Skip to main content
Log in

Epistemology, Research Methodology and Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence Versus Eva®

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article questions the continued use and application of EVA® (economic value added) because it is epistemologically a non-sequitur, fails to satisfy the requirements of sound research methodology in terms of being a reliable and valid metric, and is unlikely to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. In the light of these insufficiencies, the continued use of EVA® is ethically questionable, and moreover in time is likely to result in class actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arditti, F. D.: 1967, 'Risk and the Required Return on Equity', Journal of Finance 22, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, R. D.: 1983, 'What Hath APT Wrought: Which Risks Reap Rewards', Journal of Portfolio Management 9, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banz, R. W.: 1981, 'The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks', Journal of Financial Economics 9, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S.: 1977, 'Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis', Journal of Finance 32, 663–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S.: 1983, 'The Relationship Between Market Yield, Market Value, and Return for NYSE Common Stocks: Further Evidence', Journal of Financial Economics 12, 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhardaj, R. K. and L. D. Brooks: 1992, 'The January Anomaly: Effects of Low Share Price, Transaction Costs, and Bid-Ask Bias', Journal of Finance 47, 553–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, G. C., R. M. Bowen and J. S. Wallace: 1997, 'Does EVA Beat Earnings? Evidence on Associations with Stock Returns and Firm Values', Journal of Accounting and Economics (December), 301–336.

  • Black, F., M. Jensen and M. Scholes: 1972, 'The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests', in M. Jensen (ed.), Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets (Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, M. and I. Friend: 1975, 'The Asset Structure of Individual Portfolios and Some Implications for utility Functions', Journal of Finance 30, 585–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavana, R. Y., B. L. Delahaye and U. Sekaran: 2000, Applied Business Research (John Wiley, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. K. C., Y. Hamao and J. Lakonishok: 1991, 'Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan', Journal of Finance 46, 1739–1789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. K. C., N. Megadeath and J. Lakonishok: 1996, 'Momentum Strategies', Journal of Finance 51, 1681–1713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. and J. L. Dodd. 1997, 'Economic Value Added (EVA): An Empirical Examination of a New Corporate Performance Measure', Journal of Managerial Issues 9, 318–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. and J. L. Dodd: 2001, 'Operating Income, Residual Income, and EVATM: Which Metric is More Value Relevant?', Journal of Managerial Issues 13, 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, P., M. Roenfeldt and N. K. Modani: 1977, 'Interdependence of Market Risk Measures', Journal of Business 50, 356–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. R., and C. W. Emory: 1995, Business Research Methods, 5 ed. (Irwin, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro, J. C. and D. D. Kent: 2001, 'Do EVATM Adopters Outperform their Industry Peers? Evidence from Security Analyst Earnings Forecasts', American Business Review 19, 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D. M., J. M. Poterba and L. H. Summers: 1989, 'What Moves Stock Prices?', Journal of Portfolio Management 15, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.: 1996, Business Research for Decision Making, 4 ed. (Duxbury, Belmont).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, G.: 1969, 'Risk in the Equity Markets: An Empirical Appraisal of Market Efficiency', Yale Economic Essays 9, 3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, D.: 1952, 'Cost of Debt and Equity Funds for Business: Trends and Problems of Measurement', Conference on Research in Business Finance (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F.: 1981, 'Stock Returns, Real Activity, Inflation, and Money', American Economic Review 71, 545–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth: 1973, 'Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests', Journal of Political Economy 81, 607–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth: 1974, 'Tests of the Two Parameter Model', Journal of Financial Economics 1, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth: 1992, 'The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns', Journal of Finance 47, 427–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth: 1993, 'Common Stock Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds', Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth: 1996, 'The CAPM is Wanted Dead or Alive', Journal of Finance 51, 1947–1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth: 2001, 'Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay', Journal of Financial Economics 60, 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission: 1938, 'The Problem of Rate of Return', in Public Utility Regulation, with Special Reference to the Long Lines Department of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, P. and L. Reinoso: 2002, Shareholder Value Creators and Shareholder Value Destroyers in U.S.A.: Year 2001, Working Paper Series (IESE Business School, CIIF, International Center for Financial Research, Spain).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, I. and M. Blume: 1970, 'Measurement of Portfolio Performance under Uncertainty', American Economic Review 60, 561–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauri, P., K. Gronhaug and I. Kristianslund: 1995, Research Methods in Business Studies (Prentice Hall, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. and J. Peavy: 1985, 'The Risk Universal Nature of the P/E Effect', Journal of Portfolio Management 11, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R.: 1999, 'Herding Among Investment Newsletters: Theory and Evidence', Journal of Finance 59, 237–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M., S. Titman and R. Wermers: 1995, Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding: A Study of Mutual Fund Behaviour', American Economic Review 85, 1088–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, R.G. Jnr.: 1995, The Warren Buffet Way (John Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D.: 1987, Modern Portfolio Theory, The Capital Asset Pricing Model & Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A User's Guide, 2 ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, R. A., E. Talmor and W. N. Torous: 1991, 'The Effect of Volatility Changes on the Level of Stock Prices and Subsequent Expected Returns', Journal of Finance 46, 985–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen. R. A. and P. Jorion: 1996, 'The January Effect: Still There After All These Years', Financial Analysts Journal 52, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. and J. C. Stein: 1999, 'A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading, and Overreaction in Asset Markets', Journal of Finance 54, 2143–2184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., T. Lim and J. C. Stein: 2000, 'Bad News Travels Slowly: Size, Analyst Coverage, and the Profitability of Momentum Strategies', Journal of Finance 55, 265–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, G. and S. Kandel: 1990, 'Market Efficiency and Value Line's Record', Journal of Business 63, 187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. P., R. J. Rendelman and H. A. Latane: 1984, 'Stock Returns and SUEs During the 1970s', Journal of Portfolio Management 10, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, O. and C. P. Jones: 1979, 'Earnings Reports and Market Efficiencies: An Analysis of Contrary Evidence', Journal of Financial Research 2, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D. B.: 1983, 'Size-Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality', Journal of Financial Economics 12, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D. B.: 1986, 'Dividend Yields and the January Effect', Journal of Portfolio Management 12, 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, A. and H. Litzenberger. 1976, 'Skewness Preference and the Valuation of Risk Assets', Journal of Finance 31, 1085–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J. R.: 2000, 'The New Math', Barron's (November 20), 31–36.

