Skip to main content
Log in

Predicate logic with flexibly binding operators and natural language semantics

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new formalism for predicate logic is introduced, with a non-standard method of binding variables, which allows a compositional formalization of certain anaphoric constructions, including ‘donkey sentences’ and cross-sentential anaphora. A proof system in natural deduction format is provided, and the formalism is compared with other accounts of this type of anaphora, in particular Dynamic Predicate Logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • van Benthem, J., 1991, “Logic and the flow of information”, to appear in D. Prawitzet al., Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam. [Preprint as CSLI Report No. 91-160, Stanford University.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M., 1991, “Dynamic predicate logic”,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I., 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Massachusetts.

  • Hopcroft, J. and Ullman, J., 1979,Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Addison Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., 1981, “A theory of truth and semantic representation”, in J. Groenendijket al. (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Math. Centre, Amsterdam, 277–322. [Reprinted in J. Groenendijket al. (eds.), 1984,Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht, 1–41.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1975, “Adverbs of quantification”, in E. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, W., and Partee, B., 1984, “How non-context free is variable binding?”, in M. Cobleret al. (eds.),Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Vol. 3, 179–190.

  • Montague, R., 1974,Formal Philosophy, ed. R. M. Thomason, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D., 1965,Natural Deduction, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J., 1984,Conceptual Structures. Information Processing in Man and Machine, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeevat, H., 1989, “A compositional approach to discourse representation theory”,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 95–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman, J., 1967, “A system of implicit quantification”,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 32, 480–504.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Both authors have been supported by grants from the Swedish Council for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagin, P., Westerståhl, D. Predicate logic with flexibly binding operators and natural language semantics. J Logic Lang Inf 2, 89–128 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01050634

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01050634

Key words

Navigation