Skip to main content
Log in

An Empirical Test of a Cross-national Model of Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most models of corporate social responsibility revolve around the controversy as to whether business is a single dimensional entity of profit maximization or a multi-dimensional entity serving greater societal interests. Furthermore, the models are mostly descriptive in nature and are based on the experiences of western countries. There has been little attempt to develop a model that accounts for corporate social responsibility in diverse environments with differing socio-cultural and market settings. In this paper an attempt has been made to fill this gap by developing a two-dimensional model of corporate social responsibility and empirically testing its validity in the context of two dissimilar cultures – Australia and Bangladesh. The two dimensions are the span of corporate responsibility (narrow to wider perspective) and the range of outcomes of social commitments of businesses (cost to benefit driven perspective). The test results confirm the validity of the two-dimensional model in the two environments. The Factor analysis revealed two leading dimensions. Cluster analysis pointed to two distinctive clusters of managers in both Australia and Bangladesh, one consisting of managers with a broad contemporary concept of social responsibility, and the other with a limited narrow view. The paper concludes that corporate social responsibility is two-dimensional and universal in nature and that differing cultural and market settings in which managers operate may have little impact on the ethical perceptions of corporate managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, N. U., R. V. Montagno and R. J. Flenze: 1998, ‘Organizational Performance and Environmental Consciousness: An Empirical Study’, Management Decision 36, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abratt, R. and D. Sacks: 1988, ‘The Marketing Challenge: Towards Being Profitable and Socially Responsible’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 497–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., A. B. Carroll and J. D. Hatfield: 1983, ‘Instrument Development and Application in Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Proceedings(August), 369–373.

  • Bhat, R. and S. S. Bhat: 1997, ‘Incorporating Corporate Social Responsibility into the Strategic Marketing Planning Process’, Proceedings of the Australia and New Zealand Marketing Educators' Conference 2, 849–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhide, A. and H. H. Stevenson: 1990, ‘Why Be Honest If Honesty Does Not Pay’, Harvard Business Review(September-October), 121–129.

  • Buchholz, R. A.: 1990, Essentials of Public Policy for Management(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. and J. M. Logsdon: 1996, ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off’, Long Range Planning 29, 495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L., S. Grove and N. Kangun: 1993, ‘A Content Analysis of Environmental Advertising Claims: A Matrix Method Approach’, Journal of Advertising 22, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 4, 496–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, N. W.: 1973, The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility(Basic Books Inc., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J. and A. B. Carroll: 1984, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility-Reconciling Economic and Social Goals’, Sloan Management Journal(Winter), 59–64.

  • Darley, W. K. and D. M. Johnson: 1993, ‘Crossnational Comparison of Consumer Attitudes Toward Consumerism in four Developing Countries’, Journal of Consumer Affairs 27, 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFillipi, R. J.: 1982, ‘Conceptual Framework and Strategies for Corporate Social Involvement Research’, in L. E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy(JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut), No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1989, ‘Freedom and Philanthropy (An Interview)’, Business and Society Review 71(Fall), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profit’, The New York Times Magazine 13, 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1968, ‘The Methodology of Positive Economics’, Reprinted in Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Science(McMillan Publishing Co. Inc., New York).

  • Freeman, P. K.: 1994, ‘Integrating Environmental Risk into Corporate Strategy’, Risk Management 41, 54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. F.: 1985, ‘“Dangerous Territory”: The Societal Marketing Revisited’, Business Horizon 28, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildia, R. L.: 1995, ‘Consumer Survey Confirms Corporate Social Responsibility affects Buying Decisions’, Public Relations Quarterly 39, 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. F.: 1979, ‘The Conflict Between Private and Social Responsibility’, Akron Business Economy Review 10, 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C. L. and E. R. Stanford: 1997, ‘Green Alliances; Building New Business with Environmental Groups’, Long Range Planning 30, 184–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, T. A.: 1995, ‘Does Pollution Prevention Pay’, Business and Society Review 94, 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1983: ‘An Integrating Framework for Research in Business and Society: A Step Toward the Elusive Paradigm?’, Academy of Management Review 8, 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. Q. Jr. and K. Hema: 1994, ‘An Empirical Investigation of the Scope of Firms' Enterprise Strategy’, Business and Society 33, 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiel, G.: 1998, ‘Research and Education: Marketing in Future’, Australasian Marketing Journal 6, 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. F.: 1985, Business and Society(S. Chand and Company Ltd., New Delhi, India).

