Ethical Issues in Mitigation of Climate Change: The Option of Reduced Meat Production and Consumption

47Citations
Citations of this article
190Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper I discuss ethical issues related to mitigation of climate change. In particular, I focus on mitigation of climate change to the extent this change is caused by livestock production. I support the view-on which many different ethical approaches converge-that the present generation has a moral obligation to mitigate climate change for the benefit of future generations and that developed countries should take the lead in the process. Moreover, I argue that since livestock production is an important contributing factor to climate change, we should undertake mitigation measures also in this sector and not only in, for example, the transport and energy sectors. However, technological solutions do not seem sufficient in the livestock sector, leaving us with the option of reduced meat production and consumption. In order to reach significant results in mitigation of climate change, political steering seems necessary. With this in mind, I argue in favor of a tax on meat consumption. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nordgren, A. (2012). Ethical Issues in Mitigation of Climate Change: The Option of Reduced Meat Production and Consumption. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(4), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9335-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free