Skip to main content
Log in

Indeterminate Preferences

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that preferences are determinate; that is, that an agent who has a preference knows that she has the preference in question and is disposed to act upon it. This paper argues the dubiousness of that assumption. An account of indeterminate preferences in terms of self-predicting subjective probabilities is given, and a decision rule for choices involving indeterminate preferences is proposed. Wolfgang Spohn’s and Isaac Levi’s arguments against self-predicting probabilities are also considered, in light of Wlodek Rabinowicz’s recent criticism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Broome J. (1998). ‘Is Incommensurability Vagueness?’. in R. Chang (eds)., in Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Harvard University Press, 67–89. Reprinted in Broome’s book Ethics Out of Economics, 123–44.

  • E. Carlsson (2004) ArticleTitle‘Broome’s Argument Against Value Incomparability’ Utilitas 16 220–224 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0953820804000548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Cantwell (2003) ArticleTitle‘On the Foundations of Pragmatic Arguments’ Journal of Philosophy 100 383–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D. (1980): ‘How is Weakness of the Will Possible’, in Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press.

  • DeFinetti, B. (1974-5): Theory of Probabilty, 2 vols., Wiley.

  • DeGroot M. H. (1970): Optimal Statistical Decisons, McGraw-Hill.

  • P. Gerrans (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Theory of Mind Module in Evolutionary Psychology’ Biology and Philosophy 17 305–321 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1020183525825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson S. O. (2001) : The Structure of Values and Norms, Cambridge University Press.

  • J. M. Joyce (2002) ArticleTitle‘Levi on Causal Decision Theory and the Possibility of Predicting One’s Own Actions’ Philosophical Studies 110 69–102 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1019839429878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I. (1989): ‘Rationality, Prediction, and Autonomous Choice’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (Suppl), 339–362. Re-printed in Levi, I. (1997): The Covenant of Reason, Cambridge University Press.

  • Luce R.D. (1959/2005): Individual Choice Behaviour. A Theoretical Analysis, John Wiley and Sons.

  • W. Rabinowicz (2002) ArticleTitle‘Does Practical Deliberation Crowd Out Self-Prediction’ Erkenntnis 57 91–122 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1020106622032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1926): ‘Truth and Probability’, in . Mellor (ed.), Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logics, and Methematics and Economics, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.

  • L. J. Savage (1954) The Foundations of Statistics EditionNumber2 Wiley and Sons Dover

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Spohn (1977) ArticleTitle‘Where Luce and Krantz Do Really Generalize Savage’s Decision Model’ Erkenntnis 11 113–134 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00169847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (2004): ‘Loss Aversion and Prefrence Imprecision’, paper presented at 11th International Conference on the Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decison Theory.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Peterson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, M. Indeterminate Preferences. Philos Stud 130, 297–320 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-4515-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-4515-8

Keywords

Navigation