Abstract
The discussion of the adaptive landscape in the philosophical literature appears to be divided along the following lines. On the one hand, some claim that the adaptive landscape is either “uninterpretable” or incoherent. On the other hand, some argue that the adaptive landscape has been an important heuristic, or tool in the service of explaining, as well as proposing and testing hypotheses about evolutionary change. This paper attempts to reconcile these two views.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
However, this is not exactly correct. Wright makes assumptions such that when you collapse many dimensions into a few, you get a continuous surface. This assumption was false, but that is a different matter from Provine’s objection.
Or, according to a reviewer: “when you collapse lots of dimensions into a few, you'd get a nearly continuous surface.” Thanks for these comments.
Thanks to Mark Kirkpatrick for bringing this to my attention.
Thanks to a reviewer for these comments.
Thanks again to Mark Kirkpatrick for pointing this out.
References
Achinstein P (1964) Models, analogies and theories. Philosophy of Science 31:328–350
Campbell NR (1920) Physics: the elements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts
Dobzhansky T (1937/1951) Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York
Duhem P (1954) The aim and structure of physical theory (trans: Wiener PP). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gavrilets S (2004) Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hesse M (1966) Models and analogies in science. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana
Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kirkpatrick M, Rousset F (2005) Wright meets AD: not all landscapes are adaptive. J Evol Biol 18:1166–1169
Lande R (1976) Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314–334
Lande R (1979) Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33:402–416
Lewontin RC (1978) Adaptation. Sci Am 239(3):157–169
Lewontin RC, White MJD (1960) Interaction between inversion polymorphisms of two chromosome pairs in the grasshopper, Moraba scurra. Evolution 14(1):116–129
Mayr E (1954) Change of genetic environment and evolution. In: Huxley J, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a process. George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., London, pp 157–180
Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA
Moran PAP (1964) On the nonexistence of adaptive topographies. Annu Rev Human Genet Lond 27:383–393
Morgan M, Morrison M (1999) Models as mediators: perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (2006) Making sense of evolution: the conceptual foundations of evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Provine W (1986) Sewall Wright and evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ruse M (1990) Are pictures really necessary? The case of Sewall Wright’s adaptive landscapes. In: Fine A, Forbes M, Wessels L (eds) PSA 1990. pp 63–77
Skipper R (2004) The heuristic role of Sewall Wright’s 1932 adaptive landscape diagram. In: Proceedings Philosophy of Science Assoc. 18th Biennial Mtg—PSA 2002: PSA 2002 Symposia, Milwaukee, WI
Woody A (2004) More telltale signs: what attention to representation reveals about scientific explanation. PSA 2002 Proc Philos Sci 71:780–793
Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159
Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc 6th Int Congr Genet 1:356–366
Wright S (1949) Adaptation and selection. In: Jepson GL, Simpson GG, Mayr E (eds) Genetics, paleontology, and evolution. pp 365−389
Wright S (1967) “Surfaces” of selective value. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 58:165–172
Wright S (1969) Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol 2: the theory of gene frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plutynski, A. The rise and fall of the adaptive landscape?. Biol Philos 23, 605–623 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9128-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9128-8