Abstract
Wittgenstein’s language games can be put into a wider service by virtue of elements they share with some contemporary opinions concerning logic and the semantics of computation. I will give two examples: manifestations of language games and their possible variations in logical studies, and their role in some of the recent developments in computer science. It turns out that the current paradigm of computation that Girard termed Ludics bears a striking resemblance to members of language games. Moreover, the kind of interrelations that are emerging could be scrutinised from the viewpoint of logic that virtually necessitates game-theoretic conceptualisations, demonstrating the fact that the meaning of utterances may, in many situations, be understood as Wittgenstein’s language games of ‘showing or telling what one sees’. This provides motivation for the use of games in relation to logic and formal semantics that some commentators have called for. Many of the ideas can be traced to C.S. Peirce, for whom signs were vehicles of strategic communication. The conclusion about Wittgenstein is that the notions of saying and showing converge in his late philosophy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramsky, Samson and R. Jagadeesan, 1994. Games and full completeness for multiplicative linear logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic 59, 543–574.
Blass, Andreas, 1972. Degrees of indeterminacy of games, Fundamenta Mathematica 77, 151–166.
Blass, Andreas, 1992. A game semantics for linear logic, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 56, 183–220.
Blass, Andreas, 1994. Is game semantics necessary?, in Börger, E., Gurevich, Y., and Meinke, K., (eds) Computer Science Logic, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 832, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 66–77.
Blass, Andreas, 1997. Some semantical aspects of linear logic, Logic Journal of the IGPL 5, 487–502.
Geach, Peter, 1976. Saying and Showing in Wittgenstein and Frege, in Hintikka, J., (ed.) Essays in Honour of G.H. von Wright, Acta Philosophical Fennica 28, 54–70.
Gentzen, Gerhard, 1969. The consistency of elementary number theory, in Szabo, M.E., (ed.) The Collected Works of Gerhard Gentzen, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 132–213.
Girard, Jean-Yves, 1998. On the meaning of logical rules I: syntax vs. semantics, ms. Available electronically at http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/pub/girard/.
Girard, Jean-Yves, 2001. Locus Solum: From the rules of logic to the logic of rules, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 11, 301–506. (The page numbers refer to ms. electronically available at http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/pub/girard/.)
Goldstein, Laurence, 1989. Wittgenstein and Paraconsistency, in Priest, G., Routley, F.R., and Norman, J., (eds.) Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent, Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 540–562.
Hacking, Ian, 1979. What is logic?, Journal of Philosophy 76, 285–319.
Hilbert, David, 1926. Über das Unendliche, Mathematische Annalen 95, 161–190.
Hintikka, Jaakko, 1973. Logic, Language-Games and Information, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hintikka, Jaakko, 1987. Game-theoretical semantics as a synthesis of verificationist and truth-conditional meaning theories, in LePore, E., (ed.) New Directions in Semantics, Academic Press, 235–258.
Hintikka, Jaakko, 1996. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half-Truths (Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers, Vol. 1), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hintikka, Jaakko and Merrill B. Hintikka 1986. Investigating Wittgenstein, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hodges, Wilfrid, 2001a. Dialogue Foundations I: A sceptical look, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 75, 17–32.
Hodges, Wilfrid, 2001b. Logic and games, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-and-games/.
Leonard, Robert J., 1995. From parlor games to social science: von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the creation of game theory 1928–1944, Journal of Economic Literature 23, 730–761.
Malcolm, Norman, 1958. Ludwig Wittgenstein: a Memoir, London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Maynard Smith, John and G. Price 1973. The Logic of Animal Conflict, Nature 246, 15–18.
Menger, Karl, 1994. Reminiscences of the Vienna Circle and the Mathematical Colloquium, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Peirce, Charles S., 1923. Chance, Love, and Logic: Philosophical Essays (ed. by Morris R. Cohen, with an essay by John Dewey), London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Peirce, Charles S., 1931–58. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., ed. by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and A.W. Burks. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, Charles S., 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce (Amherst: University of Massachusettes Press, 1967), and in ‘The Peirce Papers: A supplementary catalogue’, Transactions of the C.S. Peirce Society 7 (1971), 37–57.
Peirce Charles S., 1998. The Essential Peirce 2, Peirce Edition Project, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko, 2000. Logic and coherence in the light of competitive games, Logique et Analyse 43, 371–391.
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko, 2003b. Semantic games in logic and epistemology, to appear in Gabbay, D., Van Bendegem, J.P., Rahman, S. and Symons, J. (eds.), Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science, Kluwer.
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko, 2003c. Games as formal tools versus games as explanations in logic and science, Foundations of Science 8, 317–364.
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko, 2003d. Diagrammatic logic and game-playing, to appear in Malcolm, G., (ed.) Multidisciplinary Studies of Visual Representations and Interpretations, Elsevier Science.
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko, 2003e. Peirce’s game-theoretic ideas in logic, Semiotica 144, 33–47.
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko, and Gabriel Sandu, 2003. IF logic, game-theoretical semantics, and philosophy of science, to appear in Rahman, S., Symons, J., Gabbay, D.M., and van Bendegem, J.P., (eds) Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science, Kluwer.
Ramsey, Frank P., 1991. On Truth: Original Manuscript Materials (1927–1929) from the Ramsey Collection at the University of Pittsburgh (ed.by Nicholas Rescher and Ulrich Majer), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rhees, Rush, 2002. Five topics in conversation with Wittgenstein (Numbers; concept-formation; time-reactions; induction; causality), Philosophical Investigations 25, 1–19.
Roberts, Don D., 1973. The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague: Mouton.
Sandu, Gabriel and Ahti Pietarinen 2001. Partiality and games: Propositional logic, Logic Journal of the IGPL 9, 107–127.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, 1982. The Wittgenstein Papers, in von Wright, G.H., Wittgenstein, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 36–62.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1953. Philosophical Investigations, (third edition 1967), Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1956. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1970. Zettel, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1978. Philosophical Grammar, Columbia: University of California Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1998–2000. Wittgenstein’s Nachlass, The Bergen Electronic Edition, The Wittgenstein Trustees, The University of Bergen, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. (The transcription used is the diplomatic transcription.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pietarinen, AV. Logic, language games and ludics. Acta Anal 18, 89–123 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-003-1016-x
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-003-1016-x