Skip to main content

The Time Coordinate in Einstein’s Restricted Theory of Relativity

  • Chapter
The Study of Time

Summary

After drawing some preliminary divisions between different conceptions of time, distinguished as “proper time”, “Kantian time”, “psychological time”, “physical time”, and “mathematical time”, there follows a discussion of time dilatation and the clock paradoxes of Einstein’s restricted theory of relativity. Beginning with Lorentz’s time transformations, and some remarks on the different attitudes of Lorentz, Poincaré, and Einstein to the transformation equations generally, we turn to the clock paradox, often held to involve Einstein in inconsistency. A new notation is introduced, which not only simplifies the manipulation of the Lorentz transformation equations, but which makes it natural to preserve certain terms which are commonly suppressed unknowingly. The notation makes clear what has long been appreciated by some, but denied by others, namely, that the time dilatation equations, correctly expressed, are consistent under a suitable interpretation (and not merely mathematically consistent). Different attempts to engender contradiction within Einstein’s theory are considered, in particular by taking more than two observers, moving uniformly. Necessarily we introduce the notion of an aggregate proper time of two observers, which may not satisfy those looking for a solution to the problem of actual space travellers. There are also difficult problems of specifying what is to count as a journey, under this interpretation. Nevertheless, there is here no sign of the inconsistency in the interpretation of Einstein’s theory for which some writers have argued. Where there is an asymmetry in the aggregate times experienced, there is also an asymmetry in the observers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eleven important papers on relativity, including Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper (Einstein, 1905), Raum und Zeit (Minkowski, 1908), and two earlier papers by Lorentz (1895 and 1904) are readily available in English translation in “The Principle of Relativity”, London, Methuen, 1923, reprinted by Dover subsequently. The translation was made from the German edition “Das Relativitätsprinzip”, 4th edition, Teubner, 1922. References below are to the English edition, abbreviated as P. R.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hermann Weyl’s Raum, Zeit, Materie is available in English translation, unfortunately from the fourth German edition of 1921, rather than the fifth, with the title SpaceTimeMatter, London, Methuen, 1921, subsequently reprinted by Dover. For A. S. Eddington, see especially The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 1924, p. 26: “the contraction [of a moving rod] and retardation [of a moving clock] do not imply any absolute change in the rod and clock. The ‘configuration of events’ constituting the four-dimensional structure which we call a rod is unaltered; all that happens is that the observer’s space and time partitions cross it in a different direction”.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 2nd edition, 1787, I. ii. 7 (b).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., I. ii. 7 (a).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., I. ii. 5 (1–2). This did not mean that it had absolute reality in the sense of inher­ing in things as a condition or property. Ibid., I. ii. 7 (c).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., I. ii. 7 (b).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., I. ii. 5 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whitrow, G. J.: The Natural Philosophy of Time. London: Nelson, 1961, chapter 4.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. See note 7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Theory of conjugate functions, or algebraic couples; with a preliminary and elementary essay on algebra as the science of pure time (read in 1833 and 1835), Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, Vol. 17 (1837) pp. 293–422. Cf. p. 297: “The notion of intuition of ORDER IN TIME is not less but more deep-seated in the human mind, than the notion or intuition of ORDER IN SPACE ; and a mathematical Science may be founded on the former, as pure and demonstrative as the Science founded on the latter”. Since Hamilton hoped to derive algebra from a prior intuition of time, this was not strictly mathematical in the sense used here.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For an ample bibliography of relativity, see the references given in E. T. Whittaker’s History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Vol. 2. London: Nelson 1953, chapter 2. Lorentz’s paper of 1904 (not 1903, as given in error by Whittaker) is printed in P. R.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aether and Matter, Cambridge University Press, 1900, chapter 11, especially pp. 167–77.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See in particular Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 68 (1928), pp. 385–8, and Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3, London: McMillan 1931, pp. 181 to the end. These lectures on relativity date from 1910–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Op. cit. (note 11), p. 177. .

    Google Scholar 

  15. Op. cit. (1931, note 12), p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. R., pp. 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. That the criticism did not pass unnoticed is suggested by Bishop Barne’s Scientific Theory and Religion, Cambridge University Press, 1933, p. 114, for example.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naturwiss., Vol. 6 (1918), p. 697.

    Google Scholar 

  19. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 15 (1964), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loc. cit. (note 18).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nature, Vol. 168 (1951), p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scientific Theory and Religion, (The Gifford Lectures, 1927–1929), Cambridge Univerversity Press, 1933, p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 Springer-Verlag, Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

North, J.D. (1972). The Time Coordinate in Einstein’s Restricted Theory of Relativity. In: Fraser, J.T., Haber, F.C., Müller, G.H. (eds) The Study of Time. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65387-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65387-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-65389-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-65387-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics