Abstract
Interference in picture naming by task-irrelevant words in Stroop-like paradigms has been interpreted as evidence of automatic semantic processing of unattended words. However, this effect may have been due to attentional rather than automatic processing. To test this hypothesis, subjects were instructed either to ignore task-irrelevant words (selective attention) or to attend to them (divided attention). Three separate dependent measures (interference in picture naming, recognition memory, and confidence ratings) provided converging evidence about subjects’ attentional strategies. It was predicted that semantic interference would occur in the divided attention condition, but not when subjects attended selectively to the picture and ignored the word. Contrary to predictions, semantic interference occurred in both instruction conditions. Implications for future research on automaticity are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1969, 80, (3, Pt. 2).
Duncan, J. The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 1980, 87, 272–300.
Ehri, L. C. Do adjectives and functors interfere as much as nouns in naming pictures? Child Development, 1977, 48, 697–701.
Golinkoff, R. M., & Rosinski, R. R. Decoding, semantic processing, and reading comprehension skill. Child Development, 1976, 47, 252–258.
Guttentag, R. E., & Haith, M. M. A developmental study of automatic word processing in a picture classification task. Child Development, 1979, 50, 894–896.
Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. Toward a theory of automatic processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 1974, 6, 293–323.
Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. Visual-feature and response components in a picture-word interference task with beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977, 24, 440–460.
Posner, M. I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1980, 32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Rayner, K., & Posnansky, C. J. Stages of processing in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1978, 107, 64–80.
Regan, J. E., Automaticity and learning: Effects of familiarity on naming letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981, 7, 180–195.
Rosinski, R. R. Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 1977, 48, 643–647.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 127–190.
Smith, M. C., & Magee, L. E. Tracing the time course of pictureword processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1980, 109, 373–392.
Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, 643–662.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NIMH National Research Service Award 5T32 MH15755 to Michael B. Reiner, NIMH Research Scientist Development Award MH00226, the Clifford E. Lee Foundation, and an NSERC grant to Frederick J. Morrison. The authors thank Judy List, Frank Manis, Kevin Miller, and David Mitchell for comments on an earlier draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reiner, M.B., Morrison, F.J. Is semantic interference really automatic?. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 21, 271–274 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334707
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334707