Abstract
It is demonstrated that Maxwellian electrodynamics was created as a result of the old pre-Maxwellian programmes’s reconciliation: the electrodynamics of Ampère–Weber, the wave theory of Young–Fresnel and Faraday’s programme. Maxwell’s programme finally superseded the Ampère–Weber one because it assimilated the ideas of the Ampère–Weber programme, as well as the presuppositions of the programmes of Young–Fresnel and Faraday. Maxwell’s victory became possible because the core of Maxwell’s unification strategy was formed by Kantian epistemology. Maxwell put forward as a basic synthetic principle an idea that radically differed from that of rival approaches by its open, flexible and contra-ontological character. “Action at a distance”, “incompressible fluid”, “molecular vortices” were contrived analogies for Maxwell, capable only of directing the researcher to the “right” mathematical relations Kantian epistemology subsequently enabled Helmholtz and Hertz to arrive at a version of Maxwell’s theory that served as a heuristical basis for the discovery of radio waves. Finally, though neither of Einstein’s relativistic ideas came directly from Kant, they were made possible by the Kantian worldview that had permeated Einstein’s thinking. The Maxwellian revolution can be described in terms of Habermas’s communicative rationality encouraging the establishment of mutual understanding between the various scientific communities. Maxwell’s programme constituted a progressive step in respect to its rivals because it constituted a basis of communication and interpenetration between the main paradigms of 19th century physics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achinstein, P. (2010). What to do if you want to defend a theory you cannot prove: A method of “physical speculation”. The Journal of Philosophy, 107, 35–55.
Audi, R. (Ed.). (1999). The cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things woth words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beller, M. (2000). Kant’s impact on Einstein’s thought. In D. Howard & J. Stachel (Eds.), Einstein: The formative years, 1879–1909. Boston: Birkhauser. Chapter 4.
Boltzmann, L. (1895). Über Faraday’s Kraftlinien, von James Clerk Maxwell. Herausgegeben von. L. Boltzmann. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
Born, M. (1971). The Born-Einstein letters: Correspondence between Albert Einstein and Max and Hedwig Born from 1916 to 1955. I. Born translation. NY: Walker and Company.
Buchwald, J. (1994). The creation of scientific effects: Heinrich Hertz and electric waves. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, L., & Garnett, W. (1882). The life of James Clerk Maxwell. L. Macmillan.
Chalmers, A. (2007). What is this thing called science? University of Queensland Press.
Chalmers, A. (2001). Maxwell, mechanism and the nature of electricity. Physics in Perspective, 3(4), 425–438.
D’Agostino, S. (1975). Hertz’s researches on electromagnetic waves. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 6, 261–323.
D’Agostino, S. (1984). Maxwell’s dimensional approach to the velocity of light: rise and fall of a paradigm. In D’Agostino, S., & Petruccioli, S. (Eds.) Mathematical models and physical theories. Rome: Academia nazionale Della Scienze.
Darrigol, O. (2001). Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Einstein, A. (1905a) Über eine die Erzeugung und verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden hewristischen Lesictpunkt. Annalen der Physik 17, 132–48. Translated by Anna Beck. In: The collected papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 1. The early years, 1879–1902. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1987.
Einstein, A. (1905b) Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Annalen der Physik 17, 891–921. English translation. In The principle of relativity, Dover, New York, 1923. See also the translation of Anna Beck. In The collected papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 2. The Swiss years: writings, 1900–1909. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1989, pp. 140–171.
Einstein, A. (1909) Über die Entwicklung unserer Anschaungen uber das Wesen und die Konstitution der Strahlung. Physikalische Zeitschrift 10, 817–825. Translated by Anna Beck. In The collected papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 1. The early years, 1879–1902. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1987.
Einstein, A. (1931). Maxwell’s influence on the evolution of the idea of physical reality. In James Clerk Maxwell: A commemorative volume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Einstein, A. (1949). Autobiographical notes. In: Schlipp, P.A. (Ed.). Albert Einstein: philosopher scientist, vol.1, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, pp. 3–94.
