Skip to main content
Log in

Killing and Letting-Die: Bare Differences and Clear Differences

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Fisher, J.M. and Ravizza, M. (eds.) (1992): Ethics: Problems and Principles, New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (1978): ‘The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect’, reprinted in Fisher and Ravizza (1992), pp. 59–68.

  • Kagan, S. (1988): ‘The Additive Fallacy’, reprinted in Fisher and Ravizza (1992), pp. 252–271.

  • Malm, H. (1989): ‘Killing, Letting Die, and Simple Conflicts', in Fisher and Ravizza (1992), pp. 133–145.

  • Malm, H. (1992): ‘In Defense of the Contrast Strategy’, in Fisher and Ravizza (1992), pp. 272–277.

  • Rachels, J. (1975): ‘Active and Passive Euthanasia’, reprinted in Fisher and Ravizza (1992), pp. 112–116.

  • Rachels, J. (1986): The End of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. J. (1976): ‘Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem’, reprinted in Fisher and Ravizza (1992), pp. 69–76.

  • Thomson, J. J. (1985): ‘The Trolley Problem’, reprinted in Fisher and Ravizza (1992), pp. 280–292.

  • Tooley, M. (1980): ‘An Irrelevant Consideration: Killing versus Letting die’, reprinted in Fisher and Ravizza (1992), pp. 106–111.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oddie, G. Killing and Letting-Die: Bare Differences and Clear Differences. Philosophical Studies 88, 267–287 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004238703060

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004238703060

Navigation