Skip to main content
Log in

The demonstrative theory of quotation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay proposes a systematic semantic account of Davidson’s demonstrative theory of pure quotation (Davidson Theory and decision, 11: 27–40, 1979) within a classic Kaplan-style framework for indexical languages (Kaplan 1977). I argue that Davidson’s informal hints must be developed in terms of the idea of ‘character-external’ aspects of meaning, that is, in terms of truth-conditionally idle restrictions on the class of contexts in which quotation marks may appropriately be used. When thus developed, Davidson’s theory may correctly take into account the intuitively special status of disquotational sentences, such as “Boston’ refers to Boston’, and “‘Boston” refers to ‘Boston”, and is thus immune from the important objections recently raised in Cappelen and Lepore 2007.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borg E. (2002) Pointing at Jack, talking about Jill: Understanding Deferred uses of demonstratives and pronouns. Mind and Language 17: 489–512. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun D. (1996) Demonstratives and their linguistic meanings. Nous 30(2): 145–173. doi:10.2307/2216291

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan B. (2002) Quotation and demonstration. Philosophical Studies 111(1): 69–80. doi:10.1023/A:1021235311442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan B. (2003) Putting things in contexts. Philosophical Review 112(2): 191–214. doi:10.1215/00318108-112-2-191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen H., Lepore E. (1997) Varieties of quotation. Mind 106(423): 429–450. doi:10.1093/mind/106.423.429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen H., Lepore E. (2007) Language turned on itself. The semantics and pragmatics of metalinguistic discourse. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza E., Fish W., Gorvett J. (2002) Who is I? Philosophical Studies 107: 1–21. doi:10.1023/A:1013111419036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1979a). Quotation. Theory and Decision, 11, 27–40. Reprinted in D. Davidson, Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Davidson, D. (1979b). Moods and performances. In A. Margalit (Ed.), Meaning and use, Reidel Publishing Company. Reprinted in D. Davidson, Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 109–121). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Garcia-Carpintero M. (1994) Ostensive signs: Against the identity theory of quotation. The Journal of Philosophy 91: 253–264. doi:10.2307/2940753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Carpintero M. (2004) The Deferred ostension theory of quotation. Nous 38(4): 674–692. doi:10.1111/j.0029-4624.2004.00488.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Torrente M. (2001) Quotation revisited. Philosophical Studies 102: 123–153. doi:10.1023/A:1004664020280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp H. (1971) Formal Properties of ‘Now’. Theoria 37: 227–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (1977). Demonstratives (ms.). Reprinted in J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), (1989). Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kaplan D. (1989) Afterthoughts. In: Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1980). Index, context, and content. In S. Kanger & S. Ohman (Eds.), Philosophy and grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in D. Lewis, Papers in Philosophical logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Predelli S. (2005) Contexts: Meaning, truth and the use of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W.V. (1968) Ontological relativity. The Journal of Philosophy 65: 185–212. doi:10.2307/2024305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer M. (1996) Quotation marks: Demonstratives or demonstrations? Analysis 56(3): 131–141. doi:10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00131.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saka P. (1998) Quotation and the use-mention distinction. Mind 107(425): 113–136. doi:10.1093/mind/107.425.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidelle A. (1991) The answering machine Paradox. The Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21: 525–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington C. (1992) The identity theory of quotation. The Journal of Philosophy 89(11): 582–605. doi:10.2307/2941057

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Predelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Predelli, S. The demonstrative theory of quotation. Linguist and Philos 31, 555–572 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9042-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9042-1

Keywords

Navigation