Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pharmaceutical sector, an industry already facing stiff challenges in the form of intensified competition and strategic consolidation, has increasingly become subject to a range of pressures. Crucially, in common with other large-scale businesses, pharmaceutical firms find themselves ‹invited’ to respond positively to the corporate ‹social’ responsibility (CSR) expectations of their stakeholders. Consequently, individual managers will almost certainly be obliged to engage in some form of stakeholder dialogue and this, in turn, means that they will have to make difficult choices about which practices to adopt. This real-world management predicament runs parallel to an academic interest in CSR stakeholder dialogue theory and models. Accordingly, the approach of this paper is to focus primarily on the academic debate surrounding stakeholder dialogue, by reviewing past attempts to research and theorise the subject, by identifying gaps and weaknesses in the literature, and by proposing a new analytical model. The central aim of the proposed new model is to offer a unified, structured, systematic, and comprehensive approach to CSR decision making whilst simultaneously providing a practical framework for CSR executives who face the challenge of responding in an effective manner to stakeholders. The model outlined here is currently being employed to conduct international comparative empirical research into stakeholder dialogue practices amongst UK and German pharmaceutical firms. In the longer term the intention is to use the model to undertake international comparative research encompassing a broader range of countries and industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acutt J. N., Medina-Ross V., O’Riordan T.: 2004, Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Chemical Sector: A Comparative Analysis of the Mexican and South African cases, Natural Resources Forum, 28, 302–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M.: 2004, ‹Emerging Issues in CSR – Drugs for AIDS in Africa’, www.mallenbaker.net/csr/CSRfiles/aids.html, accessed 5th October 2004

  • Blum-Kusterer M., Hussain S. S.: 2001, Innovation and Corporate Sustainability: An Investigation into the Process of Change in the Pharmaceuticals Industry, Business Strategy and the Environment. 10(5), 300–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowmann-Larsen L., Wiggen O.: 2004, Responsibility in World Business: Managing Harmful Side-Effects of Corporate Activity, USA: United Nations University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S., Pavelin S.: 2004, Building a Good Reputation, European Management Journal, 22(6), 704–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke L., Logsdon J. M.: 1996, How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off, Long Range Planning 29(4), 495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business and Human Rights: 2003, ‹Business and Human Rights Dilemmas and Solutions’, in R. Sullivan (ed.), Insight Investment UK, with a Forward by Mary Robinson (www.duurzaam-ondernemen.nl, accessed 8th March 2005)

  • Carroll A. B.: 1999, Corporate Social Responsibility: The Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business and Society 38(3), 268–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A., G. Beiler: 1978, Landmarks in the Evolution of the Social Audit in A. Carroll (ed.), Managing Corporate Social Responsibility (Boston, Little, Brown and Co.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castka P. et al: 2004, How Can SMEs Effectively Implement the CSR Agenda? A UK Case Study Perspective, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11, 140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challen P.: 1974, Corporate Planning for Social Responsibility, Long Range Planning, 38, 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark C.: 2000, Differences Between Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Analysis, Public Relations Review 26(3), 363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane A., Matten D.: 2004, Business Ethics: A European Perspective. (NY, USA: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R. et al: 2004, Accountability for Injustice, Human Resource Management Review, 14, 107–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSR Risk Mapping Initiative: 2004, ‹Human Rights and Business Risk in the Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sectors’, www.iblf.org/csr/csrwebassist.nsf/webprintview/blf2d3.html, accessed 7th October 2004

  • Daniels J., Radebaugh L.: 2001, International Business: Environments and Operations, (New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deresky H. (2000) International Management: Managing Across Boarders and Cultures. (New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein M, Roy M.: 2001, Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers, Long Range Planning 34, 585–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esrock S. L., Leichty G. B.: 1998, Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-Presentation or Agenda-Setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrass, J.: 2006, ‹UK Businesses and CSR Policy: Shaping the Debate in the EU’, Working Paper 06/31, School of Management, University of Bradford. October 2006

  • Fairbrass, J.: 2008, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: The EU and National Policy Models Compared’, Working Paper 08/03, School of Management, University of Bradford, February 2008

  • Fairbrass, J., L. O’Riordan and H. Mirza: 2006, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility: Differing Definitions and Practices?’, Working Paper 06/05, School of Management, University of Bradford, February 2006

  • Freeman R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach, (Massachusetts: Pitman Publishing Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Get Ethical-Ethical Matters: 2004, ‹Hot Topics – GlaxoSmithKline’, www.ethicalmatters.co.uk/articles.asp?itemID=181, accessed 15th October 2004

