William J. Rapaport
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
This essay continues my investigation of `syntactic semantics': the theory that, pace Searle's Chinese-Room Argument, syntax does suffice for semantics (in particular, for the semantics needed for a computational cognitive theory of natural-language understanding). Here, I argue that syntactic semantics (which is internal and first-person) is what has been called a conceptual-role semantics: The meaning of any expression is the role that it plays in the complete system of expressions. Such a `narrow', conceptual-role semantics is the appropriate sort of semantics to account (from an `internal', or first-person perspective) for how a cognitive agent understands language. Some have argued for the primacy of external, or `wide', semantics, while others have argued for a two-factor analysis. But, although two factors can be specified–-one internal and first-person, the other only specifiable in an external, third-person way–-only the internal, first-person one is needed for understanding how someone understands. A truth-conditional semantics can still be provided, but only from a third-person perspective.
- Allaire, Edwin B. (1963), 'Bare Particulars', Philosophical Studies 14; reprinted in Michael J. Loux (1970), ed., Universals and Particulars, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, pp. 235-244.Google Scholar
- Allaire, Edwin B. (1965), 'Another Look at Bare Particulars', Philosophical Studies 16; reprinted in Michael J. Loux (1970), ed., Universals and Particulars, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, pp. 250-257.Google Scholar
- Allen, James F. and Perrault, C. Raymond (1980), 'Analyzing Intentions in Utterance', Artificial Intelligence 15, pp. 143-178; reprinted in Barbara J. Grosz, Karen Sparck Jones and Bonnie L. Webber (1986), eds., Readings in Natural Language Processing, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 441-458. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Apostel, Leo (1961), 'Towards the Formal Study of Models in the Non-Formal Sciences', in Hans Freudenthal, ed., The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, pp. 1-37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brachman, Ronald J. and Schmolze, James G. (1985), 'An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System', Cognitive Science 9, pp. 171-216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baker, Robert (1967), 'Particulars: Bare, Naked, and Nude', Noûs 1, pp. 211-212.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruce, Bertram C. (1975), 'Generation as a Social Action', Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing-1, Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 64-67; reprinted in Barbara J. Grosz, Karen Sparck Jones and Bonnie L. Webber (1986), eds., Readings in Natural Language Processing, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 419-422. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruner, Jerome (1983), Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Carnap, Rudolf (1928), The Logical Structure of the World, Rolf A. George (trans.), Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
- Carroll, Lewis (1895), 'What the Tortoise Said to Achilles', Mind 4, pp. 278-280; reprinted in Mind 104, pp. 691-693, and in William Warren Bartley, III (1997), ed., Lewis Carroll's Symbolic Logic, New York: Clarkson N. Potter, pp. 431-434. See also commentary, pp. 466-475.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Castaneda, Hector-Neri (1979), 'Fiction and Reality: Their Fundamental Connections; An Essay on the Ontology of Total Experience', Poetics 8, pp. 31-62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Castaneda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language, and Experience, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Cho, Kah-Kyung (1992), 'Re-thinking Intentionality' (in Japanese), in Y. Nitta, ed., Tasha-no Genshogaku (Phenomenology of the Other), Hokuto Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Cohen, Philip R. and Levesque, Hector J. (1985), 'Speech Acts and Rationality', Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (University of Chicago), Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 49-60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cohen, Philip R. and Levesque, Hector J. (1990), 'Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication', in Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan and Martha E. Pollack, eds., Intentions in Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 221-256.Google Scholar
- Cohen, Philip R. and Perrault, C. Raymond (1979), 'Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts', Cognitive Science 3, pp. 177-212; reprinted in Barbara J. Grosz, Karen Sparck Jones, and Bonnie L. Webber (1986), eds., Readings in Natural Language Processing, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 423-440. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dennett, Daniel C. (1982), 'Beyond Belief', in Andrew Woodfield, ed., Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. xvi-95.Google Scholar
