Skip to main content
Log in

Because mere calculating isn't thinking

Comments on Hauser's “Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?”

Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Crimmins, Mark (1989), ‘Having Ideas and Having the Concept’,Mind and Language 4, pp. 280–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, Fred (1985), ‘Machines and the Mental’,Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59, pp. 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry (1983),The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, Mary and Rapaport, William J. (eds.) (1991), ‘Where DoesI Come From? Subjectivity and the Debate over Computational Cognitive Science’,Technical Report No.91-01, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Center for Cognitive Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Larry (1993), ‘Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?,’Minds and Machines 3, pp. 3–10 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Anthony (1968),Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, Douglas B. and Feigenbaum, Edward A. (1991), ‘On the Thresholds of Knowledge’,Artificial Intelligence 47, pp. 185–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, J. Christopher (1987), ‘The Right Stuff’,Synthese 70, pp. 349–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotty, Michael and Ledgard, Henry (1986),Programming Language Landscape: Syntax, Semantics, and Implementation, 2nd edition, Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Jean-Arcady and Wilson, Stewart W. (eds.) (1991),From Animals to Animats;Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Zenon (1985),Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science, 2nd edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, William J. (1988), ‘Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural-Language Understanding’, in J.H. Fetzer (ed.),Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 81–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, William J. (1990a), ‘Computer Processes and Virtual Persons: Comments on Cole's “Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity”’,Technical Report 90-13, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Dept. of Computer Science, May 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, William J. (1990b), ‘Cognitive Science’, in A. Ralston and E. D. Reilly (eds.),Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering, 3rd edition, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, forthcoming; longer version pre-printed asTechnical Report 90-12, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Dept. of Computer Science, May 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand (1950),History of Western Philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R. (1980), ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 417–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Brian Cantwell (1991), ‘The Owl and the Electric Encyclopedia’,Artificial Intelligence 47, pp. 251–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen P. (1983),From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case against Belief, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rapaport, W.J. Because mere calculating isn't thinking. Mind Mach 3, 11–20 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974302

Keywords

Navigation