Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Philosophical Origins of Mitchell's Chemiosmotic Concepts

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mitchell's formulation of the chemiosmotic theory of oxidative phosphorylation in 1961 lacked any experimental support for its three central postulates. The path by which Mitchell reached this theory is explored. A major factor was the role of Mitchell's philosophical system conceived in his student days at Cambridge. This system appears to have become a tacit influence on his work in the sense that Polanyi understood all knowledge to be generated by an interaction between tacit and explicit knowing.

Early in his life Mitchell had evolved a simple philosophy based on fluctoids, fluctids and statids which was developed in a thesis submitted for the z at the University of Cambridge, England. This aspect of his work was rejected by the examiners and became a tacit element in his intellectual development. It is argued from his various publications that this philosophy can be traced as an underlying theme behind much of Mitchell's theoretical writing in the 50's leading, through his notion of vectorial metabolism, to the formulation and amplification of the chemiosmotic theory in the sixties. This philosophy formed the basis for Mitchell of his understanding of biological systems and gave him his unique approach to cell biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allchin, Douglas. 1997. “A Twentieth-Century Phlogiston: Constructing Error and Differentiating Domains.” Perspectives in Science 5: 81–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, John. 1945. Early Greek Philosophy, 4th ed. London: Adam and Charles Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Jerry H. 2000. The Tacit Mode. Michael Polanyi's Postmodern Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John Burdon Sanderson. 1944. “The Origins of Life.” New Biology 16: 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höber, Rudolph. 1945. Physical Chemistry of Cells and Tissues. London: Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Frederic Lawrence. 1991. Hans Krebs 1. The Formation of a Scientific Life 1900– 1933. Oxford University Press.

  • Holmes, Frederic Lawrence. 1993. Hans Krebs 2. Architect of Intermediary Metabolism 1933– 1937. Oxford University Press.

  • Kaback, H. Ronald. 1968. “The Role of the Phosphoenolpyruvate-phosphotransferase System in the Transport of Sugars by isolated Membrane Preparations of Escherichia coli.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 243: 3711–3724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, Hans. 1981. Reminiscences and Reflections. Oxford University Press.

  • Kundig, Werner, Ghosh, Sudhamoy and Roseman, Saul. 1964. “Phosphate bound to Histidine in a Protein as an Intermediate in a Novel Phospho-Transferase System.” Proceedings of the National. Academy of Sciences, USA 52: 1067–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundegårdh, Henrik. 1954. “Anion Respiration.” Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 8: 262–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmström, Bo. 2000. “Mitchell saw the new Vista, if not the Details.” Nature 403: 356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Peter. 1949. “The Osmotic Barrier in Bacteria.” Symposia of the Society for General Microbiology 1: 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––1957a. “The Origin of Life and the Formation and Organising Functions of Natural Membranes.” A. Oparin (ed.), International Symposium on the Origin of Life. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences, USSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––1957b. “A General Theory of Membrane Transport from Studies of Bacteria.” Nature 180: 134–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ––1959a. “Introducing the Cell Surface.” Proceedings of the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh 28: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––1959b. “Structure and Function in Microorganisms.” Biochemical Society Symposium 16: 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––1959c. “Coupling of Metabolism and Transport by Enzymic Translocation of Substrates through Membranes.” Proceedings of the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh 28: 19–25.

  • ––1961a. “Biological Transport Phenomena and the Spatially Anisotropic Characteristics of Enzyme Systems causing a Vector Component of Metabolism.” Arnost Kleinzeller and A. Kotyk (eds.), Membrane Transport and Metabolism. Prague: Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.

  • ––1961b. “Approaches to the Analysis of Specific Membrane Transport.” Trevor W. Goodwin and Olov Lindberg (eds.), Biological Structure and Function. London: Academic Press, pp. 581–603.

  • ––1961c. “Coupling of Phosphorylation to Electron and Hydrogen Transfer by a Chemiosmotic Type of Mechanism.” Nature 191: 144–148.