- Ehrlich, Karen (1995), 'Automatic Vocabulary Expansion through Narrative Context', Technical Report 95-09, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ehrlich, Karen and Rapaport, William J. (1997), 'A Computational Theory of Vocabulary Expansion', Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Stanford University), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 205-210; ¿http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/Papers/vocab.cogsci.tr.ps¿Google Scholar
- Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest (1991), 'Why Meaning (Probably) Isn't Conceptual Role', Mind and Language 6, pp. 328-343.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest (1992), Holism: A Shopper's Guide, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Galbraith, Mary (1995), 'Deictic Shift Theory and the Poetics of Involvement in Narrative', in Judith F. Duchan, Gail A. Bruder and Lynne E. Hewitt, eds., Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 19-59.Google Scholar
- Grosz, Barbara J. and Sidner, Candace L. (1986), 'Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse', Computational Linguistics 12, pp. 175-204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haller, Susan M. (1993a), 'Planning for Intentions with Rhetorical Relations', Proceedings of a Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (Ohio State University), Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 23-26.Google Scholar
- Haller, Susan M. (1993b), 'Collaboration in an Interactive Model of Plan Explanation', Proceedings of a AAAI Fall Symposium on Human-Computer Collaboration: Reconciling Theory, Synthesizing Practice, Technical Report FS93-05, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.Google Scholar
- Haller, Susan M. (1994), 'Interactive Generation of Plan Descriptions and Justifications', Technical Report 94-40, Buffalo, NY: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Haller, Susan M. (1995), 'Planning Text for Interactive Plan Explanations', in E. A. Yfantis, ed., Intelligent Systems: 3rd Golden West International Conference, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 61-67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hardt, Shoshana L. (1992), 'Conceptual Dependency', in Stuart C. Shapiro, ed., Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, 2nd edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 259-265.Google Scholar
- Harman, Gilbert (1974), 'Meaning and Semantics', in Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger, eds., Semantics and Philosophy, New York: New York University Press, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar
- Harman, Gilbert (1975), 'Language, Thought, and Communication', in Keith Gunderson, ed., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science; Vol. 7: Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 270-298.Google Scholar
- Harman, Gilbert (1982), 'Conceptual Role Semantics', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23, pp. 242-256.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harman, Gilbert (1987), '(Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics', in Ernest Lepore, ed., New Directions in Semantics, London: Academic Press, pp. 55-81.Google Scholar
- Harman, Gilbert (1988), 'Wide Functionalism', in Stephen Schiffer and Susan Steele, eds., Cognition and Representation, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 11-18.Google Scholar
- Harnad, Stevan (1990), 'The Symbol Grounding Problem', Physica D 42, pp. 335-346. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hill, Robin K. (1994), 'Issues of Semantics in a Semantic-Network Representation of Belief', Technical Report 94-11, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Hill, Robin K. (1995), 'Non-Well-Founded Set Theory and the Circular Semantics of Semantic Networks', in E. A. Yfantis, ed., Intelligent Systems: 3rd Golden West International Conference, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 375-386.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennings, Richard C. (1985), 'Translation, Interpretation and Understanding', paper read at the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division (Washington, DC); abstract, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59, pp. 345-346.Google Scholar
- Kamp, Hans (1984), 'A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation', in J. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen and M. Stokhof, eds., Truth, Interpretation, and Information, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 1-41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kamp, Hans and Reyle, Uwe (1993), From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Knight, Kevin (1989), 'Unification: A Multidisciplinary Survey', ACM Computing Surveys 21, pp. 93-124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kumar, Deepak (1993a), 'A Unified Model of Acting and Inference', in Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. and Ralph H. Sprague, Jr., eds., Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. III: Decision Support Systems and Knowledge-Based Systems, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 483-492.Google Scholar
