Skip to main content
Log in

A Kantian Stance on the Intentional Stance

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I examine the way in which Daniel Dennett (1987, 1995) uses his 'intentional'and 'design' stances to make the claim that intentionality is derived fromdesign. I suggest that Dennett is best understood as attempting to supplyan objective, nonintentional, naturalistic rationale for our use of intentionalconcepts. However, I demonstrate that his overall picture presupposesprior application of the intentional stance in a preconditional, ineliminable,'sense-giving' role. Construed as such, Dennett's account is almostidentical to the account of biological teleology offered by Kant in TheCritique of Judgement, with the consequence that Dennett's naturalism isuntenable. My conclusions lead to doubts concerning the legitimacy of anyaccount attempting to naturalise intentionality by extracting normativityfrom biology and also point to a novel account of biological function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akins, K. (ed.): 1996, Perception: Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Volume V, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson, R. and Lauder, G.V.: 1994, 'Function Without Purpose: The Uses of Causal Role Function in Evolutionary Biology', Biology and Philosophy 9, 443–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds): 1996, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, M.: 1991, 'Can Biological Teleology Be Naturalized?' Journal of Philosophy 88, 647–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D.J.: 1998, 'Etiological Theories of Function: A Geographical Survey', Biology and Philosophy 13, 505–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1975, 'Functional Analysis', Journal of Philosophy 72, 741–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlborn, B. (ed.): 1993, Dennett and His Critics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1971, 'Intentional Systems', Journal of Philosophy 8, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1978, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays in Mind and Psychology, Bradford Books, Montgomery VT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1981, 'True Believers: The Intentional Strategy and Why it Works', in Heath (ed.), Scientific Explanation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1981, 'Three Kinds of Intentional Psychology', in Healy (ed.), Reduction, Time and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1983, 'Intentional Systems in Cognitive Ethology: The 'Panglossian Paradigm' Defended', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6, 343–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1987, The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1991a, Consciousness Explained, The Penguin Press, Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1991b, 'Real Patterns', Journal of Philosophy 87, 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1995, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, The Penguin Press, Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1996, Kinds of Minds, Wiedenfeld & Nicholson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1998, Brainchildren: Essays On Designing Minds, Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1995, Naturalizing The Mind, MIT Press/A Bradford Book, Cambridge MA/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1996, 'Deconstructing Dennett's Darwin', Mind and Langage 11, 246–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1998, In Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge MA/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: 1993, 'Functions: Consensus Without Unity', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74, 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and Vrba, E.S.: 1982, Exaptation-A Missing Term in The Science of Form, Paleobiology 8, 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1993, 'Pattern and Being', in Dahlbom (ed.), Dennett and his Critics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1994, 'Understanding: Dennet and Searle', in Revonsuo and Kamppinen (eds), Consciousness in Philosophy and Cognitive Neurosicence, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1996, 'Objective Perception', in Akins (ed.), Perception: Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Scicence, Vol. V, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J.: 1998, Having Thought: Esssays in The Metaphysics of Mind, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, R. (ed.): 1981 Reduction, Time and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A.F. (ed.): 1981 Scientific Explanation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time (translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson), Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1982, The Basic Problems of Phenomenology (translation and introduction by A. Hofstadter), Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1960, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (translated by Dorion Cairns), Matinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1952, The Critique of Judgement (translated by J.C. Meredith), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1993, 'Function and Design', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18, 379–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1972, 'Naming and Necessity', in G. Harman and D. Davidson (eds), The Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R.: 1997, 'Biological Function, Selection and Reduction', British Journal for The Philosophy of Science 48, 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, J.D.: 1970, Kant's Concept of Teleology, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M.: 1962, Phenomenology of Perception (translated by C. Smith), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milikan, R.: 1984, Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milikan, R.: 1993, White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1974, 'What Is It Like To Be a Bat?', Philosophical Review 83, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1979, Mortal Questions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1986, The View From Nowhere, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1995, Other Minds: Critical Essays 1969–1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: 1991, 'Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense', Philosophy of Science 58, 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D.: 1987, Reality and Representation, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D.: 1993, Philosophical Naturalism, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Paper II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M.J.: 2000, 'The Function of Function'. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31, 113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M.J.:unpublished, 'Evolution and Belief: The Missing Question'.

  • Revonsuo, A. & Kamppinen, M. (eds): 1994, Consciousness in Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R.: 1983, Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ratcliffe, M. A Kantian Stance on the Intentional Stance. Biology & Philosophy 16, 29–52 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006710821443

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006710821443

Navigation