  • Gladwell M.: 2005, The Tipping Point: How Little Thinks Can Make a Big Difference (London: Abacus)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield W. M.: 2004, In the Name of Corporate Social Responsibility, Business Horizons 47(1), 19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch A., Jonker J.: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility (Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag)

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C.: 2003, ‹What’s Business for’, in Harvard Business Review on Corporate Responsibility (harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, USA)

  • Haugh R.: 2003, Getting the Attention of Big Pharma, Hospitals & Health Networks, 77(10), 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoertz Badaracco C.: 1998, The Transparent Corporation and Organized Community Public Relations Review, 24(3), 265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G.: 1997, Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind – Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival (New York, USA: McGraw-Hill)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfel I. 2001, Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index: A Global Benchmark for Corporate Sustainability, Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8(1), 6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P., Lee N.: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause (New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I., Ferrell O.: 2003, Nature of Corporate Responsibilities: Perspectives from American, French, and German Consumers, Journal of Business Research, 56, 55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I., et al: 2002, Managing Socially Responsible Buying: How to Integrate Non-Economic Criteria into the Purchasing Process, European Management Journal 20(6), 641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray K. B., Vogel C. M.: 1997, Using a Hierarchy-of Effects Approach to Gauge the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility to Generate Goodwill Toward the Firm: Financial Versus Non Financial Impacts, Journal of Business Research 38, 141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsaic: 2001, ‹Worldwide Incidence and Prevalence Rates’, www.newsaic.com/mwaids.html, accessed 15th October 2004

  • O’Higgins E.: 2005, Ireland: Bridging the Atlantic in A. Habisch, J. Jonker (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility, (Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, L.: 2006, CSR and Stakeholder Dialogue: Theory, Concepts, and Models for the Pharmaceutical Industry (MRes Dissertation, University of Bradford, Bradford)

  • O’Riordan, L. and J. Fairbrass: 2006, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue’, Working Paper 06/45, School of Management, University of Bradford, November 2006

  • Oxfam/VSO/Save the Children: 2002, Beyond Philanthropy: The Pharmaceutical Industry, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Developing World (London)

  • Porter M. E.: 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. (New York, USA: Free Press Edition)

    Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers: 2006, ‹Corporate Responsibility in the Pharmaceutical Industry’, www.pwc.com/servlet/PWCPrintPteview, accessed 19th May 2004

  • Quist-Arcton, O.: 2001, ‹Drugs Giants Drop Case Against South Africa’, AllAfrica.com, Johannesburg, http://allafrica.comstories/printable/200104190053.html

  • Ruggie, J.: 2003, ‹The New World of Corporate Social Responsibility’, www.ksg.harvard.edu/cbg/CSRI/publications/ruggie_new_world_of_csr.pdf

  • Saravanamuthu K.: 2001, What is Measured Counts: Harmonized Corporate Reporting and Sustainable Economic Development, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15, 295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigson, B.: 2002, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Business Paradigm’, www.isuma.net/v03n02/stigson_e.shtml

  • Sturdivant F.: 1977, Business and Society, (Homewood: R.D. Irwin Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh H., Thong G.: 1984, Another Look at Corporate Social Responsibility and Reporting: An Empirical Study in a Developing Country Accounting Organisations and Society, 9(2), 189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Third World Network: 2004, ‹Third World Network: Aids Activists March Against Pharmaceutical Companies’, www.twnside.org.sg/title/against.htm, accessed 15th October 2004

  • Trompenaars F., Hampden-Turner C.: 2004, Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business, 3rd Edition (London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Veleva V., et al: 2003, Indicators for Measuring Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study of the Pharmaceutical Industry, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(2), 107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD: 2002, The Business Case for Sustainable Development: Making a Difference Towards the Johannesburg Summit 2002 and Beyond (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Weiss J. W.: 1998, Business Ethics: A stakeholder and Issues Management Approach, Forth Worth, USA: Dryden Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R.: 2004, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and Asia: Critical Elements and Best Practice’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 13, 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R.: 2005, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17, 33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward D. et al: 2001, “Some Evidence on Executives”. Views of Corporate Social Responsibility, British Accounting Review 33, 357–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Fairbrass.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Riordan, L., Fairbrass, J. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue. J Bus Ethics 83, 745–758 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9662-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9662-y

Keywords

Navigation