Abstract
Exposure to inescapable shock is known to proactively interfere with the acquisition of instrumental responses to escape shock, as well as to obtain food. These effects have been termed learned helplessness. The present experiment investigated the possibility that the learned helplessness effect observed in an appetitive context may, at least in part, be due to the motivational effects of inescapable shock. The schedule-induced polydipsia paradigm, which is known to be sensitive to both deprivation level and incentive motivation, was used to assess the effects of inescapable shock on appetitive motivation. Despite the fact that learned helplessness was demonstrated in a shuttle escape task, no effect of inescapable shock was observed on polydipsia. Thus, the reinforcer generality of helplessness appears not to be due to shockinduced motivational factors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caspy, T., & Lubow, R. E. (1981). Generality of US preexposure effects: Transfer from food to shock or shock to food with and without the same response requirement. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 524–532.
Falk, J. L. (1961). Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule. Science, 133, 195–196.
Flory, R. K. (1971). The control of schedule-induced polydipsia: Frequency and magnitude of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 2, 215–227.
Freed, E., & Hymowitz, N. (1972). Effects of schedule, percent body weight, and magnitude of reinforcer on acquisition of schedule-induced polydipsia. Psychological Reports, 31, 95–101.
Goodkin, F. (1976). Rats learn the relationship between responding and environmental events: An expansion of the learned helplessness hypothesis. Learning and Motivation, 7, 382–393.
Maier, S. F., & Jackson, R. L. (1979). Learned helplessness: All of us were right (and wrong): Inescapable shock has multiple effects. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 155–218). New York: Academic Press.
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1976). Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 3–46.
Rapaport, P. M. & Maier, S. F. (1978). Inescapable shock and food-competition dominance in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 6, 160–165.
Roper, T. J., & Nieto, J. (1979). Schedule-induced drinking and other behavior in the rat, as a function of body weight deficit. Physiology & Behavior, 23, 673–678.
Rosellini, R. A. (1978). Inescapable shock interferes with the acquisition of a free appetitive operant. Animal Learning & Behavior, 6, 155–159.
Rosellini, R. A., & DeCola, J. P. (1981). Inescapable shock interferes with the acquisition of a low-activity response in an appetitive context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 87–490.
Rosellini, R. A., DeCola, J. P., & Shapiro, N. R. (1982). Cross-motivational effects of inescapable shock are associative in nature. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 376–388.
Rosellini, R. A., & Lashley, R. L. (1982). The opponent-process theory of motivation: VIII. Quantitative and qualitative manipulations of food both modulate adjunctive behavior. Learning and Motivation, 13, 222–239.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plonsky, M., Warren, D.A. & Rosellini, R.A. The effects of inescapable shock on appetitive motivation. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 22, 229–231 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333813
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333813