Einstein, A (1987). The collected papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 1. The early years, 1879–1902. In Stachel, J. et al. (Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Feuer, L. (1974). Einstein and the generations of science. NY: Basic Books. Inc.
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R., & Sands, M. (1964). The Feynman lectures on physics, 2 edn. Addison Wesley; 2005.
Galison, P. (1987). How experiments end. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Habermas, J. (1987) An alternative way out of the philosophy of the subject: Communicative versus subject-centered reason. In The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1995). The theory of communicative action. Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.
Harman, P. (2001). The natural philosophy of J.C. Maxwell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Helmholtz, H. [1870] Wissenschaftlische Abhandlungen, Barth, 1882, vol. 1, pp. 611–628.
Hertz, H. [1884]. On the relations between Maxwell’s fundamental electromagnetic equations and the fundamental equations of the opposing electromagnetics. In Heinrich Hertz. Miscellaneous Papers. L., Macmillan and Co, 1896, pp. 273–290.
Hertz, H. [1887]. On very rapid electrical oscillations. In Heinrich Rudolph Hertz. Electrical Waves, L., 1893, pp. 29–53.
Hertz, H. [1888a]. On the finite velocity of propagation of electromagnetic actions. In Heinrich Rudolph Hertz. Electrical Waves, L., 1893, pp. 107–123.
Hertz, H. [1888b]. On electromagnetic waves in air and their reflection. In Heinrich Rudolph Hertz. Electrical waves, L.: Macmillan, 1893, pp. 124–136.
Hertz, H. [1889a]. The forces of electric oscillations, treated according to Maxwell’s theory. In Heinrich Rudolph Hertz. Electric Waves., L.: Macmillan, 1893, pp. 137–159.
Hertz, H. [1890] On the fundamental equations of electromagnetics for bodies at rest. In Heinrich Rudolph Hertz. Electric Waves., L.: Macmillan, 1893, pp. 195–240.
Hertz, H. (1893). Electric waves. L.: Macmillan.
Hertz, H. (1899). The principles of mechanics presented in a new form (translated by D.E. Jones). L.: Macmillan.
Hesse, M. (1973). Logic of discovery in Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory. In R. N. Giere & R. S. Westfall (Eds.), Foundations of scientific method: the nineteenth century (pp. 86–114). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hirosige, T. (1976). The ether problem, the mechanistic world view and the origins of the theory of relativity. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 7, 3–82.
Holton, G. (1968). Mach, Einstein and the search for reality. Daedalus, 97, 636–673.
Hon, G., & Goldstein, B. R. (2012). Maxwell’s contrived analogy: An early version of the methodology of modeling. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43, 236–257.
Howard, D. (1994). Einstein, Kant and the origins of logical positivism. In W. Salmon & G. Wolters (Eds.), Language, logic and the structure of scientific theories : The Carnap–Reichenbach centennial (pp. 45–105). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hunt, B. (2005). The Maxwellians. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kant, I. [1783]. Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science. (Transl. by Gary Hatfield). In Immanuel Kant. Theoretical philosophy after 1781. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Kant, I. [1787]. The critique of pure reason, 2nd ed. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan & Co, 1929. Rpt.: N.Y.: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.
Kostro, L. (1988). An outline of the history of Einstein’s relativistic ether concept. In J. Eisenstaedt & A. J. Kox (Eds.), Studies in the history of general relativity (pp. 260–280). Boston: Birkhauser.
Kuhn, T. (1977). Objectivity, value judgement and theory choice. In The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical papers, volume 1. In J. Worral, & G. Currie (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahon, B. (2003). The man who changed everything. The life of James Clerk Maxwell. London: Wiley.
Maxwell, J. ([1858/1890]1952). On Faraday’s lines of force. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1856, vol. X, part 1. Reprinted. In The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, [1890] 1952, vol. 1, pp. 155–229.
Maxwell, J. ([1861-1862/1890]1952) On physical lines of force. Philosophical magazine, Series 4, 21,161–175,281–291. Philosophical Magazine, Series 4,23,12–24,89–95. Reprinted. In: The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, [1890], 1952, 1, 451–513.
Maxwell, J. ([1865/1890]1952). A dynamical theory of electromagnetic field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 155, 459–512 (read December 8, 1864). Reprinted. In: The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, [1890] 1952, 1, pp. 526–597.
