Abstract
This essay proposes a systematic semantic account of Davidson’s demonstrative theory of pure quotation (Davidson Theory and decision, 11: 27–40, 1979) within a classic Kaplan-style framework for indexical languages (Kaplan 1977). I argue that Davidson’s informal hints must be developed in terms of the idea of ‘character-external’ aspects of meaning, that is, in terms of truth-conditionally idle restrictions on the class of contexts in which quotation marks may appropriately be used. When thus developed, Davidson’s theory may correctly take into account the intuitively special status of disquotational sentences, such as “Boston’ refers to Boston’, and “‘Boston” refers to ‘Boston”, and is thus immune from the important objections recently raised in Cappelen and Lepore 2007.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borg E. (2002) Pointing at Jack, talking about Jill: Understanding Deferred uses of demonstratives and pronouns. Mind and Language 17: 489–512. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00209
Braun D. (1996) Demonstratives and their linguistic meanings. Nous 30(2): 145–173. doi:10.2307/2216291
Caplan B. (2002) Quotation and demonstration. Philosophical Studies 111(1): 69–80. doi:10.1023/A:1021235311442
Caplan B. (2003) Putting things in contexts. Philosophical Review 112(2): 191–214. doi:10.1215/00318108-112-2-191
Cappelen H., Lepore E. (1997) Varieties of quotation. Mind 106(423): 429–450. doi:10.1093/mind/106.423.429
Cappelen H., Lepore E. (2007) Language turned on itself. The semantics and pragmatics of metalinguistic discourse. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Corazza E., Fish W., Gorvett J. (2002) Who is I? Philosophical Studies 107: 1–21. doi:10.1023/A:1013111419036
Davidson, D. (1979a). Quotation. Theory and Decision, 11, 27–40. Reprinted in D. Davidson, Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1979b). Moods and performances. In A. Margalit (Ed.), Meaning and use, Reidel Publishing Company. Reprinted in D. Davidson, Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 109–121). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Garcia-Carpintero M. (1994) Ostensive signs: Against the identity theory of quotation. The Journal of Philosophy 91: 253–264. doi:10.2307/2940753
Garcia-Carpintero M. (2004) The Deferred ostension theory of quotation. Nous 38(4): 674–692. doi:10.1111/j.0029-4624.2004.00488.x
Gomez-Torrente M. (2001) Quotation revisited. Philosophical Studies 102: 123–153. doi:10.1023/A:1004664020280
Kamp H. (1971) Formal Properties of ‘Now’. Theoria 37: 227–273
Kaplan, D. (1977). Demonstratives (ms.). Reprinted in J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), (1989). Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan D. (1989) Afterthoughts. In: Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lewis, D. (1980). Index, context, and content. In S. Kanger & S. Ohman (Eds.), Philosophy and grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in D. Lewis, Papers in Philosophical logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Predelli S. (2005) Contexts: Meaning, truth and the use of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Quine W.V. (1968) Ontological relativity. The Journal of Philosophy 65: 185–212. doi:10.2307/2024305
Reimer M. (1996) Quotation marks: Demonstratives or demonstrations? Analysis 56(3): 131–141. doi:10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00131.x
Saka P. (1998) Quotation and the use-mention distinction. Mind 107(425): 113–136. doi:10.1093/mind/107.425.113
Sidelle A. (1991) The answering machine Paradox. The Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21: 525–539
Washington C. (1992) The identity theory of quotation. The Journal of Philosophy 89(11): 582–605. doi:10.2307/2941057