Abstract
Thus far, the moral debateconcerning genetically modified foods (GMF) hasfocused on extrinsic consequentialist questionsabout the health effects, environmental impacts,and economic benefits of such foods. Thisextrinsic approach to the morality of GMF isdependent on unsubstantiated empirical claimsand fails to account for the intrinsic moralvalue of food and food choice and theirconnection to the agent's concept of the goodlife. I develop a set of objections to GMFgrounded in the concept of integrity andmaintain that food and food choice can beintimately connected to the agent's personalintegrity. I argue that due to the constitutionof GMF and the manner in which they areproduced, such foods are incompatible with thefundamental values and integrity of certainindividual moral agents or groups. I identifythree types of integrity that are threatened byGMF: religious, consumer, and integrity basedon certain other moral or metaphysical grounds.I maintain that these types of integrity aresufficiently important to provide justificationfor political and societal actions to protectthe interests of those affected. I conclude byproposing specific steps for handling GMFconsistent with the moral principles ofinformed consent, non-maleficence, and respectfor the integrity of all members of society.They include mandatory labeling of GMF, theimplementation of a system for control andregulations concerning such foods, andguaranteed provision of conventional foods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Batalion, N., “50 Harmful Effects of Genetically Modified Foods,” http://www.cqs.com/ 50harm.htm (2000) (accessed on 26 June, 2003).
Becker, E., “U.S. Threatens to Act Against Europeans Over Modified Foods,” New York Times, January 10, 2003, p. 4.
Benthon, N., “Rat Gene Increases Vitamin C in Plants,” Science From Virginia Tech (2003), http://www.research.vt.edu/resmag/sciencecol/2002vitamin_C.html.
Bovenkerk, B., F. W. A. Brom, and B. J. van den Bergh, “Brave New Birds: The Use of ‘Animal Integrity’ in Animal Ethics,” Hastings Center Report 32(1) (2002), 16–22.
Burkhart, J., Taking Ethics Seriously (unpublished manuscript, University of Florida).
Brown, K., “Seeds of Concern,” Scientific American (April 2001), 51–57.
Comstock, G., “Ethics and Genetically Modified Foods,” SCOPE GM Food Controversy Forum 2 (2001).
Cox, D., M. La Caze, and M. Levine, “Integrity,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2001), http://plato.stanford.edu/archiv es/sum2001/entries/ integrity/ (accessed on 26 June, 2003).
Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/ 164.htm (2001).
Dickman, M. B., Y. K. Park, T. Oltersdorf, W. Li, T. Clemente, and R. French, –Abrogationof Disease Development in Plants Expressing Animal Antiapoptotic Genes,—MEDLINE (2001), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11381106&dopt=Abstract&holding=f1000 (accessed on 26 June,2003).
Hart, K., Eating in the Dark (Pantheon Books, New York, 2002).
Homiak, M., “Moral Character,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2003), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2003/entries/moral-character/(accessed on 26 June, 2003).
Hopkins, K., “The Risks on the Table,” Scientific American (April 2001), 61.
Horsch, R., “Interview with Sasha Nemecek, ‘Does the World Need GMF? Yes!’,” Scientific American (April 2001), 62–63.
McFall, L., “Integrity,” Ethics 98 (1987), 5–20.
Mellon, M., “Interview with Sasha Nemecek, ‘Does the World Need GM Foods?’,” Scientific American (April 2001), 64–65.
Thomson, P., “Food Biotechnology Challenge to Cultural Integrity and Individual Consent,” Hastings Center Report 27(4) (1997), 35–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pascalev, A. You Are What You Eat: Genetically Modified Foods, Integrity, and Society. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16, 583–594 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000004962.00050.17
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000004962.00050.17