  • ––1962a. “Metabolism, Transport, and Morphogenesis: Which drives which?” Journal of General Microbiology 29: 25–37.

  • ––1962b. “Molecule, Group and Electron Transport through Natural Membranes.” Biochemical Journal 83: 22P–23P.

  • ––1979. “David Keilin's Respiratory Chain Concept and its Chemiosmotic Consequences.” Les prix Nobel en 1978. The Nobel Foundation. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International, pp. 134–172.

  • Mitchell, Peter and Moyle, Jennifer. 1956. “Osmotic Function and Structure in Bacteria.” Symposia of the Society for General Microbiology 6: 150–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––1958. “Group Translocation: a Consequence of Enzyme-catalysed Group Transfer.” Nature 182: 372–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ––1959a. “Coupling of Metabolism and Transport by Enzymic Translocation of Substrates through Membranes.” Proceedings of the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh 28: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––1959b. “Coupling of Metabolism and Transport by Enzymic Translocation of Substrates through Membranes.” Proceedings of the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh 28: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Joseph. 1939. Order and Life. The Terry Lectures, Yale. Cambridge University Press.

  • Orgel, Leslie E. 1999. “Are you Serious, Dr. Mitchell?” Nature 402: 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Rudolph. 1939. “Proteins and Cell-organisation.” Joseph Needham and David E. Green(eds.), Perspectives in Biochemistry. Cambridge University Press.

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1962. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

  • Polkinghorne, John. 1994. Science and Christian Belief. London: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebble, John. 1996. “Successful Theory Development in Biology. A Consideration of the Theories of Oxidative Phosphorylation proposed by Davies & Krebs, Williams, and Mitchell.” Bioscience Reports 16: 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ––1999. “What makes biochemical Heroes?” The Biochemist 21 (Aug. 1999): 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Robert N. 1960. “Ion Transport and Respiration.” Biological Reviews 35: 231–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Joseph D. 1997. Moving Questions. A History of Membrane Transport and Bioenergetics. Oxford University Press.

  • Saier, Milton H. 1997, “Peter Mitchell and his Chemiosmotic Theories.” American Society for Microbiology News 63: 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, Erwin. 1944. What is Life? Cambridge University Press.

  • Scott, D. 1996. Michael Polanyi. London: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca, Lucius A. c.50. Epistvlae Morales 58: 22–23.

  • Slater, Edward Charles. (Bill) 1953. “Mechanism of Phosphorylation in the Respiratory Chain.” Nature 172: 975–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ––1994. Peter Dennis Mitchell. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 40: 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderqvist, Tom. 1996. “Existential Projects and Existential Choice in Science: Science Biography as an Edifying Genre.” Michael Shortland, and Richard Yeo (eds.), Telling Lives in Science. Essays in Scientific Biography. Cambridge University Press.

  • Thompson, D'Arcy, W. 1942. Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press.

  • Weber, Bruce H. 1986. “The Impact of the Prague Symposium on the Conceptual Development of Bioenergetics: a Retrospective View.” F. Alvarado and C.H. van Os (eds.), Ion Coupled Transport. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––1991. “Glynn and the Conceptual Development of the Chemiosmotic Theory: A Retrospective and Prospective View.” Bioscience Reports 11: 577–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, Eugene P. and Hodgkin, R.A. 1977. “Michael Polanyi.” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society 23: 412–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Robert Joseph Paton. 1999. “Heroes in Biochemistry?” The Biochemist 21 (Dec. 1999): 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, Joseph H. 1929. Biological Principles, a Critical Study. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, University of London, Egham, Royal Holloway, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK

    John N. Prebble

Authors
  1. John N. Prebble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prebble, J.N. The Philosophical Origins of Mitchell's Chemiosmotic Concepts. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 433–460 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012946715673

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012946715673

Search

Navigation