Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Real wrongs in virtual communities

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beginning with the well-knowncyber-rape in LambdaMOO, I argue that it ispossible to have real moral wrongs in virtualcommunities. I then generalize the account toshow how it applies to interactions in gamingand discussion communities. My account issupported by a view of moral realism thatacknowledges entities like intentions andcausal properties of actions. Austin's speechact theory is used to show that real people canact in virtual communities in ways that bothestablish practices and moral expectations, andwarrant strong identifications betweenthemselves and their online identities. Rawls'conception of a social practice is used toanalyze the nature of the wrong and thestage-setting aspect of engaging in a practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J.L. Austin. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Cicognani. On the Linguistic Nature of Cyberspace and Virtual Communities. Virtual Reality: Research, Development and Application, vol. 3, pp. 16-24. Springer-Verlag, London, 1998, also available at http://www.arch.su.edu.au/anna/papers/language.pdf, at 22.01.03

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Cicognani and M.L. Maher. Design Speech Acts. 'How to Do Things With Words' in Virtual Communities. Proceedings of CAAD Futures 1997. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian A. Dibbell. A Rape in Cyberspace: How an Evil Clown, a Haitian Trickster Spirit, Two Wizards, and a Cast of Dozens Turned a Database in to a Society. The Village Voice: 36-42, December 23, 1993, also available at http://www.juliandibbell.com/texts/bungle_vv.html, at 24.01.03.

  • Nelson Goodman. Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Huff, K. Miller and D.G. Johnson. Virtual Harms and Real Responsibility: a Rape in Cyberspace. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23(2), 2003.

  • John Rawls. Two Concepts of Rules. Philosophical Review, 64(1): 3-32, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Simmel. How Is Society Possible? In Donald N. Levine, editor, Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1971 (original work published in 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry Smith. Towards a History of Speech Act Theory. In A. Burkhardt, editor, Speech Acts, Meanings and Intentions. Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Suler and W. Phillips. The Bad Boys of Cyberspace: Deviant Behavior in Multimedia Chat Communities. Cyber-Psychology and Behavior, 1: 275-294, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Thomas M. Powers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Powers, T.M. Real wrongs in virtual communities. Ethics and Information Technology 5, 191–198 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETIN.0000017737.56971.20

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETIN.0000017737.56971.20

Search

Navigation