- Kumar, Deepak (1993b), 'An AI Architecture Based on Message Passing', in James Geller, ed., Proceedings of the 1993 AAAI Spring Symposium on Innovative Applications of Massively Parallel Architectures, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, pp. 127-131.Google Scholar
- Kumar, Deepak (1993c), 'Rational Engines for BDI Architectures', in Amy Lansky, ed., Proceedings of the 1993 AAAI Spring Symposium on Foundations of Automated Planning, MenloPark, CA: AAAI Press, pp. 78-82.Google Scholar
- Kumar, Deepak (1994), 'From Beliefs and Goals to Intentions and Actions: An Amalgamated Model of Acting and Inference', Technical Report 94-04, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Kumar, Deepak (1996), 'The SNePS BDI Architecture', Decision Support Systems 16, pp. 3-19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kumar, Deepak and Shapiro, Stuart C. (1993), 'Deductive Efficiency, Belief Revision, and Acting', Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5, pp. 167-177.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kumar, Deepak and Shapiro, Stuart C. (1995), 'The OK BDI Architecture', in E. A. Yfantis, ed., Intelligent Systems: 3rd Golden West International Conference, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 307-317.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lakoff, George (1987), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Landman, Fred (1986), 'Pegs and Alecs', in Joseph Y. Halpern, ed., Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 45-61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lenat, Douglas B. and Feigenbaum, Edward A. (1991), 'On the Thresholds of Knowledge', Artificial Intelligence 47, pp. 185-250. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lepore, Ernest and Loewer, Barry (1981), 'Translation Semantics', Synthese 48, pp. 121-133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewis, David (1972), 'General Semantics', in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, pp. 169-218.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewis, David (1975), 'Languages and Language', in Keith Gunderson, ed., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science; Vol. 7: Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3-35.Google Scholar
- Loar, Brian (1982), 'Conceptual Role and Truth-Conditions', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23, pp. 272-283.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Loewer, Barry (1982), 'The Role of 'Conceptual Role Semantics'', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23, pp. 305-315.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lourie, Richard (1992), 'Raskolnikov Says the Darndest Things', New York Times Book Review (26 April), p. 24.Google Scholar
- Lycan, William G. (1984) 'Logical Form in Natural Language', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lytinen, Steven L. (1992), 'Conceptual Dependency and Its Descendants', Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23, pp. 51-73; reprinted in Fritz Lehmann, ed., Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence (1992) Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 51-73. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maida, Anthony S. and Shapiro, Stuart C. (1982), 'Intensional Concepts in Propositional Semantic Networks', Cognitive Science 6, pp. 291-330; reprinted in Ronald J. Brachman and Hector J. Levesque (1985), eds., Readings in Knowledge Representation, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 169-189. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martins, João and Shapiro, Stuart C. (1988), 'A Model for Belief Revision', Artificial Intelligence 35, pp. 25-79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martins, João and Cravo, Maria R. (1991), 'How to Change Your Mind', Noûs 25, pp. 537-551.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meinong, Alexius (1904), 'Über Gegenstandstheorie', in Rudolf Haller (1971), ed., Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, Vol. II, Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1971, pp. 481- 535; English translation ('The Theory of Objects') by Isaac Levi et al., in Roderick M. Chisholm, ed., Realism and the Background of Phenomenology New York: Free Press, pp. 76-117.Google Scholar
- Moore, G. E. (1939), 'Proof of an External World', reprinted in G. E. Moore (1962), Philosophical Papers, New York: Collier Books, pp. 126-148.Google Scholar
- Morris, Charles (1938), Foundations of the Theory of Signs, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Parsons, Terence (1975), 'A Meinongian Analysis of Fictional Objects', Grazer Philosophische Studien 1, pp. 73-86.Google Scholar
- Pavel, Thomas G. (1986), Fictional Worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Pelletier, Jeff (1994a), 'The Principle of Semantic Compositionality', Topoi 13, pp. 11-24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pelletier, Jeff (1994b), 'Semantic Compositionality: The Argument from Synonymy', in Roberto Casati, Barry Smith and G. White, eds., Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences, Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, pp. 311-317.Google Scholar
