Skip to main content
Log in

A pragmatic interpretation of intuitionistic propositional logic

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We construct an extension P of the standard language of classical propositional logic by adjoining to the alphabet of a new category of logical-pragmatic signs. The well formed formulas of are calledradical formulas (rfs) of P;rfs preceded by theassertion sign ⊢ constituteelementary assertive formulas of P, which can be connected together by means of thepragmatic connectives N, K, A, C, E, so as to obtain the set of all theassertive formulas (afs). Everyrf of P is endowed with atruth value defined classically, and everyaf is endowed with ajustification value, defined in terms of the intuitive notion of proof and depending on the truth values of its radical subformulas. In this framework, we define the notion ofpragmatic validity in P and yield a list of criteria of pragmatic validity which hold under the assumption that only classical metalinguistic procedures of proof be accepted. We translate the classical propositional calculus (CPC) and the intuitionistic propositional calculus (IPC) into the assertive part of P and show that this translation allows us to interpret Intuitionistic Logic as an axiomatic theory of the constructive proof concept rather than an alternative to Classical Logic. Finally, we show that our framework provides a suitable background for discussing classical problems in the philosophy of logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appiah, A.: 1986,For Truth in Semantics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. and Swartz, N.: 1979,Possible Worlds. An Introduction to Logic and its Philosophy, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1932, ‘Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache”,Erkenntnis II, 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1949, ‘Truth and Confirmation’, collected in H. Feigl and W. Sellars (eds),Readings in Philosophical Analysis, Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., New York (1949), pp. 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1963, ‘Charles Morris on Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism’, collected in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap II, The Library of Living Philosophers Inc., Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1966,Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Basic Books Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellas, B.: 1980,Modal Logic: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Chiara, M. L.: 1974,Logica, ISEDI, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Pozza, C.: 1991, ‘Un' Interpretazione Pragmatica della Logica Proposizionale Intuizionistica’, collected in G. Usberti (ed.),Problemi Fondazionali nella Teoria del Significato, Olschki, Florence (1991), pp. 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1975, ‘What is a Theory of Meaning? 1’, collected in S. D. Guttenplan (ed.),Mind and Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 97–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1976, ‘What is a Theory of Meaning? 2’, collected in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.),Truth and Meaning, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 67–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1977,Elements of Intuitionism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1978,Truth and Other Enigmas, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1979, ‘What Does the Appeal to Use Do for the Theory of Meaning?’, collected in A. Margalit (ed.),Meaning and Use, Reidel, Dordrecht (1979), pp. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1980, ‘Comments on Professor Prawitz's Paper’, collected in G. H. Von Wright (ed.),Logic and Philosophy/Logique et Philosophie, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1982, ‘Realism’,Synthese 52, 55–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitting, M. C.: 1969,Intuitionistic Logic, Model Theory and Forcing, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1879,Begriffschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebieldete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, Nebert, Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1891, ‘Funktion und Begriff’, collected in I. Angelelli (ed.),Frege, G.: Kleine Schriften, Georg Olms, Hildesheim, (1967), pp. 124–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1893,Grundgesetze der Arithmetik 1, Pohle, Jena (Olms, Hildesheim, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1918, ‘Der Gedanke. Eine logische Untersuchung’,Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus I (1918–19), pp. 36–51; collected in I. Angelelli (ed.),Frege, G.: Kleine Schriften, Georg Olms, Hildesheim, (1967), pp. 342–362.

  • Garola, C.: 1991, ‘Classical Foundations of Quantum Logic’,International Journal of Theoretical Physics 30, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C.: 1992a, ‘Semantic Incompleteness of Quantum Physics’,International Journal of Theoretical Physics 31, 809–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C.: 1992b, ‘Quantum Logics Seen as Quantum Testability Theories’,International Journal of Theoretical Physics 31, 1639–1652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C.: 1992c, ‘Truth versus Testability in Quantum Logic’,Erkenntnis 37, 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C.: 1993, ‘Questioning Locality: an Operational Critique to Bell's Theorem’, collected in C. Garola and A. Rossi (eds.),The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Historical Analysis and Open Questions, Kluwer, Dordrecht (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C.: 1994, ‘Pragmatical versus Semantical Contextuality in Quantum Physics’,International Journal of Theoretical Physics (to appear).

