Skip to main content
Log in

Professional Autonomy in Belgium

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Belgian health care system has a few features that may havecontributed to the rising costs of health care: patients' freechoice of physicians, large clinical freedom of physicians, essentiallya fee-for-service remuneration for medical specialists in which the feesare agreed between insurance funds and physicians. The increased medicalconsumption and costs have prompted the state and insurance companies totake measures that limit the professional autonomy of the physicians.Access to medical education, free until 1997, is now restricted. Themedical profession is organized in the Order of Physicians that hasestablished a code of professional ethics that has moral but not legalforce. So far, there is no special legislation for thepatient–physician relationship, though laws on specific issueslike organ transplantation contain duties for physicians. In recentyears a debate is taking place on patients' rights, of which informedconsent is central and gaining importance in medico-legal publications.An analysis of (ethical and legal) regulations concerning thewithholding or withdrawal of treatment by physicians demonstrate thatthe profession still enjoys a large clinical autonomy, though duediscussion with the patient has become more explicitly required. Therespect for professional autonomy is not primarily due to any formalpower that the Order of Physicians would have, but is rather grounded inthe generally high quality of the patient–physician relationshipthat in ethical terms is considered essentially as a confidencerelationship rather than a contractual relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bande-Knops J, Nys H. Health care policy and services. In: Boudart M, Boudart M, Bryssinck R, eds., Modern Belgium. Palo Alto, California: Society for the Promotion of Science and Scholarship, 1990: 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Court of Cassation, 1974; p. 132.

  3. Court of Cassation, May 19, 1988.

  4. De Cooman E, Marchand M. Rules and incentives for hospitals: The Belgian Financing system. Health Policy 1987; 32: 229–230.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Defever M. The Belgian health care system. In: European Health Services Handbook. London: European Health Care Management Association, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dijon X. Entre le droit et la mort. Propositions pour é viter et ré cuser l'euthanasie'. Journal des Tribunaux 1985: 35.

  7. Dupont L, Fynaut C. International Encyclopaedia of Criminal Law, Belgium. Deventer: Kluwer, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dupont L, Verstraeten R. Handboek Belgisch Strafrecht. Leuven: Acco, 1990; 293.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jost TS. Assuring the Quality of Medical Practice. An International Comparative Study. London: King Edward Hospital Fund for London, Project Paper 1990; 82: 51.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kruithof R. Tendenzen inzake medische aansprakelijkheid (Trends in Medical Liability). Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht 1982–1983: 177.

  11. McCormick RA. Beyond principlism is not enough. In: DuBose ER, ed., A Matter of Principles? Fermint in U.S. Bioethics. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1994: 344–361.

  12. Nys H. International Encyclopaedia of Medical Law, Belgium. Deventer: Kluwer, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prims A, Vansweevelt T, Van Lil M. Ontwikkelingen in het gezondheidsrecht in België [Developments of health law in Belgium]. Tijdschrift voor gezondheidsrecht 1989; 12: 212–217

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schotsmans P. The patient in a persistent vegetative state. An ethical re-appraisal. Bijdragen. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie en Theologie 54; 3: 2–18.

  15. Sokolowski R. The art and science of medicine. In: Pellegrino ED, ed., Catholic Perspectives on Medical Ethics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1968: 269.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nys, H., Schotsmans, P. Professional Autonomy in Belgium. Theor Med Bioeth 21, 425–439 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009921306197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009921306197

Navigation