Abstract
This note explains an error in Restall’s ‘Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and some of their rivals)’ (Restall, J Philos Logic 22(5):481–511, 1993) concerning the modelling conditions for the axioms of assertion A → ((A → B) → B) (there called c6) and permutation (A → (B → C)) → (B → (A → C)) (there called c7). We show that the modelling conditions for assertion and permutation proposed in ‘Simplified Semantics’ overgenerate. In fact, they overgenerate so badly that the proposed semantics for the relevant logic R validate the rule of disjunctive syllogism. The semantics provides for no models of R in which the “base point” is inconsistent. This problem is not restricted to ‘Simplified Semantics.’ The techniques of that paper are used in Graham Priest’s textbook An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic (Priest, 2001), which is in wide circulation: it is important to find a solution. In this article, we explain this result, diagnose the mistake in ‘Simplified Semantics’ and propose two different corrections.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Priest, G. (2001). An introduction to non-classical logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Restall, G. (1993). Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals). Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22(5), 481–511.
Routley, R. (1984). The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics. Studia Logica, 43(1–2), 131–158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Restall, G., Roy, T. On Permutation in Simplified Semantics. J Philos Logic 38, 333–341 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-009-9104-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-009-9104-z