Skip to main content
Log in

A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay reviews six different approaches to intellectual property. It and argues that none of these accounts provide an adequate justification of intellectual property laws and policies because (1) there are many different types of intellectual property, and (2) a variety of incommensurable values play a role in the justification of intellectual property. The best approach to intellectual property is to assess and balance competing moral values in light of the particular facts and circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, L. and D. Nelkin: 2001, Body Bazaar (Crown Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, S.: 1972, Hegel's Theory of the Modern State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, J.: 1994, 'The Economy of Ideas: A Framework for Rethinking Patents and Copyrights in the Digital Age', Wired Magazine 2(3), 1-5. Available at: www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/ economy.ideas.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. and J. Childress: 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black's Law Dictionary, 7th ed.: 1999 (West Publishing, St. Paul, MN).

  • Brody, B.: 1996, 'Public Goods and Fair Prices: Balancing Technological Innovation and Social Well Being', Hastings Center Report 26(2), 5-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahos, P.: 1996, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property (Aldershot, Dartmouth, NH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfuss, R.: 1989, 'General Overview of the Intellectual Property System', in V. Weil and J. Snapper (eds.), Owning Scientific and Technical Information (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ), pp. 17-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G.: 1988, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, J.: 2000, Law 101 (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, F. and R. Shook: 1993, Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks, 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M.: 1991, Rights Talk (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, R.: 1996, Body Parts: Property Rights and the Ownership of Human Biological Materials (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, H.: 1993, 'Privacy and Autonomy', in P. Smith (ed.), The Nature and Process of Law (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 708-714.

  • Gutmann, A. and D. Thompson: 1996, Democracy and Disagreement (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, R.: 2000, The Law of Corporations (West Publishing, St. Paul, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.: 1961, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, F.: 1976 [1821], The Philosophy of the Right, Knox, T. (trans.) (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettinger, E.: 1989, 'Justifying Intellectual Property', Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, 31-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honore, A.: 1977, 'Ownership', in P. Smith (ed.), The Nature and Process of Law (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 370-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuflik, A.: 1989, 'Moral Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights', in V. Weil and J. Snapper (eds.), Owning Scientific and Technical Information (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ), pp. 29-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFollette, M.: 1992, Stealing into Print (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J.: 1980 [1764], Second Treatise of Government (Hackett, Indianapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B.: 1995, 'Against Intellectual Property', Philosophy and Social Action 21(3), 7-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K.: 1974 [1844], Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts (Progress Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K.: 1996 [1867], Das Kapital (Regnery Publishing, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and F. Engels: 1998 [1848], The Communist Manifesto (Signet Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • May, C.: 1998, Thinking, Buying, Selling: Intellectual Property Rights in Political Economy', New Political Economy 3(1), 59-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merges, R.: 1996, 'Property Rights Theory and the Commons: the Case of Scientific Research', Social Philosophy and Policy 13, 145-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.: 1956 [1859] On Liberty (Liberal Arts Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.: 1979 [1861] Utilitarianism (Hackett, Indianapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. and M. Davis: 2000, Intellectual Property: Patents, Trademarks, and Copyright (West Publishing, St. Paul, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS): 2000, The Digital Dilemma (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D.: 1985, Science as Intellectual Property (MacMillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orentlicher, D.: 1997, 'Genetic Privacy in the Patient-Physician Relationship', in M. Rothstein (ed.), Genetic Secrets (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT), pp. 77-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L.: 1991, 'Trade Secrets and the Justification of Intellectual Property', Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, 247-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejovich, S.: 1996, 'Property Rights and Technological Innovation', Social Philosophy and Policy 13, 168-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, M.: 1993, Reinterpreting Property (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, M.: 1996, Contested Commodities (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1993, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 2000, Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D.: 2001a, 'DNA Patents and Scientific Discovery and Innovation: Assessing Benefits and Risks', Science and Engineering Ethics 7(1), 29-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D.: 2001b, 'DNA Patents and Human Dignity', The Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 29(2), 152-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D.: 2001c, 'Developing Drugs for the Developing World: an Economic, Legal, Moral, and Political Dilemma', Developing World Bioethics 1(1), 11-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W.: 1930, The Right and the Good (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.: 2000. 'Privacy as Intellectual Property?', Stanford Law Review 52, 1125-1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S.: 1988, Consequentialism and its Critics (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V.: 1996, Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge (South End Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Svatos, M.: 1996, 'Biotechnology and the Utilitarian Argument for Patents', Social Philosophy and Policy 13, 113-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Constitution: 1787, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8.

  • Waldron, J.: 1988, The Right to Private Property (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wreen, M.: 1998, 'Patents', in Chadwick, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Vol. 3 (Academic Press, New York), pp. 435-447.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Resnik, D.B. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 319–335 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631902384

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631902384

Navigation