Maxwell, J. ([1868/1890] 1952). Note on the electromagnetic theory of light. Philosophical Transactions, vol. CLVIII. Reprinted in: The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 1890, 2, pp. 137–142.
Maxwell, J. ([1873/1891] 1954). A treatise on electricity and magnetism. 2 vols (3rd ed.). New York: Dover.
Maxwell, J. ([1873/1890] 1952). On action at a distance. Reprinted in: The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 1890, vol. 1, pp. 315–20.
Maxwell, J. ([1877/1890] 1952). Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand Helmholtz. Nature, vol. XV. Reprinted. In The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 1890, vol. 2, pp. 592–59.
Mertz, J. (1964). A history of European thought in the Nineteenth Century, vol. 4. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1903–1912. Vols 1 and 2 reprinted as “A History of European Scientific Thought in the Nineteenth Century. NY: Dover.
Morrison, M. (2000). Unifying scientific theories: Physical concepts and mathematical structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nugayev, R. (1985a). A study of theory unification. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 36, 159–173.
Nugayev, R. (1985b). The history of quantum theory as a decisive argument favoring Einstein over Lorentz. Philosophy of Science, 52, 44–63.
Nugayev, R. M. (1987). Genesis and structure of models in modern relativistic gravitation theories. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2, 84–104.
Nugayev, R. (1999a). Einstein’s revolution : A case study in communicative rationality. Foundations of Science, 4(2), 155–204.
Nugayev, R. (1999b). Reconstruction of mature theory change: A theory—change model. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Nugayev, R. M. (2000). Early quantum theory genesis: Reconciliation of Maxwellian electrodynamics, thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. Annales de la Fondation Louis De Broigle, 25, 337–362.
Nugayev, R. M. (2002). Basic paradigm change. The conception of communicative rationality. Russian Studies in Philosophy (NY), 41(2), 23–36.
Nugayev, R. (2013). The Ptolemy–Copernicus transition: Intertheoretic context. Almagest, 4(1), 96–119.
Olson, R. (1975). Scottish philosophy and British physics, 1750–1880: A study in the foundations of the victorian scientific style. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ono, Y. (1983). Einstein’s speech at Kyoto University, December 14, 1922. NTM -Schriftenreihe fur geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, 20, 25–28.
Palmquist, S. (2011). The Kantian Grounding of Einstein’s Worldview. Polish Journal of Philosophy, 5(1), 97–116.
Patton, L. (2009). Signs, toy models and the a priori: from Helmholtz to Wittgenstein. In Studies in history and philosophy of science, pp. 281–289.
Pickering, A. (1985). Constructing Quarks. A sociological history of particle physics. Chicago: The University of chicago Press.
Sengupta, D., & Sarkar, T. (2003). Maxwell, Hertz, the Maxwellians and the early history of electromagnetic waves. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 45(2), 12–19.
Shapiro, I. (1973). On the history of the discovery of the Maxwell equations. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 15(5), 651–659.
Siegel, D. (1991). Innovation in Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory: Molecular vortices, displacement current, and light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smirnov-Rueda, R. (2001). Were Hertz’s “crucial experiments” on propagation of electromagnetic interaction conclusive? In A. E. Chubykalo, V. Pope, & R. Smirnov-Rueda (Eds.), Instantaneous action at a distance in modern physics: Pro and contra (pp. 57–69). NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Stepin, V. (2005). Theoretical knowledge, volume 326 of synthese library. Berlin: Springer.
Ter Haar, D. (1967). The old quantum theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Whewell, W. (1847). The philosophy of inductive sciences, founded upon their history, in 2 volumes. Second edition. L., John W. Parker and Son.
Whittaker, E. (1910). A history of the theories of aether and electricity : From the age of descartes to the close of the nineteenth century. L. NY: Longmans, Green and Co.
Zahar, E. (1989). Einstein’s revolution : A study in heuristic. La Salle: Open Court.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nugayev, R.M. Communicative Rationality of the Maxwellian Revolution. Found Sci 20, 447–478 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9417-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9417-z