    Google Scholar 

  • Labatt, S.: 1997, ‘Corporate Response to Environmental Issues: Packaging’, Growth and Change 28(1), 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. J.: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility and Economic Performance: An Empirical Examination Corporate Profiles’, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, United States International University, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A. and A. Menon: 1997, ‘Enviroprneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Marketing Strategy’, Journal of Marketing 61, 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M. and S. D. Hunt: 1994, ‘The Commitment Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 58(July), 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A.: 1997, ‘Environmental Pollution and Competitive Advantage; An Exploratory Study of U.S. Industrial Goods Manufacturers’, Academy of Management Proceedings, 411–415.

  • Moser, M. R.: 1986: ‘A Framework for Analysing Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, H. and W. P. Galle: 1997, ‘Green Purchasing strategies: Trends and Implications’, International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management(Summer), 10–17.

  • Nehrt, C.: 1996, ‘Timing and Intensity Effects of Environmental Investments’, Strategic Management Journal 75, 535–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M: 1994, SPSS Professional Statistics 6.1(SPSS Inc., Illinois, U.S.A.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orpen, C: 1987, ‘The Attitudes of United States and South African Managers to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostlund, L. E.: 1977, ‘Attitudes of Managers Towards Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review 19, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J., H. T. Suchard and D. Scott: 1997, ‘A Stakeholder Approach to Interacting with the External Environment’, Australia and New Zealand Marketing Educators Conference Proceedings 1, 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and Van der Linde: 1995, ‘Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate’, Harvard Business Review 73, 20–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. E.: 1978, Corporate Behavior and Change(Reston Publishing Company, Reston, Virginia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. E. and J. E. Post: 1975, Private Management and Public Policy(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. E.: 1978, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Policy: A Synthetic Framework for Research and Analysis’, in L. E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, No. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut), pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V. and P. A. Fouts: 1997, ‘A Resourse-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 40, 534–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quazi, A. M.: 1997, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Diverse Environments: A Comparative Study of Managerial Attitudes in Australia and Bangladesh’, Business & Professional Ethics Journal 16, 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quazi, A. M. and M. Cook: 1996, ‘Managerial Attitudes Towards Social Responsibility in Marketing: Evidence from the Australian Food and Textile Industries’, Journal of Economic and Social Policy 2, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quazi, A. M. and D. O'Brien: 1996, ‘An Empirical Test of a Two-Dimensional Model of Managerial Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility in Diverse Cultures’, paper presented at the ANZAM Conference, held at the University of Wollongong, December 4–7, 1996.

  • Quazi A. M.: 1994, ‘Social Responsibility, Consumerism and Corporate Behaviour: A Comparative Study of Managerial Attitudes and Marketing Action in Australia and Bangladesh’, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Marketing, University of New South Wales, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quazi, A. M.: 1993, ‘Cross-cultural Managerial Attitudes Towards Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation’, Proceedings of the Seventh New Zealand Marketing Educators' Conference(November, 1993), pp. 405–412.

  • Samli, A. C.: 1992, Social Responsibility in Marketing: A Proactive and Profitable Marketing Management(Quorum Books).

  • Spencer, B. A. and J. K. Butler: 1987, ‘Measuring the Relative Importance of Social Responsibility Components: A Decision Model Approach’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 573–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P.: 1990, ‘Corporations and the Environment: Greening or Preening?’, Business & Society Review(Fall, 1990).

  • Steiner, G. A. and J. F. Steiner: 1997, Business, Government and Society – A Managerial Perspective(McGraw-Hills, Inc., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Votaw, D.: 1973, ‘Genius Becomes Rare’, in D. Votaw and S. P. Sethi (eds.), The Corporate Dilemma: Traditional Values Versus Contemporary Problems(Prentice Hall).

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16, 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. and S. M. Graves: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18, 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G. and P. C. Burger: 1975, Marketing Researc: Fundamentals and Dynamics(The Dryden Press, Illinois).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, M., S. Yamin and F. Wong: 1996,’ Environmental Consumerism and Buying Preferance for Green Products’, Proceedings of the Australian Marketing Educators' Conference, 613–626.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quazi, A.M., O'Brien, D. An Empirical Test of a Cross-national Model of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 25, 33–51 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006305111122

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006305111122

Navigation