Mulder, T. and Rijken, R., 1989: The phantom phenomenon: A critical review, Int J of Rehabilitation Res. 12(2), 175-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddoch, G., 1949: Phantom limbs and body shape, Brain 64, 197-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, O., 1985: The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat. Inc. New York.

  • Schopenhauer, A., 1977: Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, Diogenes Publisher, Zuerich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S., 1984: Identity, Cause and Mind: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge.

  • Thelen, E. and Smith, L., 1994: A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, T., 1998: The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science, Behavioral and Brain Science 21, 615-665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, M., Goodbody, S.J. and Husain, M., 1998: Maintaining internal representations: The role of the human superior parietal lobe, Nature Neuroscience 1(6), 529-533.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioral Neurology, Harvard University, Beth Israel Hospital, Kirstein Building KS 454, Brookline Avenue 330, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    G. Northoff

Authors
  1. G. Northoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Northoff, G. “Brain-Paradox” and “Embeddment” – Do We Need a “Philosophy of the Brain”?. Brain and Mind 2, 195–211 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012402104790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012402104790

Search

Navigation