Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Findings from a European survey on current bioethics training activities in hospitals

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While much work has been done on improving undergraduate education in bioethics, particularly in medicine, less has been said about continuing education of health care workers, particularly non-medical and nursing personnel. Hospitals bring together a variety of professional and non-professional groups in the place where clinical dilemmas are daily events, and would seem ideal places to conduct an ongoing bioethics dialogue. Yet evidence that this is being achieved is sparse.

The European Hospital (-Based) Bioethics Program (EHBP) brings together both current and aspirant members of the EU as partners in a project that aims to assess the current situation with regard to bioethics education in hospitals, identify shortfalls, and address these. In order to achieve the first objective of the EHBP a survey of the current training activities (focused on activities in hospitals) in clinical bioethics in Europe was carried out. The results are presented in this paper, along with a discussion about the implications for the EHBP to address these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Capron L. (1999). Stages Hospitalier et Formation Medicale Universitaire. Laennec 48(2):2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibach U. (2004). Klinisches Ethik-Komitee und Etisches Konsil im Krankenhaus. Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 50(1):21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope T. et al. (1999). L’insegnamento dell’etica medica agli studenti degli anni clinici di Oxford. In: Cattorini P. (eds), Insegnare l’etica medica — Obiettivi e metodi di valutazione dell’apprendimento. Milano, Franco Angeli, pp. 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Neitzke G. (2004). Ethik im Medizinstudium Erfahrungen und innovative Entwiclungen an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover. Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 50(1):61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Stew G. (2005). ‘Learning together in practice: a survey of interprofessional education in clinical settings in South-East England’, J Interprof Care 19(3):223–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ten Have H., Gordijn B. (eds) (2001). Bioethics in a European Perspective. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publisher

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  • Ausilio M.P., Arnold R.M. and Younger S.J. (2003). Ethics Consultation: from Theory to Practice. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain J.M., Elkins T., Bernard P.F. (1994). ‘The Status of Ethics Education in Obstetrics and Gynecolgy’, Obstet. Gynecol. 83:315–320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comitato Nazionale per la Bioetica (Italiano): 1991, Bioetica e Formazione nel Sistema Sanitario, Roma: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Dipartimento per l’informazione e l’Editoria.

  • Malherbe J.F., Dethrier L., Ravez L. (1996). La fonction éthique dans le monde hospitalier. Ethica Clinica 1(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Viafora, C. (ed.): 2005, Clinical Bioethics, Springer Publishing.

  • Wear S. (1991). ‘The Irreducibly Clinical Character of Bioethics’, J. Med. Philos. 16:53–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO/SHEG: 1984, Research in Health Promotion: Priorities, Strategies, Barriers, Report of a workshop, Geneve.

  • WHO: 1987, Innovative Tracks at Established Institutions for the Education of Health Personnel, Offseet. Publ. 101, Geneve.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all those who participated in the European Hospital (-Based) Bioethics Program (EHBP), which was financed by the European Commission within the Fifth Framework Program (Contract no. QLG6-CT-2002-30571): N. Steinkamp, The Netherlands, M. Guerrier, France, J. De Melo, Portugal, S. Holm, United Kingdom, F.J. Illhardt, Germany, M. Zwitter, Slovenia, J. Glasa, The Slovak Republic, T. Brzostek and Z. Zalewski, Poland, E. Gefenas, Lithuania, A. Semplicini and Cinzia Montagna, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Putoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pegoraro, R., Putoto, G. Findings from a European survey on current bioethics training activities in hospitals. Med Health Care Philos 10, 91–96 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9013-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9013-7

Keywords

Navigation