Abstract
This is the second in a sequence of three essays which axiomatize and apply Edmund Husserl's dependence ontology of parts and wholes as a non-Diodorean, non-Kantian temporal semantics for first-order predicate modal languages. The Ontology of Intentionality I introduced enough of Husserl's dependence-ontology of parts and wholes to formulate his account of order as effected by relating moments of unity, and The Ontology of Intentionality II extends that axiomatic dependence-ontology far enough to enable its semantic application. Formalizing the compatibility [Vereinbarkeit] relation implicated in Husserl's notorious doctrine of impossible meanings, the essay introduces a compatibility restriction on relations to formulate Husserl's distinction between singular [einheitliche] and plural [mehrheitliche] objects, using plural relating moments to define first-order versions of Husserl's notions of relation complexes (i.e. Sachverhalte), abstracta of n-ary relation complexes, categorial relations, abstract eide as unifications of categorial relations, semantic domains as completions of abstract eide, and material regions as semantic domains which are compatibility upper bounds of categorial relations. These concepts will enable the formal dependence-ontological noetic semantics for two-valued, first-order modal languages introduced in the sequel Two-Valued Logics of Intentionality, the third essay in the sequence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grathoff, R (Ed.), (1989). Philosophers in exile: The correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Aron Gurwitsch, 1939–1959, Tr. J. Claude Evans. Bloomington Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 75, 527–538.
Gurwitsch, A. (1964). The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Husserl, E. (1928). Logische Untersuchungen, 2. Band 1. Halle: Teil, Max Niemeyer.
Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations (1901) 2nd ed., Tr. J. N. Findlay, Vol. I, II. N.Y.: Humanities Press.
Husserl, E. (1972). In L. Landgrebe (Ed.), Erfahrung und Urteil. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Husserl, E. (1973). In L. Landgrebe, (Ed.), Experience and judgment. Tr. J. Churchill, & K. Ameriks. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Mertz D. (1996). Moderate realism and its logic. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Null, G. T. (1989). Husserl’s doctrine of essence. In J. N. Mohanty, & W. R. McKenna (Eds.), Husserl’s phenomenology: A textbook. Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology & University Press of America.
Russell, B. (1903). Principles of mathematics. N.Y.: W.W. Norton.
Smith, B., & Smith, E. W. (Eds.), (1995). The Cambridge companion to Husserl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, B. (Ed.), (1988). Foundations of Gestalt theory. München: Philosophia Verlag.
Tarski, A. (1956). The concept of truth in formalized languages. In Logic, semantics, metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, Tr. J. H. Woodger. NY: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Null, G.T. The ontology of intentionality II: dependence ontology as prolegomenon to noetic modal semantics. Husserl Stud 23, 119–159 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-006-9015-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-006-9015-6