Abstract
Discoveries in physics imply two elements. The firstone is the belief that formal tools, already foundedin the framework of existing mathematical theories,may offer the solution to a puzzling anomaly. Thesecond one is the ability to assign a physical meaningto the adopted formalism, and to consider all itstheoretical implications.
Discussing an historical case where the adoption of aparticular formalism represents the real motor of thecreative intuition, we mean to delineate scientificdiscovery both as a discontinuous change with respectto previous achievements and as a linear process ofknowledge enrichment.
On March 1948, during the Pocono conference thatfollowed the one held in Shelter Island, Feynmananalysed the electron-photon interaction formulatingit in terms of the Lagrangian formalism. Thedevelopment of Feynman's idea draws attention to thepoint that novel theoretical discoveries may be theresult of applying existing formal tools. They may bethe result of giving different interpretations toprevious scientific thinking (according to thehermeneutical point that not even scientific textshave a single, absolute meaning but are given amultiplicity of possible readings by different peoplein different contexts).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
M. Born: 1926, Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 37: 863-867.
P.A.M. Dirac: 1931, Quantized Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field. Proceeding of the Royal Society, London A133: 60-72.
R.P. Feynman: 1948, Space-Time Approach to Non-relativistic Quantum Electrodynamics. Review of Modern Physics 20(2): 367-387.
R.P. Feynman and A.R. Hibbs: 1965, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. McGraw-Hill, New York.
R.P. Feynman: 1966, The Development of the Space-Time View of Quantum Electrodynamics. Science 153: 699-708.
R.P. Feynman: 1985, QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
H.G. Gadamer: 1960, Wahrheit und Methode. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.
T.S. Kuhn: 1962, 1970 Second Edition Enlarged, International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science 2, Vol. 2: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
J. Mehra: 1973, The Physicist's Conception of Nature. Reidel, Dordrecht.
T. Nickles (ed.): 1980, Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Reidel, Dordrecht.
D. Oldroyd: 1986, The Arch of Knowledge. An Introductory Study of the History of the Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Methuen, New York and London.
J.R. Oppenheimer: 1953, Science and the Common Understanding. Simon and Schuster, New York.
K.R. Popper: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London.
S.S. Schweber: 1994, QED and the Men Who Made It: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
J. Schwinger (ed.): 1958, Selected Papers on Quantum Electrodynamics. Dover, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rebaglia, A. Scientific Discovery: Between Incommensurability of Paradigms and Historical Continuity. Foundations of Science 4, 337–355 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009696428623
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009696428623