Skip to main content
Log in

The Paradox of Machiavellianism: Machiavellianism May Make for Productive Sales but Poor Management Reviews

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates the effects of Machiavellianism (MACH) on sales performance. Results indicate that those who possess high Machiavellian traits are more productive but received lower overall managerial ratings. Findings suggest that Machiavellianism may in certain circumstances, be somewhat advantageous for long-term sales performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behrman, Douglas and William Perreault, Jr.: 1982, ‘Industrial Salespersons Performance’, Journal of Business Research 10, 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, Sandra L.: 1981, ‘Gender Scheme Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing’, Psychological Review 88 (July), 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, Louis and David Kurtz: 1988, ‘Selling and Sales Management in Action: Birth Order and the Sales Profession’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 8, 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskirk, Richard: 1974, Modern Management and Machiavelli (Cahners Books, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoon, Richard P.: 1969, ‘Niccolo Machiavelli and the Twentieth Century Administrator’, Academy of Management Journal 12 (June), 205–212.

  • Christie, R. and F. L. Geis: 1970, Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich, John Paul: 1993, ‘The Ethical Behavior of Retail Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 12 (March).

  • Fraedrich, Ferrell and Pride: 1989, ‘An Empirical Examination Of Three Machiavellian Concepts: Advertisers vs. The General Public’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 687–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futrell, Charles M.: 1984, ‘Salespeople's Perception of Sex Differences in Sales Managers’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management (May), 19–23.

  • Gable, Myron and Martin T. Topol: 1988, ‘Machiavellianism and the Department Store Executive’, Journal of Retailing 64 (Spring), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, Myron and Martin Topol: 1991, ‘Machiavellian Managers: Do They Perform Better’, Journal of Business Psychology 5 (Spring), 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, Myron, Charles Hollon and Frank Dangello, 1992, ‘Increasing the Utility of the Application Blank’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management XII, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Herbert and David Mayer: 1964, ‘A New Approach to the Scientific Selection of Successful Salesmen’, The Journal of Psychology 57(2), 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Jeanne and Herb Greenberg: 1990- 1991, ‘Regaining the Edge in Sales Productivity’, Employment Relations Today 17 (Winter), 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, Anthony: 1968, Management and Machiavelli (Holt Rhinehard and Winston, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman, Kevin: 1985, The Birth Order Book (Dell Publishing Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, William H.: 1982, ‘Supervisor and Employee Race and Sex Effects on Performance Appraisals: A Field Study of Adverse Impact and Generalizability’, Academy of Management Journal, 25, 598–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehling, Darrell and William Weeks: 1988, ‘Women's Perceptions of Personal Selling: Some Positive Results’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management VII (May), 11–20.

  • Nunnally J. C.: 1978, Psychometric Theory, 2nd Ed. (Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshavsky, Richard W.: 1973, ‘Customer-Salesman Interaction in Appliance Retailing’, Journal of Marketing Research 10 (May), 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, James and Cindy Randall: 1990, ‘Review of Salesperson Selection Technique and Criteria: A Managerial Approach’, International Journal of Research in Marketing 7, 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, John R.: 1994, ‘Machiavellianism and Personal Success in Marketing: The Moderating Role of Latitude for Improvisation’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22(4), 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. (1973), ‘The Relationship Between Sexrole Stereotypes and Requisite Management Characteristics’, Journal of Applied Psychology 57, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotland, Ezra, Stanley Sherman and Kelly Shaver: 1971, Empathy and Birth Order: Experimenta Explorations (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, Scott, James Lumpkin and Mohammed Rawwas: 1991, ‘Consumer Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(5).

  • Vlemming, R. G.: 1979, ‘Machiavellianism: A Preliminary View’, Psychological Reports 44 (February), 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhuizen, Brian Vander: 1993, ‘Antecedents, Outcomes, and Personal Factors Used by Sales Managers to Assess the Performance of Salespeople’, Academy of Marketing Science Proceedings XVI, 317 (Miami Beach, FL.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willet, Ron and Allan Pennington: 1966, ‘Customer and Salesman: The Anatomy of Choice and Influence in a Retail Setting’, Science, Technoloy Marketing, 598–616 (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricks, J., Fraedrich, J. The Paradox of Machiavellianism: Machiavellianism May Make for Productive Sales but Poor Management Reviews. Journal of Business Ethics 20, 197–205 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005956311600

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005956311600

Keywords

Navigation