Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring Research Potentials and Applications for Multi-stakeholder Learning Dialogues

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Varying conceptions of and purposes for dialogue exist. Recent dialogic theorists and advocates urge exploration of forms of dialogue for learning and applying relational responsibilities within stakeholder networks. A related phenomenon has been the recent emergence of multi-stakeholder dialogues that involve parties significantly affected by major issues or concerns, such as environmental sustainability, that have complex and wide-spread implications. The extent to which these recent multi-stakeholder dialogues assume anything resembling the relationship or caring and the learning potentials of dialogic goals and processes suggested by recent advocates, however, can certainly be questioned. This article explores potential directions for research on enhanced forms of multi-stakeholder dialogues that emphasize goals of dialogic learning, relationship building, and business social responsiveness within a more reflective practice of corporate citizenship. Many issues and questions concerning appropriate antecedents, processes, and outcomes for these enhanced multi-stakeholder dialogues are raised and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. L. Ackoff (1999) Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21st Century Oxford University Press New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Argyris R. Putnam D. Smith (1985) Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • AIDSEnvironment: 2001, ‘Multiple Stakeholders Dialogues and Think Tanks on Complex Environmental Issues’, Retrieved June 5, 2001. http://www.aidenvironment.org/online/stakeholder.php.

  • R. Ashkenas D. Ulrich S. Kerr (1998) The Boundaryless Organization: Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structures Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Beaulieu J. Pasquero (2002) Reintroducing Stakeholder Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking: A Negotiated-order Perspective J. Andriof S. Waddock S. Rahman B. Husted (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Theory, Vol.1 Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield, UK 101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Benhabib (1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Post-modernism in Contemporary Ethics Polity Press New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Innovation in Management: 2003, ‘Workshop Host’, Retrieved November 12, 2003. http://www.cim.sfu.ca/workshop/page5.html.

  • M. Clarkson (1995) ArticleTitleA Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 92–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Climate Friendly Technology: 2001, ‘2000 Forum on Climate Change,’ Retrieved June 6, 2001. http://www. oecd.org/env/docs/cc/comenvepocieaslt(2000)1.pdf.

  • A. Crane S. Livesey (2003) ‘Are You Talking to Me? Stakeholder Communication and the Risks and Rewards of Dialogue, J. Andriof S. Waddock S. Rahman B. Husted (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Theory, Vol.2 Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield, UK 39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Daboub J.M. Calton (2002) ArticleTitleStakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks Journal of Business Ethics 41 IssueID(1/2) 85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Deetz D. Cohen P. Edley (1997) ‘Toward a Dialogic Ethic in the Context of International Business Organization R. Casmir (Eds) Ethics in Intercultural and International Communication Lawrence Erlebaum Mahwah, NJ 183–226

    Google Scholar 

  • DIA-logos: 2003, ‘Dialogue,’ Retrieved November 12, 2003. http://www.dialogos-inc.com/dialogue/.

  • J.S. Dryzek (1987) ArticleTitleComplexity and Rationality in Public Life Political Studies 35 424–442

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Ellinor G. Gerard (1993) Reflections on Building Blocks and Guidelines for Dialogue The Dialogue Group Laguna Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • European Partners for the Environment: 2003, ‘Multi-stakeholder Dialogue on Sustainable Growth in Textiles,’ Retrieved November 12, 2003. http://www. epe.be/visionlab/index.html.

  • R. E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Pitman Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Freeman (1994) ArticleTitleThe Politics of Stakeholder Theory Business Ethics Quarterly 4 IssueID4 409–421

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Goodpaster (1991) ArticleTitleBusiness Ethics and Stakeholder Theory Business Ethics Quarterly 1 IssueID1 53–73

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Heron (1996) Co-operative Inquiry Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Isaacs (1999) Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together Currency-Doubleday New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • International Forum on Capacity Building: 2003, ‘Report on the Global Conference’, Retrieved November 12, 2003. http://www.alop.or.cr/IFCB/Documents/Gcrepo3.doc.

  • M. Kapstein R. Von Tulder (2003) ArticleTitleEffective Stakeholder Dialogues Business and Society Review 108 IssueID2 203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • A. T. Lawrence (2002) The Drivers of Stakeholder Engagement: Reflections on the Case of Royal Dutch Shell J. Andriof S. Waddock S. Rahman B. Husted (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Theory, Vol.1 Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield, UK 185–200

    Google Scholar 

  • S. McNamee K. J. Gergen (1999) Relational Responsibilities: Resources for Sustainable Dialogue Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • New Context Consulting Service: 2003, ‘New Context Consulting,’ Retrieved November 12, 2003. http://www.newcontextconsulting.com/service_text_1tier. htm.

  • H. Owen (1997) Open Space Technology: User’s Guide Berrett-Koehler San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Payne J.M. Calton (2002) ArticleTitleToward a Managerial Practice of Stakeholder Engagement: Developing Multi-Stakeholder Learning Dialogues Journal of Corporate Citizenship 6 IssueID2 37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Pruzan (2001) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Reputation: Image and Identity’ Corporate Reputation Review 4 IssueID1 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand Environment: 2001. ‘Stakeholder Dialogues and Consensus Building,’ Retrieved June 5, 2001. http://www.rand.org/scitech/environment/services/stakeholder.html.

  • V. Richardson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Stakeholders: What Do “They” Know Opening a Dialogue Public Manager 28 IssueID2 31–33

    Google Scholar 

  • P. M. Senge (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization Doubleday/Currency New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • State of the World Forum: 2001, ‘Multi-stakeholder Dialogues’, Retrieved June 6, 2001. http://www.worldforum.org/commission/dialogues.html.

  • Svendsen, A. and M. Laberge: 2003, ‘Co-creative Power: Engaging Stakeholder Networks for Learning Innovation,’ Retrieved September 27, 2003. http://www.collective wisdominitiative.org/papers/laberge_ wholesystems.htm. 9/27/2003.

  • S. Waddock (2002) Leading Corporate Citizens: Vision, Values, Value Added McGraw-Hill/Irwin Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Weisbord S. Janoff (1995) Future Search: An Action Guide to Finding Common Ground in Organizations and Communities Berrett-Koehler San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • W. F. Whyte (1991) Participatory Action Research Sage Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development: 2001. ‘An Overview of Our Work,’ Retrieved June 5, 2001. http://www.wbcsd.ch/corp1.htm.

  • Yosie, T. F. and T. D. Herbst: 1998, ‘Using Stakeholder Processes in Environmental Decision Making: An Evaluation of Lessons Learned, Key Issues, and Future Challenges,’ Retrieved June 20, 2001. http://www.risk.world.com/Nreports/1998/STAKEHOLD/HTML/nr98aa01.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen L. Payne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Payne, S., Calton, J. Exploring Research Potentials and Applications for Multi-stakeholder Learning Dialogues. J Bus Ethics 55, 71–78 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1570-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1570-1

Keywords

Navigation