Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Douglas Walton (2000), Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Brinton, Alan: 1992, ‘The Ad baculum re-clothed’ Informal Logic 14, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, D. J.: 2002, Persuasion: Theory and Research, 2nd edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, Robert C.: 2001, Argument, Inference and Dialectic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas: 1992, The Place of Emotion in Argument, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas: 1998, The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Windsor, Sunset 401, N9B 3P4, Windsor, Ontario, Canada

    Robert C. Pinto

Authors
  1. Robert C. Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinto, R.C. Douglas Walton (2000), Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats . Argumentation 18, 261–269 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ARGU.0000024105.02302.3a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ARGU.0000024105.02302.3a

Search

Navigation