Skip to main content
Log in

Pain as a Folk Psychological Concept: A Clinical Perspective

Brain and Mind

Abstract

This paper develops an instrumentalistic argumentagainst an eliminativist approach to using the folkconcept of pain in clinical medicine and draws someimplications for biomedical theories of pain. Thepaper argues that the folk concept of pain plays afundamental role in several aspects of clinicalmedicine, including the diagnosis and treatment ofdiseases and symptoms, relieving human suffering, andthe doctor-patient relationship. Since clinicians mustbe able to apply biomedical theories of pain inmedical practice, these theories should not stray toofar from pain's clinical realities. Biomedicaltheories of pain should at least incorporate an analogof the folk concept of pain, even if this concept isrevised in light of scientific advances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, D., Munson, R. and Resnik, D., 1988: Medical Reasoning, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickle, J., 1992: Revisionary physicalism, Biology and Philosophy 7(4), 411–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, G., 1993: Disease, Diagnosis, and Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, M. (ed.), 1997: Expert Pain Management, Springhouse, Springhouse, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, E., 1991: The Nature of Suffering, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. and Turner, D. (eds), 1993: Folk Psychology and the Philosophy of Mind, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S., 1986: Neurophilosophy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver, C. and Gert, B., 1982: Philosophy in Medicine, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupples, S., 1992: Pain as a hurtful experience: A philosophical analysis and implications for nursing care, Nursing Forum 27(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D., 1987: The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, R., 1991: The Rationality of Emotion, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B., 1980: The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A., 1986: Epistemology and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, D., 1995: Belief in pain, Consciousness and Cognition 4, 323–345.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, D., 1999: Pain, qualia, and the explanatory gap, Philosoph. Psychol. 11(3), 371–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardastle, V., 1997: When a pain is not, J. Philosophy 94(8), 381–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, V., 1999: The Myth of Pain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, J. and Redmond, K., 1998: Pain: Causes and Management, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and Woodward, J., 1985: Folk psychology is here to stay, Philosoph. Rev. 94, 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), 1986: Pain terms: A current list with definitions and notes on usage, Pain (Supplement) 3, 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquette, D., 1994: Philosophy of Mind, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P., 1994: The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., 1995: Humane Medicine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W., 1987: Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W., 1996: Philosophy of mind, in N. Bunnin and E. Tsui-James (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. and Thomasma, D., 1981: A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, G., 1976: Pain and unpleasantness, in S. Spicker and T. Englehardt (eds), Philosophical Dimensions of the Neuro-Medical Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D., 1995: To test or not to test: A clinical dilemma, Theoretical Medicine 16, 141–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A., 1995: Philosophy of Social Science, 2nd edn, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K., 1994: Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sox, H., Blatt, M., Higgins, M. and Marton, K., 1988: Medical Decision Making, Butterworths, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, H., 1992: What is empathy and can it be taught? Ann. Internal Medicine 116, 843–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., 1988: Computational Philosophy of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., 1993: Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, H., Pedersen, S. and Rosenberg, R., 1990: Philosophy of Medicine, 2nd edn, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Resnik, D.B. Pain as a Folk Psychological Concept: A Clinical Perspective. Brain and Mind 1, 193–207 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010027213464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010027213464

Navigation