- Pelletier, Jeff (1994c), 'On an Argument against Semantic Compositionality', in Dag Prawitz and D. Westerstahl, eds., Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer, pp. 599-610.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Perlis, Donald (1991), 'Putting One's Foot in One's Head--Part I: Why', Noûs 25, pp. 435-455.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Perlis, Donald (1994), 'Putting One's Foot in One's Head--Part II: How', in Eric Dietrich, ed., Thinking Computers and Virtual Persons: Essays on the Intentionality of Machines, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 197-224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Potts, Timothy C. (1973), 'Model Theory and Linguistics', in Edward L. Keenan (1975), ed., Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241-250.Google Scholar
- Quillian, M. Ross (1967), 'Word Concepts: A Theory and Simulation of Some Basic Semantic Capabilities', Behavioral Science 12, pp. 410-430; reprinted in Ronald J. Brachman and Hector J. Levesque (1985), eds., Readings in Knowledge Representation, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 97-118. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Quillian, M. Ross (1968), 'Semantic Memory', in Marvin Minsky, ed., Semantic Information Processing, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 227-270.Google Scholar
- Quine, Willard Van Orman (1951), 'Two Dogmas of Empiricism', reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, 2nd Edition, Revised, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980, pp. 20-46.Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (1976), Intentionality and the Structure of Existence, Ph.D. dissertation, Bloomington: Indiana University, Department of Philosophy.Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (1978), 'Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox', Noûs 12, pp. 153- 180; errata, Noûs 13, pp. 125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rapaport, William J. (1981), 'How to Make the World Fit Our Language: An Essay in Meinongian Semantics', Grazer Philosophische Studien 14, pp. 1-21.Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (1985/1986), 'Non-Existent Objects and Epistemological Ontology', Grazer Philosophische Studien 25/26, pp. 61-95; reprinted in Rudolf Haller (1986), ed., Non-Existence and Predication, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rapaport, William J. (1986), 'Searle's Experiments with Thought', Philosophy of Science 53, pp. 271-279; preprinted as Technical Report 216, Buffalo, NY: SUNY Buffalo, Department of Computer Science, 1984.Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (1988), 'Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural-Language Understanding', in James H. Fetzer, ed., Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 81-131; reprinted (with numerous errors) in Eric Dietrich (1994), ed., Thinking Computers and Virtual Persons: Essays on the Intentionality of Machines, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 225-273. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rapaport, William J. (1991a), 'Predication, Fiction, and Artificial Intelligence', Topoi 10, pp. 79- 111; pre-printed as Technical Report 90-11, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo, Department of Computer Science, May 1990.Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (1991b), 'Meinong, Alexius I: Meinongian Semantics', in Hans Burkhardt and Barry Smith, eds., Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology, Munich: Philosophia Verlag, pp. 516-519.Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (1995), 'Understanding Understanding: Syntactic Semantics and Computational Cognition', in James E. Tomberlin, ed., AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology, Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 9, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, pp. 49-88; reprinted in Andy Clark and Josefa Toribio (1998), eds., Language and Meaning in Cognitive Science: Cognitive Issues and Semantic Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Conceptual Issues, Vol. 4, Hamden, CT: Garland.Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (1996), Understanding Understanding: Semantics, Computation, and Cognition, Technical Report 96-26, Buffalo, NY: SUNY Buffalo, Department of Computer Science; available on line at either: ¿ftp://ftp.cse.buffalo.edu/pub/tech-reports/96-26.ps.Z¿ or ¿http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/Papers/book.ps¿Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (1999), 'Implementation Is Semantic Interpretation', The Monist 82, pp. 109-130; longer version preprinted as Technical Report 97-15, Buffalo, NY: SUNY Buffalo, Department of Computer Science, and Technical Report 97-5, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo, Center for Cognitive Science: ¿http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/Papers/implementation.pdf¿Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (2000a), 'Cognitive Science', in Anthony Ralston, Edwin D. Reilly and David Hemmendinger, eds., Encyclopedia of Computer Science, 4th edition, London: Macmillan Reference; see also William J. Rapaport, 'Cognitive Science', in Anthony Ralston and Edwin D. Reilly, eds., Encyclopedia of Computer Science, 3rd edition, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993, pp. 185-189.Google Scholar
