Skip to main content
Log in

CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While corporate social responsibility (CSR) is becoming a mainstream issue for many organizations, most of the research to date addresses CSR in large businesses rather than in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), because it is too often considered a prerogative of large businesses only. The role of SMEs in an increasingly dynamic context is now being questioned, including what factors might affect their socially responsible behaviour. The goal of this paper is to make a comparison of SME and large firm CSR strategies. Furthermore, size of the firm is analyzed as a factor that influences specific choices in the CSR field, and studied by means of a sample of 3,680 Italian firms. Based on a multi-stakeholder framework, the analysis provides evidence that large firms are more likely to identify relevant stakeholders and meet their requirements through specific and formal CSR strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Besser, T. L. 1999. Community Involvement and the Perception of Success among Small Business Operators in Small Towns Journal of Small Business Management 37(4): 16–30

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 2003. Smes in Europe 2003. Enterprise Publications, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., B. van de Ven, N. Stoffele 2003. Strategies and Instruments for Organising Csr by Small and Large Businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics 47(1): 45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson D. 2004 How Csr Contribute to the Competitiveness of Europe in a More Sustainable World. The world Bank Institute and the CSR Resource Centre, Netherlands, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson D. 2005. Small and Medium Sized Enterprises and Corporate Social Responsibility: Identifying the Knowledge Gaps. Opening Remarks, Small and Medium Sized Enterprises and Corporate Social Responsibility: Identifying the knowledge gaps. Durham Business School, Durham, UK, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W., D. B. Turban 2000. Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce Business & Society 39(3): 254–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch, A., H. P. Meister, R. Schmidpeter 2001. Corporate Citizenship as Investing in Social Capital. Logos-Verlag, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D., N. Rogovsky, T. W. Dunfee 2002. The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 44(2): 110–125

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT 2001. 8° Censimento Generale Dell’industria E Dei Servizi 2001. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. 2004. A Critique of Conventional Csr Theory: An Sme Perspective. Journal of General Management 29(4): 37–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., N. Lee 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility. Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Molteni, M., M. Lucchini 2004. I Modelli di responsabilità sociale nelle imprese italiane. FrancoAngeli, Milano, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. 2006. The Practitioner’s Perspective on Non-Financial Reporting California Management Review 48(2): 73–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini , F., S. Pogutz, A. Tencati 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility in Italy: State of the Art Journal of Business Strategies 23(1): 65–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, F., G. Becattini, W. Sengenberger 1990. Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-Operation in Italy. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J. 1999. Does Size Matter? The State of the Art in Small Business Ethics Business Ethics: A European Review 8(3): 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., R. Jeurissen, R. Rutherfoord 2000. Small Business and the Environment in the Uk and the Netherlands: Toward Stakeholder Cooperation Business Ethics Quarterly 10(4): 945–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.J., J. F. Lozano 2000. Communicating About Ethics with Small Firms: Experiences from the U.K And Spain. Journal of Business Ethics 27(1): 43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., R. Rutherfoord 2003. Small Business and Empirical Perspectives in Business Ethics: Editorial Journal of Business Ethics 47(1): 1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., R. Schmidpeter 2003. Smes, Social Capital and the Common Good Journal of Business Ethics 45(1–2): 93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., R. Schmidpeter, A. Habisch 2003. Assessing Social Capital: Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Germany and the U.K Journal of Business Ethics 47(1): 17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A., F. Perrini, S. Pogutz 2004. New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior Journal of Business Ethics 53(1–2): 173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. K., H. L. Smith 1991. Social Responsibility and Small Business: Suggestions for Research Journal of Small Business Management 29(January): 30–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley F. 2000. Small Firm Environmental Ethics: How Deep Do They Go? Business Ethics: A European Review 9(1): 31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyakarnam, S., A. Bailey, A. Myers, D. Burnett 1997. Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behaviour in Small Firms Journal of Business Ethics 16(15): 1625–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been developed with the support of Unioncamere, which the authors gratefully acknowledge. We also thank Geoff Moore, Laura Spence, Clodia Vurro and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Participants at the conference “Small and Medium Sized Enterprises and Corporate Social Responsibility: Identifying the Knowledge Gaps”, held in December 2005 at the Durham Business School, UK, are also gratefully acknowledged for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angeloantonio Russo.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Factor analysis

Factor analysis has been used to identifying groups of CSR strategies that characterize Italian firms. In the following table, factors identified and variables included in the analysis, and loadings for each variable are presented.

 

Factor

Definition

Variable

Definition

Loading

1

Environmental management

Firms implement specific CSR strategies that focus on protecting and safeguarding their natural environment

Pollution reduction

Did you implement programmes for pollution reduction beyond legal requirements?

