Abstract
Rawls's recent modification of his theory of justice claims that political liberalism is free-standing and “falls under the category of the political. It works entirely within that domain and does not rely on anything outside it” In this article I pursue the metatheoretical goal of obtaining insight into the anthropological assumptions that have remained so far unacknowledged by Rawls and critics alike. My argument is that political liberalism has a dependence on comprehensive liberalism and its conception of a self-serving subjectivity that is far more binding as well as undesirable than it has been so far acknowledged. I proceed with a heuristic approach that introduces us to the possibility that political liberalism presupposes tacitly the Occidental metanarrative of reason harnessing rampant self-interest and subordinating it to a higher-order interest. As the presuppositions of political liberalism emerge, I draw from the debate between Rawls and Habermas in order to illustrate my argument for the existence of a dependence on these presuppositions. I outline some implications of the anthropological basis of political liberalism and conclude by exemplifying them with reference to Rawls's comments on the division of a cake.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baynes, K. (1990). The Liberal/Communitarian Controversy and Communicative Ethics. In David Rasmussen (Ed.), Universalism vs Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Beggs, D. (1999). Rawls's political postmodernism. Continental Philosophy Review 32: 123–141.
Benhabib, S. (1986). Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Benhabib, S. and Dallmayr, F. (Eds.) (1990). The Communicative Ethics Controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, J. (1990). Discourseethics and civil society. In D. Rasmussen (Ed.), Universalism vs Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Curtis, D.A. (Ed.) (1997). The Castoriadis Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Doppelt, G. (1988). Rawls's Kantian ideal and the viability of modern liberalism. Inquiry 31: 413–449.
Dryzek, J. S. (1995). Critical theory as a research program. In S. K. White (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1981). Reason in the Age of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and Human Interests. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1990). Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning stage “6.” In T.E. Wren (Ed.), The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1992). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason: remarks on John Rawls's political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy 92: 109–131.
Honneth, A. (1995). The limits of liberalism: On the political-ethical discussion concerning communitarianism. In C. W. Wright (Ed.), Axel Honneth: The Fragmented World of the Social. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kant, I. (1978). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Kant, I. (1992). Kant: Political Writings. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kariel, H. (1989). The Desperate Politics of Postmodernism. Amherst and London: University of Massachusets Press.
Kukathas, C. and Petit, P. (1990). Rawls: A Theory of Justice and its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mouffe, C. (1990). Rawls: Political philosophy without politics. In D. Rasmussen (Ed.), Universalism vs Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Papastephanou, M. (2001). Modernization, rationalization and education. Sociological Research Online 6(3), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/.
Papastephanou, M. (2002). Kant's Cosmopolitanism and human history. History of the Human Sciences 15(1): 17–38.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian constructivism in moral theory: The Dewey lectures 1980. The Journal of Philosophy 77: 515–572.
Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14: 223–251.
Rawls, J. (1988a). The priority of right and ideas of the good. Philosophy and Public Affairs 17: 251–276.
Rawls, J. (1988b). L' Idee d'un Consensus par Recoupement. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale 93: 3–32.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1995). Reply to Habermas. The Journal of Philosophy 92: 132–180.
Rawls, J. (1999). John Rawls: Collected Papers. In S. Freeman (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2000). The Just. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sandel, S. (1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayers, S. (1998). Marxism and Human Nature. London and New York: Routledge.
Williams, H. (1999). Kant, Rawls, Habermas and the metaphysics of justice. Kantian Review 3: 1–17.
Young, I. (1986). Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. Praxis International 5: 381–401.
Young, I. (1997). Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papastephanou, M. The Implicit Assumptions of Dividing a Cake: Political or Comprehensive?. Human Studies 27, 307–334 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000042128.34634.b6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000042128.34634.b6