- Rapaport, William J. (2000b), 'How to Pass a Turing Test: Syntactic Semantics, Natural-Language Understanding, and First-Person Cognition', Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 9, pp. 467-490. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rapaport, William J. and Ehrlich, Karen (2000), 'A Computational Theory of Vocabulary Acquisition', in ¿ucja Iwanska and Stuart C. Shapiro, eds., Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language, Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press, pp. 347-375. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rapaport, William J. and Shapiro, Stuart C. (1995), 'Cognition and Fiction', in Judith F. Duchan, Gail A. Bruder and Lynne E. Hewitt, eds., Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; portions reprinted as 'Cognition and Fiction: An Introduction', in Ashwin Ram and Kenneth Moorman (1999), eds., Understanding Language Understanding: Computational Models of Reading, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 11-25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rapaport, William J., Shapiro, Stuart C. and Wiebe, Janyce M. (1997), 'Quasi-Indexicals and Knowledge Reports', Cognitive Science 21, pp. 63-107; reprinted in Francesco Orilia and William J. Rapaport (1998), eds., Thought, Language, and Ontology: Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castañeda, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 235-294.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Récanati, François (1995), 'The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation', Cognitive Science 19, pp. 207-232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Renfrew, Colin (1990), 'Towards a Cognitive Archeology', in "For Participants in the Workshop for an Explicitly Scientific Cognitive Archeology", unpublished ms., Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Department of Archeology, 8-13 April 1990.Google Scholar
- Roberts, Lawrence D. and Rapaport, William J. (1988), 'Quantifier Order, Reflexive Pronouns, and Quasi-Indexicals', Technical Report 88-16, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo, Department of Computer Science, August 1988.Google Scholar
- Russell, Bertrand (1918), 'The Philosophy of Logical Atomism', reprinted in Bertrand Russell, Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901-1950, R. C. Marsh (1956), ed., New York: Capricorn, pp. 177-281.Google Scholar
- Ryle, Gilbert (1949), The Concept of Mind, New York: Barnes & Noble University Books.Google Scholar
- Schank, Roger C. and Rieger, Charles J. (1974), 'Inference and the Computer Understanding of Natural Language', Artificial Intelligence 5, pp. 373-412.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schank, Roger C. and Riesbeck, Christopher K., eds. (1981), Inside Computer Understanding: Five Programs Plus Miniatures, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Segal, Erwin M. (1995), 'Narrative Comprehension and the Role of Deictic Shift Theory' in Judith F. Duchan, Gail A. Bruder and Lynne E. Hewitt, eds., Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3-17.Google Scholar
- Sellars, Wilfrid (1963), Science, Perception and Reality, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Searle, John R. (1979), 'The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse', in Expression and Meaning, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58-75.Google Scholar
- Searle, John R. (1980), 'Minds, Brains, and Programs,' Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 417- 457.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shapiro, Stuart C. (1979), 'The SNePS Semantic Network Processing System', in Nicholas Findler, ed., Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers, New York: Academic Press, pp. 179-203.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, Stuart C. (1993), 'Belief Spaces as Sets of Propositions', Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5, pp. 225-235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shapiro, Stuart C. and Rapaport, William J. (1987), 'SNePS Considered as a Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network', in Nick Cercone & Gordon McCalla, eds., The Knowledge Frontier: Essays in the Representation of Knowledge, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 262-315; earlier version preprinted as Technical Report 85-15, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, 1985; shorter version appeared in Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI-86, Philadelphia, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 278- 283; revised version of the shorter version appears as "A Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network", in Leslie Burkholder, ed., Philosophy and the Computer, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992, pp. 75-91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shapiro, Stuart C. and Rapaport, William J. (1991), 'Models and Minds: Knowledge Representation for Natural-Language Competence', in Robert Cummins and John Pollock, eds., Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 215-259.