0.69

 

Noise reduction

Did you implement programmes for noise reduction beyond legal requirements?

0.68

 

Energy reduction

Did you implement programmes for energy reduction beyond legal requirements?

0.65

 

Water reduction

Did you implement programmes for water reduction beyond legal requirements?

0.64

 

Waste management

Did you implement programmes for waste management beyond legal requirements?

0.61

 

Packaging recovery

Did you implement programmes for packaging recovery beyond legal requirements?

0.50

 

Alternative energy

Did you implement programmes for developing alternative energy beyond legal requirements?

0.50

 

EMAS (Eco−Management and Audit Scheme) and ISO14001

Do you have EMAS and/or ISO14001 in your firm?

0.46

2

Employment

Employees are in central position within the firm; firms implement specific CSR strategies to improve employment and working conditions

Briefing with employeesCorporate internal

Do you have periodic briefings with your employees?

0.69

 

communication

Do you facilitate internal communication (e.g. intranet, corporate magazine, newsletter, etc.)?

0.69

 

Corporate activities for employees benefit

Do you organize corporate events (e.g. travels, tournaments, etc.)?

0.64

   

Training activities

Do you implement training programmes for your employees?

0.60

   

Integrative medical care

Do you provide your employees with integrative medical care?

0.58

   

Flexible working time

Do your employees benefit from flexible work time?

0.53

3

Supply chain

Firms are likely to promote CSR culture outside the firm, since specific CSR policies (i.e. certifications such as self-certification, ISO 9001:2000, SA8000 and other certifications; product quality; waste recovery; ethical code) are required along the supply chain to suppliers and customers

Suppliers’ selection

Do you ask for specific certifications from your suppliers?

−0.85

 

Customers’ selection

Do you ask for specific certifications from your customers?

−0.83

4

Local community

Firms promote their CSR strategies outside the firm and enhance their relation with local communities through specific instruments and activities

Corporate advertising

Did you communicate social messages within your advertising?

0.67

 

Sponsorship

Did you carry out sponsorship activities?

0.65

 

Cause-related marketing

Is your company involved in cause-related marketing?

0.62

 

Giving

Did you make donations to the community?

0.54

5

Controlling and reporting

Firms are likely to implement social, environmental and sustainability reporting and disclosure through specific instruments

Ethical code

Do you have a public available ethical code?

0.57

 

Social report

Do you have a social report?

0.56

 

SA8000

Do you have SA8000 certification?

0.55

 

Environmental report

Do you have an environmental report?

0.53

6

Community volunteering

Firms support and motivation of employees toward specific socially responsible behaviours outside the firm

Volunteering

Do you encourage your employees toward volunteer activities?

0.65

 

Subsidised financing

Do you provide your employees with subsidised finance?

0.43

Each variable refers to the questions posed to the Italian firms to identify CSR strategies generally implemented. Variables have been measured as follows. A discrete variable was created for each CSR␣strategy and coded 1 if firms implement a specific strategy, 2 if firms are going to implement a␣specific strategy, 3 if firms do not implement, but are considering the opportunity to implement a specific strategy, 4 if firms do not implement a specific strategy, 5 if firms do not answer the question. Running the factor analysis, we first check for multicollinearity among variables. Looking at correlation matrix, the variable “Do you hire disadvantaged persons?” was eliminated since it correlated with no other variables. We also looked at the determinant of the correlation matrix that was 0.025, extremely greater than the necessary value of 0.00001. Therefore, we concluded that multicollinearity was not a problem for these data. We also controlled for the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy, which was 0.837, suggesting distinct and reliable factors, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity, which was strongly significant (p < 0.01), suggesting that there are relationships between the variables we include in the analysis. Then, looking at scree plot and eigenvalues, we decided to extract six factors, accounting for about 42% of the variance in our research model, but presenting better results than the 8 factors obtained considering those factors with eigenvalues above the rule of thumb of 1. To make clearer which variables relate to which factors, we decided to choose the direct oblimin method of oblique rotation, since there were good reasons to suppose that the underlying factors could be related in theoretical terms. For example, consider that it would be obvious that firms taking into due account environmental management are also more willing to publish an environmental report. While extracting the six factors, we checked for reproduced correlations, with the knowledge that there are 117 (33%) non-redundant residuals with absolute values greater than 0.05, a good result that illustrates the difference between observed and reproduced correlations in our analysis. Finally, in the above table we reported the loading factors above 0.4, ignoring the plus or minus sign, obtained in the structure matrix; the same results were obtained in the pattern matrix, providing evidence of the good results of this analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perrini, F., Russo, A. & Tencati, A. CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy. J Bus Ethics 74, 285–300 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9235-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9235-x

Keywords

Navigation