Abstract
In this paper it is argued that much can be gained for the analysis and evaluation of arguing when fallacies are not, or not only, conceived of as flawed premise–conclusion complexes but rather as argumentative moves which distort harmfully an interaction aiming at resolving communication problems argumentatively. Starting from Normative Pragmatics and the pragma-dialectical concept of fallacy, a case study is presented to illustrate a fallacy which is termed the 'revelation argument' because it is characterized by an interactor's revealing her thoughts and/or emotions to the addressees and claiming that these would have justificatory or refutatory potential with respect to the problem discussed. Although the revelation argument may not be a paradigm case of resolution- hindering moves, it is an extreme case of flawed reasoning that illustrates plainly the advantages of a communicational perspective on arguing and fallacies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Albert, H.: 1968, Traktat über kritische Vernunft, Dritte, erweiterte Auflage, Mohr, Tübingen, 1975 [11968].
Deppermann, A.: 1996, Berufung auf geteiltes Wissen als Persuasionsstrategie im interaktiven Handeln, Paper 4 des Forschungsschwerpunkts 'Familien-, Jugend-und Kommunikationssoziologie' der J.W.-von-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. Mimeo.
van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris, Dordrecht (Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis 1).
van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1991, 'Les sophismes dans une perspective pragmatico-dialectique', in L'argumentation. Colloque de Cerisy-la-Salle, 22–29/08/1987. Textes édités par A. Lempereur, Mardaga, Liège (collection Philosophie et Langage), pp. 173–194.
van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1992a, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies, A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1992b, 'Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum ad Hominem', Argumentation 6, 141–159.
van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1995, 'The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Fallacies', in Hansen and Pinto (eds), pp. 130–144.
van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa (Studies on Rhetoric and Communication).
van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst and T. Kruiger: 1987, Handbook of Argumentation Theory, A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies, Foris, Dordrecht (Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis 7).
van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst, F. Snoeck Henkemans et al.: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Grice, H. P.: 1975, 'Logic and Conversation', in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York.
Haft-van Rees, M. A.: 1989, 'Conversation, Relevance, and Argumentation', Argumentation 3, 385–393.
Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.
Hansen, H. V. and R. C. Pinto (eds.): 1995, Fallacies, Classical and Contemporary Readings, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
Houtlosser, P.: 1995, Standpunten in een kritische discussie, Een pragma-dialectisch perspectief op de indentificatie en reconstructie van standpunten, IFOTT, Amsterdam (Studies in Language and Language Use 22).
Jackson, S.: 1983, 'The Arguer in Interpersonal Argument: Pros and Cons of Individual-level Analysis', in D. Zarefsky, M. O. Sillars and J. Rhodes (eds.), Argument in Transition, Proceedings of the Third Summer Conference on Argumentation, SCA, Annandale, VA.
Jackson, S.: 1995, 'Fallacies and Heuristics', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference; 4 vol., International Centre for the Study of Argumentation (SicSat), Amsterdam; vol. II, pp. 257–269.
Kienpointner, M.: 1992, Alltagslogik, Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstadt (problemata 126).
Kopperschmidt, J.: 1989, Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt (problemata 119).
Kruiger, T.: 1995, 'Die pragma-dialektische Analyse von Suppositionsargumenten', in H. Wohlrapp (Hg.), Wege der Argumentationsforschung, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstadt (problemata 135), pp. 230–247.
Lallemant, J.-P.: Entretiens de madame la prieure *** au sujet des affaires présentes par rapport à la religion. s.l., s.d. [1737]. Collegii S.J. Friburgiensis Brisgoviae, Freiburg, UB, N 4579.
Leff, M.: 1978, 'Boethius' De differentiis topicis, Book IV', in J. J. Murphy (ed), Medieval Eloquence, Studies in the Theory and Practice of Medieval Rhetoric, University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, pp. 3–24.
Locke, J.: 1975, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1690]. Edited with an Introduction, critical apparatus and glossary by Peter H. Nidditch, Clarendon, Oxford.
Næss, A.: 1975, Kommunikation und Argumentation, Eine Einführung in die angewandte Semantik. Aus dem Norwegischen übersetzt von Arnim von Stechow, Scriptor, Kronberg/Ts. (Scriptor TB, Serie Linguistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Nr. 59) [norweg. Original: En del elementœre logiske emner, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 111975 [11941]].
Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 31976, Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique, Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles [anciennement: Éditions de l'Institut de sociologie] [première publication: La nouvelle rhétorique, Presses universitaires de France, Paris, 1958].
Rühl, M.: 1997a, Argumentieren und Autorität, Untersuchungen zu argumentativer Sprachverwendung in asymmetrischen Kommunikationssituationen. Dissertation, Freiburg i.Br.
Rühl, M.: 1997b, Argument and Authority, On the Pragmatic Bases of Accepting an Appeal to Authority as Rational. Paper presented at the 'Argumentation and Rhetoric' Conference, held by the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation at St Catharines, ON, May 1997.
Ryan, E. E.: 1984, Aristotle's Theory of Rhetorical Argumentation, Bellarmin, Montreal.
Ryan, E. E.: 1993, 'L'argumentation rhétorique d'Aristote: séquence prédicative-interconceptuelle?', in C. Plantin (éd), Lieux communs, topoi, stéréotypes, clichés, Kimé, Paris (coll. Argumentation — Sciences du langage), pp. 464–479.
Schellens, P. J.: 1985, Redelijke Argumenten, Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers, Foris, Dordrecht.
Searle, J. R.: 1969, Speech Acts, An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambrige University Press, Cambridge (Engl.).
Snoeck Henkemans A. F.: 1992, Analysing Complex Argumentation, The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion, SicSat, Amsterdam (Amsterdamse Studies over Taalgebruik 2).
Toulmin, S. E.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Engl.).
Toulmin, S. E., R. Rieke and A. Janik: 1979, An Introduction to Reasoning, MacMillan, New York.
Walton, D. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue, Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, SUNY, New York.
Warnick, B.: 1997, Comparing Aristotle's and Perelman's Classification of Topoi, Lecture delivered at the University of Amsteram, 26/03/1997.
Warnick, B. and S. L. Kline: 1992, 'The New Rhetoric's Argument Schemes. A Rhetorical View of Practical Reasoning', Argumentation and Advocacy 29, 1–15.
Willard, C. A.: 1972, The Conception of the Auditor in Aristotle's Rhetorical Theory, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Willard, C. A.: 1983, Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rühl, M. The Revelation Argument. A 'Communicational Fallacy'. Argumentation 13, 73–96 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007770527609
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007770527609