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, Stuart C. and Rapaport, William J. (1992), 'The SNePS Family', Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23, pp. 243-275; reprinted in Fritz Lehmann (1992), ed., Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 243-275.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shapiro, Stuart C. and Rapaport, William J. (1995), 'An Introduction to a Computational Reader of Narrative', in Judith F. Duchan, Gail A. Bruder and Lynne E. Hewitt, eds., Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 79-105.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, Stuart C., Rapaport, William J., Cho, Sung-Hye, Choi, Joongmin, Feit, Elissa, Haller, Susan, Kankiewicz, Jason and Kumar, Deepak (1996), 'A Dictionary of SNePS Case Frames', ¿http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/sneps/Manuals/dictionary.ps¿Google Scholar
- Smith, Brian Cantwell (1985), 'Limits of Correctness in Computers,' in Charles Dunlop and Rob Kling (1991), eds., Computerization and Controversy, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 632- 646. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, Brian Cantwell (1987), 'The Correspondence Continuum', Report CSLI-87-71, Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
- Smith, Brian Cantwell (1991), 'The Owl and the Electric Encyclopedia', Artificial Intelligence 47, pp. 251-288. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sowa, John F. (1984), Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sowa, John F. (1992), 'Conceptual Graphs as a Universal Knowledge Representation', Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23, pp. 75-93; reprinted in Fritz Lehmann (1992), ed., Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 75-93. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stich, Stephen (1983), From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Weizenbaum, Joseph (1976), Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation, New York: W. H. Freeman. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wills, Gary (1991), 'Man of the Year', New York Review of Books (21 November 1991) 12, pp. 14-18.Google Scholar
- Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1970), 'Bergmann's Constituent Ontology', Noûs 4, pp. 109-134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woods, William A. (1975), 'What's in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks', in Daniel G. Bobrow and Alan M. Collins (1985), eds., Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, New York: Academic Press, pp. 35-82; reprinted in Ronald J. Brachman and Hector J. Levesque, eds., Readings in Knowledge Representation, Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 217-241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Woods, William A. and Schmolze, James G. (1992), 'The KL-ONE Family', Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23, pp. 133-177; reprinted in Fritz Lehmann (1992), ed., Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 133-177. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wyatt, Richard (1989), 'The Representation of Opaque Contexts', Technical Report 89-13 (1992) Buffalo, NY: SUNY Buffalo, Department of Computer Science.Google Scholar
- Wyatt, Richard (1990), 'Kinds of Opacity and Their Representations', in Deepak Kumar, ed., Current Trends in SNePS--Semantic Network Processing System, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 437, Berlin: Springer, pp. 123-144. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wyatt, Richard (1993), 'Reference and Intensions', Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5, pp. 263-271.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zadrozny, Wlodek (1994), 'From Compositional to Systematic Semantics', Linguistics and Philosophy 17, pp. 329-342.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Holism, Conceptual-Role Semantics, and Syntactic Semantics
Recommendations
Conceptual semantics
The basic provisions of conceptual semantics that were proposed by the well-known linguist S. Pinker are discussed in this paper. As well as other concepts of cognitive semantics, this concept emphasizes the fundamental role of human physical in the ...
Deriving Pretty-Big-Step Semantics from Small-Step Semantics
Proceedings of the 23rd European Symposium on Programming Languages and Systems - Volume 8410Big-step semantics for languages with abrupt termination and/or divergence suffer from a serious duplication problem, addressed by the novel 'pretty-big-step' style presented by Charguéraud at ESOP'13. Such rules are less concise than corresponding ...
Comments