Abstract
Faculty members at Canadian business schools were surveyed regarding their ethical perceptions of behaviours related to undergraduate instruction. Fifty-five behavioural statements were listed and respondents were asked to rate the extent to which they felt each behaviour was ethical or unethical. The only item that respondents endorsed as unequivocally unethical (90% indicated it was “definitely unethical”) was “Becoming sexually involved with an undergraduate in one of your classes.” We also compared the results of our sample to those of an American sample. Overall, an interesting pattern of differences emerged between the responses obtained in Canada and the U.S. In general, the direction of the significant differences was such that Canadian professors viewed the behaviours in question as less ethical than did their American counterparts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Academy of Management (2002). Academy of Management code of ethical conduct. Academy of Management Journal 45, 291–294.
Ahart, A.M. & Sackett, P.R. (2004). A new method for examining relationships between individual differences measures and sensitive behavior criteria: Evaluating the unmatched count technique. Organizational Research Methods 7, 101–114.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ashkanasy, N.M., Trevor-Roberts, E. & Earnshaw, L. (2002). The Anglo cluster: Legacy of the British empire. Journal of World Business 27, 28–39.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bem, D.J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 6, 1–62.
Birch, M., Elliott, D. & Trankel, M.A. (1999). Black and white and shades of gray: A portrait of the ethical professor. Ethics & Behaviour 9, 243–261.
Braxton, J. (Ed.) (1994). Special issue: Perspectives on research misconduct, Journal of Higher Education 65.
Byrne, J.A. (1992, April). Can ethics be taught? Harvard gives it the old college try. Business Week 6, 34.
Canadian Association of University Teachers (2004). CAUT Almanac of Post-Secondary Education in Canada (3rd ed.). Ottawa, ON: CAUT.
Chang, M.K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1825–1834.
Choong, P., Ho, S.K. & McDonald, R.A. (2002). An examination of the effects of social desirability bias on business ethics: Research results. International Journal of Management 19, 3–9.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (revised ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Daniel, L.G., Elliott-Howard, F. & DuFrene, D.D. (1997). The ethical issues rating scale: An instrument for measuring ethical orientation of college students toward various business practices. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57, 515–526.
David, F.R., Anderson, L.M. & Lawrimore, K.W. (1990). Perspectives on business ethics in management education. SAM Advanced Management Journal 9, 26–32.
Davis, J.R. & Welton, R.E. (1991). Professional ethics: Business students’ perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics 10, 451–463.
Dill, D. (Ed.) (1982). Special issue: Ethics and the academic profession. Journal of Higher Education 53.
Duizend, J. & McCann, G.K. (1998). Do collegiate business students show a propensity to engage in illegal business practices? Journal of Business Ethics 17, 229–238.
Engle, T.J. & Smith, J.L. (1990). The ethical standards of accounting academics. Issues in Accounting Education 5, 7–29.
Harris, J. (1989). Ethical values and decision processes of male and female business students. Journal of Education for Business 64, 234–238.
Holtschneider, D.H. (2001). Academic ethics: A state of the field. In J. Dienhart, D. Moberg & R. Duska (Eds.), The Next Phase of Business Ethics: Integrating Psychology and Ethics (pp. 483–493). Oxford, UK: JAI Press.
Lewellyn, P.A.G. (1996). Academic perceptions: Ethics in the information systems discipline. Journal of Business Ethics 15, 559–569.
Mason, J.B., Bearden, W.O. & Richardson, L.D. (1990). Perceived conduct and professional ethics among marketing faculty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18, 185–197.
Miesing, P. & Preble, J.F. (1985). A comparison of five business philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics 4, 465–476.
Robie, C. & Kidwell, R.E., Jr. (2003). The “ethical” professor and the undergraduate student: Current perceptions of moral behavior among business school faculty. Journal of Academic Ethics 1, 153–173.
Sauser, W.I., Jr. (1990). The ethics of teaching business: Toward a code for business professors. SAM Advanced Management Journal 9, 33–37.
Stevens, R.E., Harris, O.J. & Williamson, S. (1993). A comparison of ethical evaluations of business school faculty and students. Journal of Business Ethics 12, 611–619.
Stevens, R.E., Harris, O.J. & Williamson, S. (1994). Evaluations of ethical situations by university faculty: A comparative study. Journal of Education for Business 69, 145–150.
Tabachnick, B.G., Keith-Spiegel, P. & Pope, K.S. (1991). Ethics of teaching: Beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as educators. American Psychologist 46, 506–515.
Trevino, L.K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.
Viswesvaran, C., Deshpande, S.P. & Joseph, J. (2000). Are ethicality perceptions of different counterproductive behaviors affected by workplace dependencies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30, 2050–2057.
Wood, J.A., Longenecker, J.G., McKinney, J.A. & Moore, C.W. (1988). Ethical attitudes of students and business professionals: A study of moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 7, 249–257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robie, C., Keeping, L.M. Perceptions of Ethical Behaviour among Business Faculty in Canada. J Acad Ethics 2, 221–247 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-004-4306-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-004-4306-z