Abstract
The Belgian health care system has a few features that may havecontributed to the rising costs of health care: patients' freechoice of physicians, large clinical freedom of physicians, essentiallya fee-for-service remuneration for medical specialists in which the feesare agreed between insurance funds and physicians. The increased medicalconsumption and costs have prompted the state and insurance companies totake measures that limit the professional autonomy of the physicians.Access to medical education, free until 1997, is now restricted. Themedical profession is organized in the Order of Physicians that hasestablished a code of professional ethics that has moral but not legalforce. So far, there is no special legislation for thepatient–physician relationship, though laws on specific issueslike organ transplantation contain duties for physicians. In recentyears a debate is taking place on patients' rights, of which informedconsent is central and gaining importance in medico-legal publications.An analysis of (ethical and legal) regulations concerning thewithholding or withdrawal of treatment by physicians demonstrate thatthe profession still enjoys a large clinical autonomy, though duediscussion with the patient has become more explicitly required. Therespect for professional autonomy is not primarily due to any formalpower that the Order of Physicians would have, but is rather grounded inthe generally high quality of the patient–physician relationshipthat in ethical terms is considered essentially as a confidencerelationship rather than a contractual relationship.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bande-Knops J, Nys H. Health care policy and services. In: Boudart M, Boudart M, Bryssinck R, eds., Modern Belgium. Palo Alto, California: Society for the Promotion of Science and Scholarship, 1990: 369–375.
Court of Cassation, 1974; p. 132.
Court of Cassation, May 19, 1988.
De Cooman E, Marchand M. Rules and incentives for hospitals: The Belgian Financing system. Health Policy 1987; 32: 229–230.
Defever M. The Belgian health care system. In: European Health Services Handbook. London: European Health Care Management Association, 1992.
Dijon X. Entre le droit et la mort. Propositions pour é viter et ré cuser l'euthanasie'. Journal des Tribunaux 1985: 35.
Dupont L, Fynaut C. International Encyclopaedia of Criminal Law, Belgium. Deventer: Kluwer, 1992
Dupont L, Verstraeten R. Handboek Belgisch Strafrecht. Leuven: Acco, 1990; 293.
Jost TS. Assuring the Quality of Medical Practice. An International Comparative Study. London: King Edward Hospital Fund for London, Project Paper 1990; 82: 51.
Kruithof R. Tendenzen inzake medische aansprakelijkheid (Trends in Medical Liability). Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht 1982–1983: 177.
McCormick RA. Beyond principlism is not enough. In: DuBose ER, ed., A Matter of Principles? Fermint in U.S. Bioethics. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1994: 344–361.
Nys H. International Encyclopaedia of Medical Law, Belgium. Deventer: Kluwer, 1993.
Prims A, Vansweevelt T, Van Lil M. Ontwikkelingen in het gezondheidsrecht in België [Developments of health law in Belgium]. Tijdschrift voor gezondheidsrecht 1989; 12: 212–217
Schotsmans P. The patient in a persistent vegetative state. An ethical re-appraisal. Bijdragen. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie en Theologie 54; 3: 2–18.
Sokolowski R. The art and science of medicine. In: Pellegrino ED, ed., Catholic Perspectives on Medical Ethics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1968: 269.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nys, H., Schotsmans, P. Professional Autonomy in Belgium. Theor Med Bioeth 21, 425–439 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009921306197
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009921306197