Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ISPs & Rowdy Web Sites Before the Law: Should We Change Today’s Safe Harbour Clauses?

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Philosophy & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper examines today’s debate on the new responsibilities of Internet service providers (ISPs) in connection with legal problems concerning jurisdiction, data processing, people’s privacy and education. The focus is foremost on the default rules and safe harbour clauses for ISPs liability, set up by the US and European legal systems. This framework is deepened in light of the different functions of the services provided on the Internet so as to highlight multiple levels of control over information and, correspondingly, different types of liability. The new responsibilities of ISPs concern the original “end-to-end” architecture of the medium and policies on design rather than responsibility for user content and individual messages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. (2010). The Web is dead: Who’s to blame—Us. Wired, September, pp. 123–127, 164.

  • Bauböck, R. (1994). Transnational citizenship: Membership and rights in international migration. London: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the web. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuker, J., Casanovas, P., Klein, M., & Francesconi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Law, ontologies and the semantic web. Amsterdam: Ios Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Sartor, G., & Ajani, G. (Eds.). (2010). AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems. Complex systems, the semantic web, ontologies, argumentation, and dialogue. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavoukian, A. (2010). Privacy by design: The definitive workshop. Identity in the Information Society, 3(2), 247–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerf, V. (2007). User-generated content is top threat to media and entertainment industry. Accenture, April 16.

  • Cohen-Almagor, R. (2010). Responsibility of and trust in ISPs. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 23(3–4), 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSISAC (2009). Comments to OECD on information intermediaries. The Civil Society Information Society Advisory Council, June 30th, 2009. Retrieved 3rd November 2010 from http://csisac.org/docs/OECD_Intermediary_071409_final.pdf.

  • Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., & Nissenbaum, M. (2008). Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In J. van den Hoven & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy (pp. 322–353). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2003). On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2006). Information technology and the tragedy of the good will. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4), 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glorioso, A., Pagallo, U., & Ruffo, G. (2010). The social impact of P2P systems. In X. Shen, H. Yu, J. Buford, & M. Akon (Eds.), Handbook of peer-to-peer networking (pp. 47–70). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, F. S., & Tavani, H. T. (2005). P2P networks and the Verizon v. RIAA case: Implications for personal privacy and intellectual property. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K. A., & Wolf, M. J. (2008). The ethics of designing artificial agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan (1982 edition). New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hustinx, P. (2007), Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the follow-up of the Work Programme for better implementation of the Data Protection Directive. Official Journal of the European Union, 2007/C 2551/01, July 25th 2007.

  • Jobs, S. (2007). Thoughts on music. Retrieved 20th April 2009 from http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/.

  • Jutla, D. N. (2010). Layering privacy on operating systems, social networks, and other platforms by design. Identity in the Information Society, 3(2), 319–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1795). Kant’s principles of politics, including his essay on perpetual peace. A contribution to political science (translated by W. Hastie). Edinburgh, Clark, 1891.

  • Kuner, Ch. (2003). European data privacy law and online business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: The nature and future of creativity. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockton, D., Harrison, D. J., & Stanton, N. A. (2010). The design with intent method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour. Applied Ergonomics, 41(3), 382–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (2007). The design of future things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagallo, U. (2008). La tutela della privacy negli USA e in Europa. Modelli Giuridici a Confronto. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagallo, U. (2009). Privacy e design. Informatica e Diritto, 1, 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagallo, U. (2010). As law goes by: Topology, ontology, evolution. In P. Casanovas et al. (Eds.), AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems (pp. 12–26). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagallo, U., & Durante, M. (2009). Three roads to P2P systems and their impact on business practices and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, D. G. (2009). In search of Jefferson’s moose: Notes on the state of cyberspace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartor, G. and Viola de Azevedo Cunha, M. (2010). The Italian Google-case: Privacy, freedom of speech and responsibility of providers for user-generated contents. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, forthcoming. Retrieved 19th November 2010 at SSRN from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604411.

  • Tavani, H. T. (2007). Philosophical theories of privacy: Implications for an adequate online privacy policy. Metaphilosophy, 38(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkman, R. (2003). Privacy as life, liberty, property. Ethics and Information Technology, 5(4), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Ahn, L., Maurer, B., McMillen, C., Abraham, D., & Blum, M. (2008). reCAPTCHA: Human-based character recognition via web security measures. Science, 321(5895), 1465–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. (2010). Dignity and defamation: The visibility of hate. Harvard Law Review, 123(7), 1596–1657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, M. (2010). The web is dead: Who’s to blame—Them. Wired, September, pp. 123–127, 166.

  • WP 29 (2009a). EU Working Party art. 29 D-95/46/EC. Online social networking, 01189/09/EN–WP 163, June 12th, 2009.

  • WP 29 (2009b). EU Working Party art. 29 D-95/46/EC. The future of privacy. 02356/09/EN–WP 168, December 1st 2009.

  • WP 29 (2010). EU Working Party art. 29 D-95/46/EC. The concepts of “controller” and “processor.” 02264/10/EN–WP 169, February 16th 2010.

  • Yeung, K. (2007). Towards an understanding of regulation by design. In R. Brownsword & K. Yeung (Eds.), Regulating technologies: Legal futures, regulatory frames and technological fixes (pp. 79–108). London: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittrain, J. (2007). Perfect enforcement on tomorrow’s Internet. In R. Brownsword & K. Yeung (Eds.), Regulating technologies: Legal futures, regulatory frames and technological fixes (pp. 125–156). London: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittrain, J. (2008). The future of the Internet and how to stop it. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Law School, University of Torino, via s. Ottavio 54, 10124, Turin, Italy

    Ugo Pagallo

Authors
  1. Ugo Pagallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugo Pagallo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagallo, U. ISPs & Rowdy Web Sites Before the Law: Should We Change Today’s Safe Harbour Clauses?. Philos. Technol. 24, 419–436 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0031-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0031-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation