Abstract
Relatively little research has examined the effects of ownership on the firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR). In addition, most of it has been conducted in the Western context such as the U.S. and Europe. Using a sample of 118 large Korean firms, we hypothesize that different types of shareholders will have distinct motivations toward the firm’s CSR engagement. We break down ownership into different groups of shareholders: institutional, managerial, and foreign ownerships. Results indicate a significant, positive relationship between CSR ratings and ownership by institutions and foreign investors. In contrast, shareholding by top managers is negatively associated with firm’s CSR rating while outside director ownership is not significant. We conclude that different owners have differential impacts on the firm’s CSR engagement.
Notes
KLD ratings consist of multiple sub-domains: Environment, Community, Diversity, Employee Relations, Human Rights, Product Quality and Safety, and Corporate Governance.
Although the results of two 2SLS regressions are not reported here due to identical findings with our OLS regression models, additional results are available from the authors upon request.
References
Admati, A. R., Pfleiderer, P., & Zechner, J. (1994). Large shareholder activism, risk sharing, and financial market equilibrium. The Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1097–1130.
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525.
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.
Albrecht, C., Turnbull, C., Zhang, Y., & Skousen, C. J. (2010). The relationship between South Korean Chaebols and Fraud. Management Research Review, 33, 257–268.
Baek, J. S., Kang, J. K., & Park, K. S. (2004). Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from the Korean financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 71, 265–313.
Bailey, W., & Jagtiani, J. (1994). Foreign ownership restrictions and stock prices in the Thai capital market. Journal of Financial Economics, 36, 57–87.
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86.
Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 205–214.
Belal, A. R. (2001). A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16, 274–289.
Boehm, A. (2005). The participation of businesses in community decision making. Business & Society, 44, 144–177.
Boyd, B. K. (1994). Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 335–344.
Brancato, C. K. (1997). Institutional investors and corporate governance: beat practices for increasing corporate value. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill.
Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith, C. W. Jr. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 267–291.
Bushee, B. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73, 305–333.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946–967.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.
Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 479–491.
Chang, S. J. (2003). Ownership structure, expropriation and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 238–253.
Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transaction. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 429–448.
Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A seven country study of CSR website reporting. Business and Society, 44, 415–441.
Chen, G. M., Lee, B. S., & Rui, O. (2001). Foreign ownership restrictions and market segmentation in China’s stock markets. Journal of Financial Research, 24, 133–156.
Cho, D. S., & Kim, J. T. (2007). Outside directors, ownership structures and firm profitability in Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 239–250.
Choi, S., & Aguilera, R. V. (2009). CSR dynamics in South Korea and Japan: A comparative analysis. In C. A. Mallin (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility: A case study approach (pp. 123–147). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Choi, J. J., Park, S. W., & Yoo, S. S. (2007). The value of outside directors: Evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42, 941–962.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. P. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81–112.
Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 42–56.
Davis, G. F., & Kim, E. H. (2007). Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds. Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 552–570.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.
Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations and their implications for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 185–193.
Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901–924.
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. The Journal of Finance, 52, 135–160.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 1, 57–74.
Eisenmann, T. R. (2002). The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 513–534.
Falck, O., & Heblich, S. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons, 50, 247–254.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25, 383–417.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.
Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 505–538.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.
Fortune, (1993). What activist investors want. March, 8, 59–63.
Gedajlovic, E. R., & Shapiro, D. M. (1998). Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 533–553.
Gehrig, T. (1993). An information based explanation of the domestic bias in international equity investment. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95, 97–109.
Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–1046.
Greenaway, D., Guariglia, A., & Yu, Z. (2009). The more the better? Foreign ownership and corporate performance in China. Working Paper.
Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9, 77–108.
Haggard, S., Lim, W. H., & Kim, E. S. (2003). Economic crisis and corporate restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2004). CEOs who have COOs: Contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 959–979.
Hambrick, D. C., & Jackson, E. M. (2000). Outside directors with a stake: The Linchpin in improving governance. California Management Review, 42, 108–127.
Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1119–1158.
Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 941–952.
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 697–716.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Jeon, J. Q., Lee, C., & Moffett, C. M. (2011). Effects of foreign ownership on payout policy: Evidence from Korean market. Journal of Financial Market, 14, 344–375.
Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.
Jones, M. T. (1999). The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 163–179.
Kim, Y. (2005). Board network characteristics and firm performance in Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 800–808.
Kim, Y. (2007). The proportion and social capital of outside directors and their impacts on firm value: Evidence from Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 1168–1176.
Kochhar, R., & David, P. (1996). Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 73–84.
Kronborg, D., & Thomsen, S. (2009). Foreign ownership and long term survival. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 207–219.
Lee, M. D. P., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Domesticating radical rant and rage: An exploration of the consequences of environmental shareholder resolutions on corporate environmental performance. Business & Society, 50, 155–188.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.
McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595–612.
McWilliam, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.
Moon, I. (2006, May 3). Korea’s Chaebol syndrome persists. Business Week.
Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 299–315.
Narayanan, M. P. (1985). Managerial incentives for short-term results. Journal of Finance, 40, 1469–1484.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.
Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. (1997). European patterns of corporate ownership: A twelve-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 759–778.
Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28, 275–296.
Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 349–364.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependent perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Pound, J. (1992). Beyond takeovers: Politics comes to corporate control. Harvard Business Review, 70, 83–93.
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting Organizations and Society, 17, 595–612.
Sanders, W. G., & Boivie, S. (2004). Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 167–186.
Schnatterly, K., Shaw, K. W., & Jennings, W. W. (2008). Information advantages of large institutional owners. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 219–227.
Sethi, S. P. (2005). Investing in socially responsible companies is a must for public pension funds—Because there is no better alternative. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 99–129.
Shamsie, J. (2003). The context of dominance: An industry-driven framework for exploiting reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 199–215.
Shleifer, A. (2000). Inefficient markets: An introduction to behavioral finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.
Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16, 773–792.
Smith, M. P. (1996). Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. The Journal of Finance, 51, 227–252.
Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195–204.
Teoh, H. Y., & Shiu, G. Y. (1990). Attitudes towards corporate social responsibility and perceived importance of social responsibility information characteristics in a decision context. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 71–77.
Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance—financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.
Welford, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America, and Asia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, 33–52.
Yoshikawa, T., Rasheed, A. A., & Del Brio, E. B. (2010). The impact of firm strategy and foreign ownership on executive bonus compensation in Japanese firms. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1254–1260.
Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1713–1735.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, W.Y., Chang, Y.K. & Martynov, A. The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea. J Bus Ethics 104, 283–297 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0912-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0912-z