Skip to main content
Log in

Information Asymmetry and Socially Responsible Investment

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 February 2010

Abstract

Selecting, applying and reporting on investment screens for socially responsible investing (SRI) presents challenges for companies, investors and fund managers. This article seeks to clarify the nature of these challenges in developing an understanding of the foundations of ethical investment screens. At a conceptual level this work argues that there is a common element to the ethical foundations of SRI, even with very different apparent motivations and investment restrictions. Establishing this commonality assists in explaining the information asymmetry problem inherent in SRI. A market-facilitated solution illustrates how these insights might foster the development of socially responsible investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SRI:

Socially responsible investment

EIRIS:

Ethical Investment Research Service

GRI:

Global Reporting Initiative

CAPM:

Capital Asset Pricing Model

SIF:

Social Investment Forum

CSR:

Corporate social responsibility

References

  • Angel, J.J. and Rivoli, P.: 1997 ‘Does Ethical Investing Impose a Cost Upon the Firm? A Theoretical Perspective’ Journal of Investing, 6(4): 57-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. Koedijk, K and Otten, R. 2005 ‘International Evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style’ Journal of Banking and Finance, 29: 1751-1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K.: 2005, Natural Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cortez, M. C. Silva, F and Areal, N. 2008. ‘The Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds’. Journal of Business Ethics, 87: 573-588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. Mattako, J. and Luther, R. 1997 ‘Ethical unit trust financial performance: Small company effects and fund size effects’. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(5): 705-725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havemann, R. and P. Webster: 1999, ‘Does Ethical Investment Pay?’, Ethical Investment Research Service, Report

  • Liu, Liqun, and Zijun Wang. 2008. ‘A Note on an Interpretation to Consumption-Based CAPM.’ Economics Letters, 99(3): 443-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther, R. G. Matatko, J. and Corner, D. C. 1992. ‘The investment performance of UK ‘Ethical’ unit trusts’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5 (4): 57-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C and Lewis, A: 1999. ‘Morals and Markets: the Case for Ethical Investing’, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3): 439-452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C.A. Saadouni, B. and Briston, R. J. 1995 ‘The financial performance of ethical investment funds’ Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(4): 483-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. J. 2008. ‘Keeping Ethical Investment Ethical: Regulatory Issues for Investing for Sustainability’. Journal of Business Ethics, 87: 555-572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, D.A. 1997 ‘The impact of social responsibility screens on investment performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2): 137-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2003). ‘The ‘Ethics’ of Ethical Investing’. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3); 195-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social investment forum: 2008, http://www.socialinvest.org/

  • Tietenberg, T. 1998. ‘Environmental Economics and Policy’ Addison Wesley, 2nd Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom Social Investment Forum: 2008, http://www.uksif.org/

  • Willis, A.: 2003, ‘The Role of the Global Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments’. Journal of Business Ethics, 43 (3); 233-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Jonathan Rhodes.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0431-3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhodes, M.J. Information Asymmetry and Socially Responsible Investment. J Bus Ethics 95, 145–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0343-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0343-2

Keywords

Navigation