Skip to main content
Log in

A Quinean Definition Of Synonymy

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to propose and defend anew definition of synonymy. Roughly (and slightly misleadingly), theidea is that two expressions are synonymous iff intersubstitutions insentences preserve the degree of doxastic revisability. In Section 1 Iargue that Quine's attacks on analyticity leave room for such adefinition. The definition is presented in Section 2, and Section 3elaborates on the concept of revisability. The definition is defendedin Sections 4 and 5. It is, inter alia, shown that the definition hasdesired formal properties. In Sections 6 and 7 I briefly comment on,first, the relation of the definition to Quine's later ideas about (stimulus)synonymy, and, second, its relation to a general, interlinguistic, conceptof meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Boghossian, P. A.: 1997, ‘Analyticity’, in B. Hale and C. Wright (eds), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1978, ‘Belief andSynonymy’, Journal of Philosophy 75, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1992, ‘Philosophy of Language and Mind1950–1990’, The Philosophical Review 101, 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1956, Meaning and Necessity, 2ndedn, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1998, Concepts. Where Cognitive ScienceWentWrong, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O.:1999, ‘A Survey of Non-Prioritized Belief Revision’, Erkenntnis 50, 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1962, ‘The Analytic and the Synthetic’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Reprinted in Putnam, Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, volume 2, Cambridge University Press, 1975. Page references to the reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.:1951, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, The Philosophical Review. Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, 3rd edn, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1980. Page references to the reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.:1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1960a, ‘Carnap and LogicalTruth’, Synthese 12, 1960. Reprinted in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, revised edn, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1976. Page references to the reprint.

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1992, Pursuit of Truth, 2nd edn,Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.O.: 1995, From Stimulus to Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagin, P. A Quinean Definition Of Synonymy. Erkenntnis 55, 7–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011975813755

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011975813755

Keywords

Navigation