Skip to main content
Log in

Roger Swyneshed’s Obligationes: A Logical Game of Inference Recognition?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In [Dutilh Novaes, Medieval-obligations as logical Games of Consistency maintenance, synthese, (2004)], I proposed a reconstruction of Walter Burley’s theory of obligationes, based on the idea that Burley’s theory of obligationes could be seen as a logical game of consistency maintenance. In the present paper, I intend to test the game hypothesis on another important theory of obligationes, namely Roger Swyneshed’s theory. In his treatise on obligationes [edited by P.V. Spade, cf. Spade History and philosophy of Logic 3(1982) 1-32], Swyneshed introduced significant modifications to the general framework of obligationes. To compare the two theories, I apply the same formal apparatus used in the previous paper. It will become patent that Swyneshed’s theory is considerably different from Burley’s, among other reasons because the dynamic aspects that play a major role in the latter are simply not present in the former. My conclusion is that Swyneshed’s version of obligationes is not directed towards consistency maintenance, but rather towards inference recognition, and that it is, from a game-theoretical perspective, less interesting a theory than Burley’s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E.J. Ashworth (1981) ArticleTitle‘The Problems of Relevance and Order in Obligational Disputations: Some Late Fourteenth Century Views’ Medioevo 7 175–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J.: 1993, ‘Ralph Strode on Inconsistency in Obligational Disputations’, In K. Jacobi (ed.), Argumentationstheorie, Leiden, Brill, pp. 363-386.

  • Ashworth, E. J.: 1996, ‘Autour des Obligationes de Roger Swyneshed: la Nova Responsio’, Les Etudes Philosophiques 3.

  • Dutilh Novaes, C.: 2004, ‘Medieval Obligationes as Logical Games of Consistency Maintenance’, Synthese, forthcoming.

  • Keffer, H.: 2001, De Obligationibus-Rekonstruktion einer spätmittelalterlichen Disputationstheorie, Leiden, Brill.

  • C. J. Martin (2001) ‘Obligations and Liars’ M. Yrjönsuuri (Eds) Medieval Formal Logic Kluwer Acadamic publishers Dordrecht 63–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade, P. V.: 1978 ‘Roger Swyneshed’s Obligationes: Edition and Comments’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age(1977). (Paris, 1978), pp. 243-285.

  • P.V. Spade (1982) ArticleTitle‘Three Theories of Obligationes: Burley, Kilvington and Swyneshed on Counterfactual Reasoning’ History and Philosophy of Logic 3 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Stump (1981) ArticleTitle‘Roger Swyneshed’s Theory of Obligation’ Medioevo 7 135–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Yrjönsuuri, M.: 1993, ‘The Role of Casus in some Fourteenth Century Treatises on Sophismata and Obligations’, in K. Jacobi (ed.), Argumentationstheorie, Leiden, Brill, pp. 301-322.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novaes, C.D. Roger Swyneshed’s Obligationes: A Logical Game of Inference Recognition?. Synthese 151, 125–153 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-2248-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-2248-z

Keywords

Navigation