  • Gödel, K.: 1933, ‘Eine Interpretation des Intuitionistischen Aussagenkalküls’,Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums IV, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack, S.: 1974,Deviant Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack, S.: 1978,Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyting, A.: 1934, ‘Mathematische Grundlagenforschung, Intuitionismus, Beweistheorie’,Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 3, Berlin.

  • Heyting, A.: 1956,Intuitionism. An Introduction, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M. J.: 1968,An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen and Co. Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneale, W. C. and Kneale, M.: 1962,The Development of Logic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisel, G.: 1965, ‘Mathematical Logic’, collected in T. L. Saaty (ed.),Lectures on Modern Mathematics III, Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 95–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loar, B.: 1987, ‘Truth Beyond All Verification’, collected in B. M. Taylor (ed.),Michael Dummett, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 81–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P.: 1984,Intuitionistic Type Theory, Bibliopolis, Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1981, ‘Anti-realism and the Epistemology of Understanding’, collected in H. Perrett and J. Bouveresse (eds.),Meaning and Understanding, De Gruyter, Berlin (1981), pp. 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey, J. C. C. and Tarski, A.: 1948, ‘Some Theorems about the Sentential Calculi of Lewis and Heyting’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 13, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, E.: 1964,Introduction to Mathematical Logic, D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriconi, E. and Napoli, E.: 1987, ‘Dimostrazione e Significato’,Lingua e Stile XXII 2, 153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C.: 1963, ‘Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism’, collected in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap I, The Library of Living Philosophers Inc., Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C.: 1981, ‘The Theory of Meaning in Analytical Philosophy’, collected in G. Floistad (ed.),Contemporary Philosophy I, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1969,Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D.: 1977, ‘Meaning and Proof: on the Conflict between Classical and Intuitionistic Logic’,Theoria 43, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D.: 1980, ‘Intuitionistic Logic: A Philosophical Challenge’, collected in G. H. Von Wright (ed.),Logic and Philosophy/Logique et Philosophie, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht (1980), pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D.: 1987, ‘Dummett on a Theory of Meaning and Its Impact on Logic’, collected in B. M. Taylor (ed.),Michael Dummett, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 117–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1978,Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1979, ‘Reference and Understanding’, collected in A. Margalit (ed.),Meaning and Use, Reidel, Dordrecht (1979), pp. 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1980, ‘Referenza/Verita”,Enciclopedia Einaudi 11, 724–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1970,Philosophy of Logic, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1947,Elements of Symbolic Logic, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R.: 1971,Mathematical Logic and Formalized Theories, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1940,An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1950, ‘Logical Positivism’,Revue lnternationale de Philosophie 4, 3–19; collected in Russell, B.,Logic and Knowledge, Allen & Unwin, London (1956), pp. 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. and Vanderveken, D.: 1985,Foundation of Illocutionary Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenius, E.: 1969, ‘Mood and Language-Games’, collected in J. W. Davis, D. Hockney and W. K. Wilson (eds.),Philosophical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.: 1976–1977, ‘Scruton and Wright on Anti-Realism Etc.’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 51, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. M.: 1987, ‘Preface’, in B. M. Taylor (ed.),Michael Dummett, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. IX-XII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1933, ‘Pojecie prawdy w jezykash nauk dedukcyjnych’,Acta Towarzystwei Naukowego i Literakiego Warszawskiego 34, V-116; English Translation, ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, collected in Tarski, A.,Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Blackwell, Oxford (1956), pp. 152–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1944, ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,IV; collected in L. Linsky (ed.),Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dalen, D.: 1986,Intuitionistic Logic, collected in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.),Handbook of Philosophical Logic III, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 225–339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is an enlarged and entirely revised version of the paper by Dalla Pozza (1991) worked out in the framework of C.N.R. project n. 89.02281.08, and published in Italian. The basic ideas in it have been propounded since 1986 by Dalla Pozza in a series of seminars given at the University of Lecce and in other Italian Universities. C. Garola collected the scattered parts of the work, helped in solving some conceptual difficulties and refining the formalism, yielded the proofs of some propositions (in particular, in Section 3) and provided physical examples (see in particular Remark 2.3.1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pozza, C.D., Garola, C. A pragmatic interpretation of intuitionistic propositional logic. Erkenntnis 43, 81–109 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131841

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131841

Keywords

Navigation