The theme of these notes is the relation between verificationism and Quine’s approach to philosophy of language. The main thesis is that a tenable theory of meaning along verificationist lines must distinguish between canonical and indirect verification and that this distinction is related to observable features of language use. It is argued that a theory of meaning along such lines is not vulnerable to Quine’s arguments against verificationism, and suggested that, on the whole, a verificationism of this kind is compatible with Quine’s basic approach to philosophy of language. © 1994 Taylor & Francis Group.
CITATION STYLE
Prawitz, D. (1994). Quine and Verificationism. Inquiry (United Kingdom), 37(4), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749408602369
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.