Skip to main content
Log in

Shelter for the Cognitively Homeless

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main strands of the Cartesian tradition is the view that the mental realm is cognitively accessible to us in a special way: whenever one is in a mental state of a certain sort, one can know it just by considering the matter. In that sense, the mental realm is thought to be a cognitive home for us, and the mental states it comprises are luminous. Recently, however, Timothy Williamson has argued that we are cognitively homeless: no mental state is in fact luminous. But his argument depends on an excessively strong account of luminosity. I formulate a weaker conception of luminosity that is unaffected by Williamson’s argument and yet is substantial enough to satisfy those who wish to retain this part of the Cartesian tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • T. Williamson (1996) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Homelessness’ The Journal of Philosophy 93 IssueID11 554–573

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Williamson (2000) Knowledge and its Limits Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baron Reed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, B. Shelter for the Cognitively Homeless. Synthese 148, 303–308 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6224-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6224-4

Keywords

Navigation