  • Lakonishok, J. A. and A. C. Shapiro: 1984, 'Stock Returns, Beta, Variance and Size: An Empirical Analysis', Financial Analysts Journal 40, 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny: 1994, 'Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk', Journal of Finance 49, 1541–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, H. A., D. L. Tuttle and C. P. Jones: 1969, 'E/P Ratios vs. Changes in Earnings in Forecasting Future Price Changes', Financial Analysts Journal 25, 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. M. C. and B. Swaminathan: 2000, 'Price Momentum and Trading Volume', Journal of Finance 55, 2017–2069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepkowski, W.: 1998, 'Patents as Corporate Assets', Chemical and Engineering News 76, 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B.: 1997a, 'Announcing the Foundation of the Intangibles Research Center at the Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting Research', Accounting Horizons 11, 136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B.: 1997b, 'The Old Rules No Longer Work', Forbes 7 (April), 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B.: 1999, 'Penetrating the Book-to-Market Black Box: The R &D Effect', Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 26, 419–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B.: 2000, 'Knowledge Management: Fad or Need?', Research Technology Management 43, 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B. and P. Zarowin: 1999, 'The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them', Journal of Accounting Research 37, 353–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H.: 1965, 'Vitality of the Comparable Earnings Standard for Regulation of Utilities in a Growth Economy', Yale Law Journal (May 1965), 988–1018.

  • Lindsay, R. L. and A. W. Sametz: 1968, Financial Management: An Analytical Approach (Homewood, Irwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, R.: 1995, The Making of an American Capitalist (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. and M. Scholes: 1972, 'Rate of Return in Relation to Risk: A Re-examination of Some Recent Findings', in M. Jensen (ed.), The Theory of Capital Markets (Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, T. J. and M. Grinblatt: 1999, 'Do Industries Explain Momentum', Journal of Finance 54, 1249–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nofsinger, J., and R. Sias: 1999, 'Herding and Feedback by Institutional and Individual Investors', Journal of Finance 54, 2263–2295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulo, S.: 1992, 'The Weighted Average Cost of Capital: A Caveat', The Engineering Economist 37(2), 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, M. R.: 1981, 'A New Empirical Perspective on the CAPM', Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 16, 439–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. A. and C. Lanfraconi: 2001, 'Financial Reporting: Communicating Intellectual Property', Ivey Business Journal 65, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R.: 1983, 'Vas Ist Das? The Turn of the Year Effect and Return Premium of Small Firms', Journal of Portfolio Management 9, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R.: 1984, 'Orange Juice and the Weather', American Economic Review 74, 861–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R.: 1988, 'R2', Journal of Finance 43, 541–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U.: 2000, Research Methods for Business, 3 ed. (John Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevlin, T.: 1996, 'The Value-relevance of Nonfinancial Information: A Discussion', Journal of Accounting and Economics 22, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J.: 1981, 'Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Dividends?', American Economic Review 71, 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J.: 1989, Market Volatility (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J.: 2000, Irrational Exuberance (Princeton University Press, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkowitz, M. A. and W. L. Beedles: 1978, 'Diversification in a Three-Moment World', Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 13, 903–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, E.: 1963, The Theory of Financial Management (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. A.: 1998, 'Real Assets, Unreal Reporting', Fortune (July 6), 116–117.

  • Stewart, T. A.: 2001, 'Accounting Gets Radical', Fortune 16 (April), 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickel, S.: 1985, 'The Effect of Value Line Investment Survey Changes on Common Stock Prices', Journal of Financial Economics 14, 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wermers, R.: 1999, 'Mutual Fund Herding and the Impact on Stock Prices. Journal of Finance 54, 581–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yook K. C. and G. M. McCabe: 2001, 'MVA and the Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns', Journal of Portfolio Management 27, 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paulo, S. Epistemology, Research Methodology and Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence Versus Eva® . Journal of Business Ethics 44, 327–341 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023692518377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023692518377

Navigation